by Neo Danzig » Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:42 pm
by Cobranicium » Fri Dec 09, 2016 6:27 pm
by Neo Danzig » Fri Dec 09, 2016 6:40 pm
Cobranicium wrote:I like it but referring to that specific region is a bit of an issue - CAIN the region is not much of an issue. It would be better to perhaps condemn Brunhizzle, since he seems to be leading the whole shebang.
by Canton Empire » Fri Dec 09, 2016 6:57 pm
by Neo Danzig » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:02 pm
Canton Empire wrote:I think this is good, but it has no chance of passing. CAIN signatories make up 34% of the entire NS population. To put this into perspective, this is double the size of the entire country of San Marino. The delegates of these regions would torpedo this resolution before it even got off the ground.
by Canton Empire » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:05 pm
Neo Danzig wrote:Canton Empire wrote:I think this is good, but it has no chance of passing. CAIN signatories make up 34% of the entire NS population. To put this into perspective, this is double the size of the entire country of San Marino. The delegates of these regions would torpedo this resolution before it even got off the ground.
I don't expect it to be an easy path to victory, but it's worth a shot. Even if it is defeated, it'll at least spread awareness.
by Canton Empire » Fri Dec 09, 2016 8:56 pm
by Neo Danzig » Fri Dec 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Canton Empire wrote:Neo Danzig wrote:I don't expect it to be an easy path to victory, but it's worth a shot. Even if it is defeated, it'll at least spread awareness.
It's an impossible path to victory. I highly doubt this will make quorum. I suggest you generate awareness via R/D or a dispatch. Maybe even an interregional alliance.
by Neo Danzig » Fri Dec 09, 2016 9:16 pm
by Cobranicium » Fri Dec 09, 2016 9:38 pm
by Neo Danzig » Fri Dec 09, 2016 11:17 pm
by Crazy girl » Fri Dec 09, 2016 11:40 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Fri Dec 09, 2016 11:55 pm
Cobranicium wrote:I like it but referring to that specific region is a bit of an issue - CAIN the region is not much of an issue. It would be better to perhaps condemn Brunhizzle, since he seems to be leading the whole shebang.
by We Are Not the NSA » Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:50 am
Kaboomlandia wrote:Cobranicium wrote:I like it but referring to that specific region is a bit of an issue - CAIN the region is not much of an issue. It would be better to perhaps condemn Brunhizzle, since he seems to be leading the whole shebang.
Brun is female.
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Canton Empire » Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:56 am
Neo Danzig wrote:Cobranicium wrote:Probably this:
Meh, it could be argued that it's not a violation, as I never specifically mentioned him deleting post. It could be taken as any form of digital communication. Additionally, I think this part of Rule 4 allows it:
Any term included within NationStates the game - eg. passwords, World Factbook Entries, founders, eject, 'black helicopters transporting nations between regions' - legal
by DACOROMANIA » Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:50 am
by Crazy girl » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:09 pm
by Neo Danzig » Sat Dec 10, 2016 8:08 pm
Crazy girl wrote:It was that sentence indeed that made me delete your proposal, but not in the way you think.
Canton Empire wrote:Neo Danzig wrote:Meh, it could be argued that it's not a violation, as I never specifically mentioned him deleting post. It could be taken as any form of digital communication. Additionally, I think this part of Rule 4 allows it:
Any term included within NationStates the game - eg. passwords, World Factbook Entries, founders, eject, 'black helicopters transporting nations between regions' - legal
You can't use s/he to describe nations in the World Assembly.
by Neo Danzig » Sat Dec 10, 2016 8:17 pm
by Tim-Opolis » Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:07 pm
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Kalinin K-7 » Sun Dec 11, 2016 1:22 pm
Tim-Opolis wrote:Given the membership of CAIN, this will be stomped into the ground within minutes of going to vote. Have fun.
by Brunhizzle » Sun Dec 11, 2016 2:48 pm
Neo Danzig wrote:I considered doing that, but I'm not sure if he's actually the leader or just the one they decided to become the OP. Either way, I think that may be a better option. I'll ask about it before submitting the proposal to the Security Council, but I'll change it for now.
Since the interregional organization is mainly made up of Communists, raiders, and some defenders,
your group might be better off renaming itself CAIF (Coalition Against the Ideology of Fascism) or CAGN (Coalition Against German Nationalism) than CAIN.
by Neo Danzig » Mon Dec 12, 2016 12:31 pm
Tim-Opolis wrote:Given the membership of CAIN, this will be stomped into the ground within minutes of going to vote. Have fun.
by United States of Vietnam » Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:21 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement