Giuliani said "Under those 8 years before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attacks in the United States. They all started when Clinton and Obama got into office."
Advertisement

by Eol Sha » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:17 pm

by Galloism » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:29 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Vassenor wrote:
But he said 9/11 never happened so it must be true.Frank Bruni in the NY Times wrote:... Trump has been [Giuliani's] ticket to a renewed and terrifying omnipresence. His expression — part sneer, part glare, all menace — turns small forest creatures to stone. At the sound of his voice, roses drop their petals.
He was railing last week about Bill Clinton’s sexual history, a kooky case for him, in particular, to prosecute. Back when he was the mayor of New York, he was no choirboy, and his wife then — No. 2 of three — learned in a famously cruel fashion that he’d be leaving her. He announced it at a news conference.

by Farnhamia » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:39 pm

by AiliailiA » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:54 pm
Eol Sha wrote:Ebliania wrote:wtf you serious
Giuliani said "Under those 8 years before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attacks in the United States. They all started when Clinton and Obama got into office."
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by Eol Sha » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:58 pm
Ailiailia wrote:Eol Sha wrote:Giuliani said "Under those 8 years before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attacks in the United States. They all started when Clinton and Obama got into office."
Context though. He'd been talking (at length, as usual) about the 9/11 attacks, then about Mike Pence who "helped fashion" the Patriot Act ... and then the sentence you quoted.
Out of context it is wrong: 8 years "before Obama" clearly involves Sept 2001, but in context it was just a gaffe. He meant that the Patriot Act stopped any terrorist attacks in the remainder of Bush's term.
Here's the thing though. Even that is wrong.


by Farnhamia » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:00 pm
Ailiailia wrote:Eol Sha wrote:Giuliani said "Under those 8 years before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attacks in the United States. They all started when Clinton and Obama got into office."
Context though. He'd been talking (at length, as usual) about the 9/11 attacks, then about Mike Pence who "helped fashion" the Patriot Act ... and then the sentence you quoted.
Out of context it is wrong: 8 years "before Obama" clearly involves Sept 2001, but in context it was just a gaffe. He meant that the Patriot Act stopped any terrorist attacks in the remainder of Bush's term.
Here's the thing though. Even that is wrong.

by The Black Forrest » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:46 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Ailiailia wrote:
Context though. He'd been talking (at length, as usual) about the 9/11 attacks, then about Mike Pence who "helped fashion" the Patriot Act ... and then the sentence you quoted.
Out of context it is wrong: 8 years "before Obama" clearly involves Sept 2001, but in context it was just a gaffe. He meant that the Patriot Act stopped any terrorist attacks in the remainder of Bush's term.
Here's the thing though. Even that is wrong.
Domestic terrorism doesn't count. Everyone knows that. I heard some third-graders talking about it just the ither day.

by Jerzylvania » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:38 pm

by Outer Sparta » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:55 pm
Eol Sha wrote:Ebliania wrote:wtf you serious
Giuliani said "Under those 8 years before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attacks in the United States. They all started when Clinton and Obama got into office."

by MERIZoC » Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:20 pm
In July of this year, the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the Chamber of Commerce, two organizations with long, proud histories of challenging organized labor, expressed genuine excitement at Hillary Clinton’s decision to tap Tim Kaine, the US senator and former governor of Virginia, as her running mate.
In a press release published immediately after the selection, Jay Timmons, the CEO and president of NAM, stated, “I have worked with Sen. Kaine in a number of capacities over the years and am pleased to count him as a friend. From his time as mayor of Richmond, to lieutenant governor and governor of Virginia, to his current service in the U.S. Senate, Sen. Kaine has proven to be a principled leader.” While acknowledging that he doesn’t agree with Kaine “on every issue,” the NAM head nevertheless lauded what he called Kaine’s “integrity.”
For its part, the Chamber of Commerce commended Kaine for understanding “how important global markets are for creating opportunities for U.S. companies and workers.” Both organizations applauded Kaine for his previous statements in support of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which critics have called “NAFTA on steroids.”
It also couldn’t hurt that Kaine hails from a “right to work” state, one of twenty-six where unions are prevented from collecting “fair share” fees for representing non-union employees and where workers generally enjoy a lower standard of living.
Business organizations have long pushed right-to-work laws, and the spokespersons for these organizations, including the National Right To Work Committee — an Astroturf group headquartered in Kaine’s home state of Virginia — present themselves as defenders of “worker rights” and opponents of “union bosses.” NRTWC describes itself as an honorable fighter for the rights of the underdogs, independently minded job-hunters, and workers forced to confront intrusive and often violent “labor union monopolies.”
And it has nothing to worry about locally: Kaine has a well-documented history of supporting his state’s union-crushing law.

by New West Guiana » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:15 pm

by Corrian » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:23 pm
New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.

by Camicon » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:24 pm
New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the artsThe Trews, Under The Sun
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter

by New West Guiana » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:25 pm
Corrian wrote:Of course doing illegal things is only bad when it involves him, not when he tells them to hack Hillary.

by The Romulan Republic » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:32 pm
Corrian wrote:New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.
Of course doing illegal things is only bad when it involves him, not when he tells them to hack Hillary.

by Liriena » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:45 pm
New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Guy » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:56 pm
Merizoc wrote:Good read
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/09/clinton-kaine-progressive-era-roosevelt-open-shop/In July of this year, the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the Chamber of Commerce, two organizations with long, proud histories of challenging organized labor, expressed genuine excitement at Hillary Clinton’s decision to tap Tim Kaine, the US senator and former governor of Virginia, as her running mate.
In a press release published immediately after the selection, Jay Timmons, the CEO and president of NAM, stated, “I have worked with Sen. Kaine in a number of capacities over the years and am pleased to count him as a friend. From his time as mayor of Richmond, to lieutenant governor and governor of Virginia, to his current service in the U.S. Senate, Sen. Kaine has proven to be a principled leader.” While acknowledging that he doesn’t agree with Kaine “on every issue,” the NAM head nevertheless lauded what he called Kaine’s “integrity.”
For its part, the Chamber of Commerce commended Kaine for understanding “how important global markets are for creating opportunities for U.S. companies and workers.” Both organizations applauded Kaine for his previous statements in support of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which critics have called “NAFTA on steroids.”
It also couldn’t hurt that Kaine hails from a “right to work” state, one of twenty-six where unions are prevented from collecting “fair share” fees for representing non-union employees and where workers generally enjoy a lower standard of living.
Business organizations have long pushed right-to-work laws, and the spokespersons for these organizations, including the National Right To Work Committee — an Astroturf group headquartered in Kaine’s home state of Virginia — present themselves as defenders of “worker rights” and opponents of “union bosses.” NRTWC describes itself as an honorable fighter for the rights of the underdogs, independently minded job-hunters, and workers forced to confront intrusive and often violent “labor union monopolies.”
And it has nothing to worry about locally: Kaine has a well-documented history of supporting his state’s union-crushing law.
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.

by Thermodolia » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:59 pm
New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.

by Guy » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:01 pm
Thermodolia wrote:New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.
Unfortunately it's not going to matter as there are those who think that Trump not paying any taxes is a good thing
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.

by Hittanryan » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:04 pm
New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.

by The Romulan Republic » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:10 pm
Thermodolia wrote:New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.
Unfortunately it's not going to matter as there are those who think that Trump not paying any taxes is a good thing

by Thermodolia » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:15 pm

by Zurkerx » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:29 pm
New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.

by Farnhamia » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:31 pm
Zurkerx wrote:New West Guiana wrote:New York Times obtain copies of Trumps 1995 Tax Returns from source in Trump Tower
In response Trump is threatening to sue the NYT for publishing this story from tax returns "obtained illegally".
In 1995 Trump reported $916 million in loses, which could have allowed him from avoid paying taxes in 18 years.
That is a big number for net operating losses. Considering he can carry that back three years and the rest forward, it would explain why he didn't pay his contractors/employees and why he made the reference "That makes me smart" when accused of not paying taxes.
The $916 million loss certainly could have eliminated any federal income taxes Mr. Trump otherwise would have owed on the $50,000 to $100,000 he was paid for each episode of “The Apprentice,” or the roughly $45 million he was paid between 1995 and 2009 when he was chairman or chief executive of the publicly traded company he created to assume ownership of his troubled Atlantic City casinos. Ordinary investors in the new company, meanwhile, saw the value of their shares plunge to 17 cents from $35.50, while scores of contractors went unpaid for work on Mr. Trump’s casinos and casino bondholders received pennies on the dollar.

by Zurkerx » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:36 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
That is a big number for net operating losses. Considering he can carry that back three years and the rest forward, it would explain why he didn't pay his contractors/employees and why he made the reference "That makes me smart" when accused of not paying taxes.
Smart, right. It worked out great for him.The $916 million loss certainly could have eliminated any federal income taxes Mr. Trump otherwise would have owed on the $50,000 to $100,000 he was paid for each episode of “The Apprentice,” or the roughly $45 million he was paid between 1995 and 2009 when he was chairman or chief executive of the publicly traded company he created to assume ownership of his troubled Atlantic City casinos. Ordinary investors in the new company, meanwhile, saw the value of their shares plunge to 17 cents from $35.50, while scores of contractors went unpaid for work on Mr. Trump’s casinos and casino bondholders received pennies on the dollar.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anakona, Armeriea, Bombadil, Dushina, Elejamie, Ifreann, Kurgao, Kuromistan, Marenmia-Ocasia, Nilokeras, Omerta, PUHAETELA, Reactionary Europe, The Black Forrest, Waaaaaah
Advertisement