Millenials and entitlement, laziness etc.

[Jumalariik]

?

If you go back to the initial post, you'll understand:

Zizek would have a field day with this!

If SJWs aren't "robots", or some monolithic borg-like enemy of "Western culture" or whatever anti-feminists and alt-rightists claim to defend, then they are pure ideology: it has a far too fluid meaning to serve as anything but an extension of ideology, a scapegoat.

If SJW doesn't have a rigid definition (if they aren't "robots"), then the are effectively a void of "everything bad". It means whatever you want it to mean; it's pure ideology.

SJW are people who fit into this category ideologically:
-Support Social Justice Causes
-Believe that gender is not a binary
-Believe that race doesn't exist, yet that whites have privilege
-Supporting 3rd wave feminism
-Supporting BLM style movements

[Grenartia]

What does this have to do with my initial point: "SJW" is...

?

If you don't know what an SJW is, then why are you railing against them?

[Jumalariik]

?

If you don't know what an SJW is, then why are you railing against them?

I just gave a vague definition on the post above....

[Neutraligon]

If you go back to the initial post, you'll understand:



If SJW doesn't have a rigid definition (if they aren't "robots"), then the are effectively a void of "everything bad". It means whatever you want it to mean; it's pure ideology.

SJW are people who fit into this category ideologically:
-Support Social Justice Causes Check
-Believe that gender is not a binary Check
-Believe that race doesn't exist, yet that whites have privilege (I believe the idea is race is not based on anything scientific, but that it exists socially)Check
-Supporting 3rd wave feminism
-Supporting BLM style movementsCheck

I fit most of those, does one have to fit all to be SJW? Funny enough...I disagree with many of the opinions of those who are labelled as SJWs (Anita Sarkeesian is a particular pet peeve of mine).

[The New Sea Territory]

Zizek would have a field day with this!

If SJWs aren't "robots", or some monolithic borg-like enemy of "Western culture" or whatever anti-feminists and alt-rightists claim to defend, then they are pure ideology: it has a far too fluid meaning to serve as anything but an extension of ideology, a scapegoat.

Zizek doesn't make a lick or sense or even consistent.

You've slipped on Freud's banana peel.

SJW's are, you know, people. Not pure ideology(whatever that means) or robots.

This completely ignores how "SJW" functions in the ideology of anti-feminists: the way "Jews" functioned to the Nazis. Sure, Jews are people, but the way the function in Nazi rhetoric is itself dehumanizing...making them purely ideological.

[The New Sea Territory]

SJW are people who fit into this category ideologically:
-Support Social Justice Causes
-Believe that gender is not a binary
-Believe that race doesn't exist, yet that whites have privilege
-Supporting 3rd wave feminism
-Supporting BLM style movements

Far to vague to be anything more meaningful than your own ideological projections on reality.

[The balkens]

Which can change from one thing to another based on what seems popular at the time.

You've basically turned into the very SJW you so despise, Balk.

I can fix that.

With Bleach, electrodes and very unclenched sphincter.

[Jumalariik]

SJW are people who fit into this category ideologically:
-Support Social Justice Causes
-Believe that gender is not a binary
-Believe that race doesn't exist, yet that whites have privilege
-Supporting 3rd wave feminism
-Supporting BLM style movements

I fit most of those, does one have to fit all to be SJW? Funny enough...I disagree with many of the opinions of those who are labelled as SJWs (Anita Sarkeesian is a particular pet peeve of mine).

You have to fill at least a few of those. Further, I should have mentioned a type of soft 3rd worldism

[Jumalariik]

SJW are people who fit into this category ideologically:
-Support Social Justice Causes
-Believe that gender is not a binary
-Believe that race doesn't exist, yet that whites have privilege
-Supporting 3rd wave feminism
-Supporting BLM style movements

Far to vague to be anything more meaningful than your own ideological projections on reality.

No.

[Germanic Templars]

You've basically turned into the very SJW you so despise, Balk.

I can fix that.

With Bleach, electrodes and very unclenched sphincter.

I laughed harder at this than needed.

[Grenartia]

If you don't know what an SJW is, then why are you railing against them?

I just gave a vague definition on the post above....

Now we have something to work with.

If you go back to the initial post, you'll understand:



If SJW doesn't have a rigid definition (if they aren't "robots"), then the are effectively a void of "everything bad". It means whatever you want it to mean; it's pure ideology.

SJW are people who fit into this category ideologically:
1-Support Social Justice Causes
2-Believe that gender is not a binary
-Believe that race doesn't exist, yet that whites have privilege
3-Supporting 3rd wave feminism
-Supporting BLM style movements

What, I ask, is wrong with the numbered criteria?

As for the underlined, I've never seen anybody simultaneously say those things. Its either one or the other (excluding those who declare that racism from whites is dead or similar).

I'm sure you can find plenty of people who otherwise fit this description that do not support BLM.

[Neutraligon]

I fit most of those, does one have to fit all to be SJW? Funny enough...I disagree with many of the opinions of those who are labelled as SJWs (Anita Sarkeesian is a particular pet peeve of mine).

You have to fill at least a few of those. Further, I should have mentioned a type of soft 3rd worldism

Look at my edit, depending on what is meant by third wave feminism, and given my caveat I fit most of those. What do you mean by 3rd worldism?

[Valystria]

Your actions give the impression you're vehemently unwilling to address or look upon opposing sources of information is because it's easier to rely on snark, insults, and mockery. You're welcome to discuss the content of the post you were mocking, and the article in it.

It's irrelevant that Breitbart was cited. The content of the article is directly quoted from various other sources. Sources the NSG left-wing find quite acceptable. As such, there's no grounds for you to reject a source for no other reason than it not being ideologically acceptable to you. Honest discussion involves addressing what the other side has to say instead of relying on mockery, insults, and no platforming.

From the article;

Gawker.

Slate.

From the article;

The article is a fine example of a Millennial academic culture having taken over various institutions, and of the disconnect between these university educated millennials and the rest of the populace.

The same pattern is found elsewhere too. It's from a cultural and social phenomenon undeniably linked to a certain type of millennial.

"I'm being ideological because I'm not interested in reading articles where other people are being ideological."

It's almost as nonsensical as "tolerance is intolerance because it doesn't tolerate intolerance".

I'll continue waiting for you to address the content of the post you were responding to, and the article in it. Discussing comparisons doesn't accomplish anything other than to avoid discussion of what you were mocking.

---

"I'm being ideological because I'm not interested in reading articles where other people are being ideological."

It's almost as nonsensical as "tolerance is intolerance because it doesn't tolerate intolerance".

Being biased against bias is being bias!

Snark and mockery. No actual discussion. The article was quite clear on the provided examples of a Millennial bias, and how significantly that Millennial bias differs from the rest of the populace. You're welcome to discuss that without resorting to generic snark and mockery.

---

The article is a fine example of a Millennial academic culture having taken over various institutions, and of the disconnect between these university educated millennials and the rest of the populace.

The same pattern is found elsewhere too. It's from a cultural and social phenomenon undeniably linked to a certain type of millennial.

It isn't a disconnect between university educated millennials and the rest of the populace; its the vanguard of a movement that has gradually been attacking Western culture for decades. They haven't won this particular battle yet but they have won plenty in the last sixty years and unless people recognize it for what it is and fight back then they will win this fight too.

I don't disagree. I've merely expressed an evidence-based indication of how there is a measurable severe disconnect between university educated millennials and the rest of the populace. Those university educated millennials happen to be the vanguard of that anti-Western movement you've mentioned. A start for getting people to recognize it for what it is would be for the media and many other institutions, universities in particular, to cease catering to the demands of that anti-Western movement dominated by the university educated millennials.

[Grenartia]

SJW are people who fit into this category ideologically:
-Support Social Justice Causes Check
-Believe that gender is not a binary Check
-Believe that race doesn't exist, yet that whites have privilege (I believe the idea is race is not based on anything scientific, but that it exists socially)Check
-Supporting 3rd wave feminism
-Supporting BLM style movementsCheck

I fit most of those, does one have to fit all to be SJW? Funny enough...I disagree with many of the opinions of those who are labelled as SJWs (Anita Sarkeesian is a particular pet peeve of mine).

Same here. I would assert that few, if any, on the left here are more anti-SJW (at least the stereotype thereof) than I.

[Grenartia]

I fit most of those, does one have to fit all to be SJW? Funny enough...I disagree with many of the opinions of those who are labelled as SJWs (Anita Sarkeesian is a particular pet peeve of mine).

You have to fill at least a few of those. Further, I should have mentioned a type of soft 3rd worldism

Dafuq? What does that even mean?

[Jumalariik]

I just gave a vague definition on the post above....

Now we have something to work with.

SJW are people who fit into this category ideologically:
1-Support Social Justice Causes
2-Believe that gender is not a binary
-Believe that race doesn't exist, yet that whites have privilege
3-Supporting 3rd wave feminism
-Supporting BLM style movements

What, I ask, is wrong with the numbered criteria?

As for the underlined, I've never seen anybody simultaneously say those things. Its either one or the other (excluding those who declare that racism from whites is dead or similar).

I'm sure you can find plenty of people who otherwise fit this description that do not support BLM.

I could agree with those three as one deffiniton.

I don't agree with any of the three though.

[Grenartia]

Now we have something to work with.



What, I ask, is wrong with the numbered criteria?

As for the underlined, I've never seen anybody simultaneously say those things. Its either one or the other (excluding those who declare that racism from whites is dead or similar).

I'm sure you can find plenty of people who otherwise fit this description that do not support BLM.

I could agree with those three as one deffiniton.

I don't agree with any of the three though.

That doesn't actually answer my question.

[Lady Scylla]

Being biased against bias is being bias!

Snark and mockery. No actual discussion. The article was quite clear on the provided examples of a Millennial bias, and how significantly that Millennial bias differs from the rest of the populace. You're welcome to discuss that without resorting to generic snark and mockery.

---

I'm snarky when I know someone doesn't have anything meaningful to say and is just a waste of my time. Pokes self Oh look, I'm not made of straw either, now what? Doesn't look like you can use your typical strawman defense here.

[Panslavicland]

It isn't a disconnect between university educated millennials and the rest of the populace; its the vanguard of a movement that has gradually been attacking Western culture for decades. They haven't won this particular battle yet but they have won plenty in the last sixty years and unless people recognize it for what it is and fight back then they will win this fight too.

I don't disagree. I've merely expressed an evidence-based indication of how there is a measurable severe disconnect between university educated millennials and the rest of the populace. Those university educated millennials happen to be the vanguard of that anti-Western movement you've mentioned. A start for getting people to recognize it for what it is would be for the media and many other institutions, universities in particular, to cease catering to the demands of that anti-Western movement dominated by the university educated millennials.

The media and universities are not going to cease catering to their demands of their own volition when they've been among the strongest backers of these people for decades. It will only stop when they are made to stop the cultural Marxists.

[Jumalariik]

You have to fill at least a few of those. Further, I should have mentioned a type of soft 3rd worldism

Dafuq? What does that even mean?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-Worldism

[Neutraligon]

I fit most of those, does one have to fit all to be SJW? Funny enough...I disagree with many of the opinions of those who are labelled as SJWs (Anita Sarkeesian is a particular pet peeve of mine).

Same here. I would assert that few, if any, on the left here are more anti-SJW (at least the stereotype thereof) than I.

One of the things that I have seen in common with most SJWs (or at least those who are called SJWs) is the SJWs attempt to stimie free speech though attacking people's jobs, trying to get people banned from social media, sometimes legally (Anita and her proposal before the UN about stuff on the internet), etc. I support many of the things listed, I despise the attempts to curtail free speech. It's funny, the one thing that I see as the most common in those labelled as SJWs is the one thing not listed, and there are a buch of things that are included that I have seen many who are labeled as SJWs do not support.

[Lady Scylla]

Dafuq? What does that even mean?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-Worldism

Given, I don't like SJWs, but I've never heard, nor seen a single one advocate for that.

[Neutraligon]

I don't disagree. I've merely expressed an evidence-based indication of how there is a measurable severe disconnect between university educated millennials and the rest of the populace. Those university educated millennials happen to be the vanguard of that anti-Western movement you've mentioned. A start for getting people to recognize it for what it is would be for the media and many other institutions, universities in particular, to cease catering to the demands of that anti-Western movement dominated by the university educated millennials.

The media and universities are not going to cease catering to their demands of their own volition when they've been among the strongest backers of these people for decades. It will only stop when they are made to stop the cultural Marxists.

Who are cultural Marxists and what is Cultural Marxism?

[Grenartia]

I don't disagree. I've merely expressed an evidence-based indication of how there is a measurable severe disconnect between university educated millennials and the rest of the populace. Those university educated millennials happen to be the vanguard of that anti-Western movement you've mentioned. A start for getting people to recognize it for what it is would be for the media and many other institutions, universities in particular, to cease catering to the demands of that anti-Western movement dominated by the university educated millennials.

The media and universities are not going to cease catering to their demands of their own volition when they've been among the strongest backers of these people for decades. It will only stop when they are made to stop the cultural Marxists.

Define "Cultural Marxism".

[The balkens]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-Worldism

Given, I don't like SJWs, but I've never heard, nor seen a single one advocate for that.

its a new wave of Communism, one would think.