Llamalandia wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Mutations are natural unless you mean genetic engineering.
True but not all mutations are "desirable." Certainly a mutation leading to homosexuality is unlikely to be reproductively advantageous. Of course ultimately we don't determine morality based on natural selection.
It depends on what you mean "reproductively advantageous".
Not all mutations are, or should be, for the sole purpose of having more offspring. Many times, said mutations shape the reproductive pool of a population.