You can have the image link to the full size.Bawdon wrote:Had to resize the image
- Code: Select all
[url=https://s31.postimg.org/ittzbb3ex/MODEL_1962_DONE.png][img]https://s32.postimg.org/sfgpcr2hx/MODEL_1962_DONE_resized.png[/img][/url]
Advertisement
by Korva » Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:41 am
You can have the image link to the full size.Bawdon wrote:Had to resize the image
[url=https://s31.postimg.org/ittzbb3ex/MODEL_1962_DONE.png][img]https://s32.postimg.org/sfgpcr2hx/MODEL_1962_DONE_resized.png[/img][/url]
by Purpelia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 9:23 am
by Purpelia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 9:34 am
by Autonomous Unified Territories » Sat Jul 09, 2016 9:53 am
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:Autonomous Unified Territories wrote:And this is a concept for an infantry support vehicle, basically a T-55 but again upgraded and only designed to support urban operations and other conflicts where it won't face any other Main Battle Tanks.
No offence but why do people keep thinking this is a remotely realistic expectation?
by Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 9:57 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Purpelia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 9:58 am
by Autonomous Unified Territories » Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:03 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:If you don't expect to face tanks, why are you keeping around sub-standard tanks that will not be used against other tanks?
Why not deploy your normal tanks?
by Purpelia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:04 am
by Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:07 am
Autonomous Unified Territories wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:If you don't expect to face tanks, why are you keeping around sub-standard tanks that will not be used against other tanks?
Why not deploy your normal tanks?
The idea was that financially it was cheaper to maintain a series of older vehicles to fulfill most of the mission requirements, then to shell out a lot more money to procure man more M79A1s, which are far more expensive and completely re-fitted.
Although as we have this discussion I question whether this platform is even suitable. Perhaps I may look into some other tracked vehicle that did not originate as a tank.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Autonomous Unified Territories » Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:16 am
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:30 am
Autonomous Unified Territories wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:No offence but why do people keep thinking this is a remotely realistic expectation?
Plenty of modern battles have utilized tanks as fire support against enemies which do not possess any. Counter-insurgencies of the mid 2000s are a good example of this. So, I think there is still a place for this concept.
by Gallia- » Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:00 pm
Autonomous Unified Territories wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:If you don't expect to face tanks, why are you keeping around sub-standard tanks that will not be used against other tanks?
Why not deploy your normal tanks?
The idea was that financially it was cheaper to maintain a series of older vehicles to fulfill most of the mission requirements, then to shell out a lot more money to procure man more M79A1s, which are far more expensive and completely re-fitted.
Although as we have this discussion I question whether this platform is even suitable. Perhaps I may look into some other tracked vehicle that did not originate as a tank.
by The Akasha Colony » Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:07 pm
Autonomous Unified Territories wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:If you don't expect to face tanks, why are you keeping around sub-standard tanks that will not be used against other tanks?
Why not deploy your normal tanks?
The idea was that financially it was cheaper to maintain a series of older vehicles to fulfill most of the mission requirements, then to shell out a lot more money to procure man more M79A1s, which are far more expensive and completely re-fitted.
Although as we have this discussion I question whether this platform is even suitable. Perhaps I may look into some other tracked vehicle that did not originate as a tank.
by Autonomous Unified Territories » Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:21 pm
The Akasha Colony wrote:Autonomous Unified Territories wrote:
The idea was that financially it was cheaper to maintain a series of older vehicles to fulfill most of the mission requirements, then to shell out a lot more money to procure man more M79A1s, which are far more expensive and completely re-fitted.
Although as we have this discussion I question whether this platform is even suitable. Perhaps I may look into some other tracked vehicle that did not originate as a tank.
If your infantry are riding around in modern fighting vehicles I would wonder whether the T-55 could even keep up with them without a serious overhaul to the drivetrain and running gear. And that won't be inexpensive.
by Zrhajan » Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:13 pm
by The Akasha Colony » Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:19 pm
Zrhajan wrote:WRT tank design, is it still valid to create a vehicle with very little armor but extreme speed and maneuverability in this day and age, following the legacy of Hellcats and Christie?
by Ardavia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:26 pm
Zrhajan wrote:WRT tank design, is it still valid to create a vehicle with very little armor but extreme speed and maneuverability in this day and age, following the legacy of Hellcats and Christie?
by Omarios » Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:32 pm
Purpelia wrote:Omarios wrote:If this is directed to me, then what do you mean exactly?
I mean that when you start measuring from the front of the hull, where the slope ends to the front of the turret there is enough room there to hold a picnic.
Compare to this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... ematic.png
Danceria wrote:Erm...*Inches away from them*
by Purpelia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:14 pm
Omarios wrote:Purpelia wrote:I mean that when you start measuring from the front of the hull, where the slope ends to the front of the turret there is enough room there to hold a picnic.
Compare to this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... ematic.png
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
by Purpelia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:41 pm
by United States of PA » Sat Jul 09, 2016 5:31 pm
by Purpelia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 5:49 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Indo States, Kamijiro, Nebriana, Oronia
Advertisement