Advertisement
by The East Marches » Tue May 31, 2016 1:10 pm
by Nayba Collective » Tue May 31, 2016 1:29 pm
Annorax wrote:These are conservative positions. Why wouldn't conservatives endorse Trump our call out Chairman Obama on his birth in Honolulu? I think what you are really asking is if there is an American conservative news outlet that book licks progressive Democrats in which case you will find none.
...
by Dinake » Tue May 31, 2016 1:50 pm
Staythefout wrote:Breitbart, Townhall, the Federalist, and National Review are pretty good...they've made a handful of errors I can think of "off hand" but nothing major.
by Dinake » Tue May 31, 2016 1:54 pm
Nayba Collective wrote:Major-Tom wrote:
It's just a really smug and pretentious saying.
"Reality has a left wing bias" is a simple way of saying "I'm right, because I stand with reality, and you're just delusional."
I am probably best summarized as a Centre-Left Nationalist, and I have to say that I agree. "Reality has a left-wing bias" is nothing but low-class bumper-sticker politicking. The phrase exists primarily for self-gratification, and should only be used for countering equally self-gratifying phrases like the one about "heart by 20, brain by 30".Annorax wrote:These are conservative positions. Why wouldn't conservatives endorse Trump our call out Chairman Obama on his birth in Honolulu? I think what you are really asking is if there is an American conservative news outlet that book licks progressive Democrats in which case you will find none.
...
The Right has been burning through ridiculous amounts of social capital and making themselves look like racist idiots since the beginning with the whole Birtherism thing. It's not only likely untrue, but makes it that much easier for the Left to portray the Right as a bunch of delusional, racist conspiracy theorists.
by Hirota » Wed Jun 01, 2016 3:02 am
by Dejanic » Wed Jun 01, 2016 3:25 am
by SaintB » Wed Jun 01, 2016 3:41 am
by Dejanic » Wed Jun 01, 2016 4:05 am
SaintB wrote:If you want a trustworthy news source then don't look for one that has a political bias.
by Alvecia » Wed Jun 01, 2016 4:52 am
by Freefall11111 » Wed Jun 01, 2016 5:44 am
by SaintB » Wed Jun 01, 2016 5:45 am
by Alvecia » Wed Jun 01, 2016 5:49 am
by MERIZoC » Wed Jun 01, 2016 5:52 am
by Esternial » Wed Jun 01, 2016 7:15 am
by UniversalCommons » Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:23 pm
by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:09 pm
by The East Marches » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:10 pm
UniversalCommons wrote:The Financial Times is currently considered the most reliable of the business newspapers. Even more so than the Wall Street Journal. It is fairly conservative in outlook. There is a US edition which is different than the British edition.
by The East Marches » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:11 pm
Dejanic wrote:Their isn't many, but there's hardly many trustworthy "liberal" news sources either. News sources are generally just shitty in the USA.
by Luminesa » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:14 pm
Geilinor wrote:Dinake wrote:Fox gets a bad rap, but it's not nearly as bad as people say. Of course, it's not exactly a pillar of journalistic integrity either, but if that's what you're looking for you shouldn't rely on cable news anyway. I suppose CNN comes closest, but even that isn't the greatest.
Better sources in the US are more print-type sources. Time, NYT, Forbes, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Christian Science Monitor, etc. are all pretty good sources.
I forgot Forbes. They can be good but most of it is opinion. The business-oriented sources are generally the most reputable conservative ones.
by Republic of the Cristo » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:14 pm
by Turkic Confederation » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:55 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Abrahamia-, Aggicificicerous, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bovad, Daphomir, Dresderstan, Europa Undivided, Grinning Dragon, Hidrandia, High Earth, HISPIDA, New Ziedrich, New-Minneapolis, Ors Might, Philjia, Port Carverton, San Lumen, Sarduri, Shrillland, Southland, Tiami, Uiiop, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement