Advertisement
by Novus America » Tue May 17, 2016 7:42 pm
by Dooom35796821595 » Tue May 17, 2016 7:44 pm
by SD_Film Artists » Wed May 18, 2016 4:38 am
Europe and Oceania wrote:I wouldn't mind the U.S. being Great Britain's colonies again, I don't like monarchies though so that has got to go.
Other than that I'm an anglophile.
by The Archregimancy » Wed May 18, 2016 5:11 am
SD_Film Artists wrote:Europe and Oceania wrote:I wouldn't mind the U.S. being Great Britain's colonies again, I don't like monarchies though so that has got to go.
Other than that I'm an anglophile.
Yes, it's good that America is leading the world against hereditry rule- with the wife of a former president contesting against someone who won against a president's brother who's dad was also president.
by Roma Byzantina » Wed May 18, 2016 6:54 am
The Archregimancy wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:
Yes, it's good that America is leading the world against hereditry rule- with the wife of a former president contesting against someone who won against a president's brother who's dad was also president.
Ah, to be Canadian - where you can have both a hereditary head of state and a hereditary head of government....
by Old Tyrannia » Wed May 18, 2016 7:31 am
The Archregimancy wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:
Yes, it's good that America is leading the world against hereditry rule- with the wife of a former president contesting against someone who won against a president's brother who's dad was also president.
Ah, to be Canadian - where you can have both a hereditary head of state and a hereditary head of government....
by The Empire of Pretantia » Wed May 18, 2016 7:35 am
by Hakons » Wed May 18, 2016 1:28 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Hakons wrote:
So if a monarch is a "symbol," they have no practical purpose. A nation should unify on their basic principals like liberty and democracy, and not on one person that will die eventually. It is much easier to place loyalty in time honored principals than in a different person every generation or two.Because freedom.... freedom never dies
A monarchy is the Head of State, negating the need for one to be elected. And they can also be important symbols of a nations culture and history.
War...War never changes.until they started using immortals
?The Nihilistic view wrote:Hakons wrote:
So if a monarch is a "symbol," they have no practical purpose. A nation should unify on their basic principals like liberty and democracy, and not on one person that will die eventually. It is much easier to place loyalty in time honored principals than in a different person every generation or two.Because freedom.... freedom never dies
So handing out the complete works of John Locke would have created a stronger unity and national strength in 1940-41 than the King and Churchill among others bringing the nation together with the resolve to carry on?
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Novus America wrote:
So we can just make the Statue of Liberty our queen. She does as much as yours. Who is also nothing more than a symbol and tourist attraction.
Our Queen does more work then your presidents.
I'd really like to see that. Of course, it would require turning the Statue of Liberty into a 50' mecha and have it walk around as the American head of state.
by Europe and Oceania » Wed May 18, 2016 1:33 pm
SD_Film Artists wrote:Europe and Oceania wrote:I wouldn't mind the U.S. being Great Britain's colonies again, I don't like monarchies though so that has got to go.
Other than that I'm an anglophile.
Yes, it's good that America is leading the world against hereditry rule- with the wife of a former president contesting against someone who won against a president's brother who's dad was also president.
by Roma Byzantina » Wed May 18, 2016 1:39 pm
Hakons wrote:To everyone now:
I have yet to see someone explain to me why a hereditary ruler is preferable to a democratic ruler. Why does a monarch deserve their position? How on Earth are you going to get good leaders based on rigid hereditary rules that pay no attention to ability?
by Hakons » Wed May 18, 2016 4:36 pm
Roma Byzantina wrote:Hakons wrote:To everyone now:
I have yet to see someone explain to me why a hereditary ruler is preferable to a democratic ruler. Why does a monarch deserve their position? How on Earth are you going to get good leaders based on rigid hereditary rules that pay no attention to ability?
The Monarch would be a symbol, while Congress (from my understanding) would choose a Prime Minister. Combine that with the right voting system (not FPTP) and it might be possible to drag the US out of the "Possibly a flawed Democracy" zone.
by Neolvex » Wed May 18, 2016 4:37 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:
Yes, it's good that America is leading the world against hereditry rule- with the wife of a former president contesting against someone who won against a president's brother who's dad was also president.
Ah, to be Canadian - where you can have both a hereditary head of state and a hereditary head of government....
DEFCON Level
|1|2|[3]|4|5|
Reason: Build up of troops
at the Xiongnu Canal
•Recent News: A fascist regime has taken over Neolvex and won over public support!•
by Albertae » Wed May 18, 2016 4:39 pm
by Hakons » Wed May 18, 2016 5:00 pm
Albertae wrote:This is the dumbest topic ever. There was never a republic. There was never a republic of the United States. The Republican Party was not founded because of that fact.
by Arachaea » Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:59 am
by Novus America » Sun Jun 05, 2016 6:47 am
Arachaea wrote:We need to combine Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the USA and the UK into one United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, North America, Australia and New Zealand! One massive constitutional monarchy / parliamentary democracy to rival the world!
But in all seriousness, if the USA wants to join the Commonwealth, I wouldn't mind.
by Albertae » Sun Jun 05, 2016 11:37 am
Arachaea wrote:We need to combine Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the USA and the UK into one United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, North America, Australia and New Zealand! One massive constitutional monarchy / parliamentary democracy to rival the world!
But in all seriousness, if the USA wants to join the Commonwealth, I wouldn't mind.
by The Christonian Imperium » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:27 pm
by Neolvex » Sat Jun 11, 2016 12:28 pm
The Christonian Imperium wrote:and texas, the Appalachian mountains, the ozarks, the rockies, the planes, and montanna would secede
DEFCON Level
|1|2|[3]|4|5|
Reason: Build up of troops
at the Xiongnu Canal
•Recent News: A fascist regime has taken over Neolvex and won over public support!•
by The Christonian Imperium » Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:45 pm
by Dar es Saalam » Sat Jul 02, 2016 7:34 pm
by The Christonian Imperium » Sat Jul 02, 2016 7:35 pm
Dar es Saalam wrote:I would prefer a fascism form in order to bring things to rights in the US, if we are talking about changing the country's politics so radically. A little anarchy blended in, some fractionalization of the Union and boom, stabilization.
by Socialist Nordia » Sat Jul 02, 2016 8:01 pm
Dar es Saalam wrote:I would prefer a fascism form in order to bring things to rights in the US, if we are talking about changing the country's politics so radically. A little anarchy blended in, some fractionalization of the Union and boom, stabilization.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Dunkirlothesia, Ethel mermania, Great Eddy, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Ravemath, Sarolandia, Statesburg, Untecna, Valentine Z
Advertisement