NATION

PASSWORD

Make America Great Britain Again

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should the United States bring back the monarchy?

YES
228
52%
No
214
48%
 
Total votes : 442

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Sat May 07, 2016 9:35 am

Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Novus America wrote:
Elected monarchies are a thing you know. Generally they are indirectly elected though.


Elected monarchies are an insult to both democracy and monarchy! :p


But seriously, they exist.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elective_monarchy

One could argue the offer benefits of both, and at least keep really shitty children off the throne.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 16673
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Sun May 08, 2016 10:04 am

Sanctissima wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:British imperialism departed North America last century. Unless you want to get rid of all signs Britain was ever in North America, which would require the depopulation of virtually the entire continent.

And the Commonwealth is bad because, obviously, it's an evil plot to maintain British global hegemony and not at all a harmless cultural association promoting democracy, human rights and the rule of law in a not-entirely-successful way. Lyndon LaRouche was right all along. :roll:


-sigh-

Yes, by all means, jump to the absurd.

The Commonwealth is a joke. Every member-State (aside from the UK) pays into it, and for what? So that Britain can grace us with its presence? Honestly, fuck that. The UK should be paying us just for sticking around in this useless organization, not the other way around. We shouldn't be expected to throw lavish receptions and pay for the Queen's expenses every time she feels like taking a trip to the colonies. She has more than enough money to pay for herself.

The only reason the Commonwealth exists is the same reason why the Francophonie or any other culture-based intergovernmental European organization exists. It's because the mother countries can't seem to accept that their empires are dead, and they're desperate to preserve what little illusion of nostalgic imperialism remains. I'm tired of seeing my own country waste millions per year on keeping a vegetative corpse of an empire on life support.

What do you mean, the UK doesn't pay into it? We pay as much as any other Commonwealth member.

Polls carried out by the Royal Commonwealth Society show that support for the Commonwealth is highest in developing countries such as the African members, and lowest in Great Britain itself, so it's hardly the UK that "can't seem to accept that [its] empire [is] dead." And I want to know who you think pays for President Obama's trips to foreign countries. You don't think your country, wherever it may be, pays for state visits by other heads of state? If you live in a commonwealth realm you have even less reason to complain, because the Queen is your head of state- and yet you only pay for her when she is in your country and/or performing duties on behalf of your country. The rest of the time, the Queen's expenses are paid solely by the UK Government, so you get your head of state practically for free.

Basically, you don't know what the Commonwealth is, why it exists or how it works, yet here you are bitching about it because "oh noes muh colonial legacy!!!11." Have fun with all that bitterness, you're the only one that it's hurting.
"Classicist in literature, royalist in politics, and Anglo-Catholic in religion" (T.S. Eliot). Still, unaccountably, a NationStates Moderator.
"Have I done something for the general interest? Well then, I have had my reward. Let this always be present to thy mind, and never stop doing such good." - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations (Book XI, IV)
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Sun May 08, 2016 10:20 am

Novus America wrote:
Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Elected monarchies are an insult to both democracy and monarchy! :p


But seriously, they exist.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elective_monarchy

One could argue the offer benefits of both, and at least keep really shitty children off the throne.


Perhaps they do have some use, I just don't want it to turn into some X factor style popularity contest between a load of mediocrity. Just look at the EU referendum, there is still an absolute lack of truth behind either campaign.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68115
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sun May 08, 2016 10:20 am

Novus America wrote:
Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Elected monarchies are an insult to both democracy and monarchy! :p


But seriously, they exist.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elective_monarchy

One could argue the offer benefits of both, and at least keep really shitty children off the throne.


You mean there are examples aside from Vatican City?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
-Mr Money-
Envoy
 
Posts: 279
Founded: Apr 02, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby -Mr Money- » Sun May 15, 2016 9:38 am

The Romulan Republic wrote:Hereditary monarchy is inherently wrong as it places some people above others on the basis of birth/blood.


Yeah, let's just give some complete stranger power over everyone based on their looks and their ability to come up with a catchy slogan and have his cronies work with special interests to get him there.
:clap:
_[‘ ]_ CAPITALISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(-_Q)

98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig.
_________MARINE________ _____Proud Brexiteer!_____
________@-----------______ Make America Great Again!
_______Présidente!_______ Hillary for PRISON 2017!!!! Proud Classical Liberal
Proud Monarchist, Nationalist, and Capitalist!

User avatar
Hardknock
Envoy
 
Posts: 284
Founded: May 02, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Hardknock » Sun May 15, 2016 10:06 am

Oh sure.
While were talking about evolutionary regressions, lets just dissolve DC and reduce the states to psuedo tribal fuedal baronies that squabble amongst themselves until Persia comes calling. Then we will appoint a great Alexander as a high king to lead our armies to victory.
"Humans, and how I love you talking monkeys for this, know more about war, and treachery of the spirit than any angel."

User avatar
Engleberg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1231
Founded: Apr 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Engleberg » Sun May 15, 2016 10:09 am

-Mr Money- wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:Hereditary monarchy is inherently wrong as it places some people above others on the basis of birth/blood.


Yeah, let's just give some complete stranger power over everyone based on their looks and their ability to come up with a catchy slogan and have his cronies work with special interests to get him there.
:clap:


You sir, are good.
Last edited by Engleberg on Sun May 15, 2016 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Umbrellya wrote:"You are literally the most unashamed German I've ever met."

Wiena wrote:"Engleberg you surely are the most savage guy in the whole game."

West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Anything Left of Center: *exists*
Engle: FUCKING REDS!

User avatar
Arioslavia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Apr 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arioslavia » Sun May 15, 2016 10:10 am

Putin for the US President 2016 :D
Based on Russia - 240 million people - Superpower (do not anger, we have nukes and 5 million army!) - Post-communist, socially liberal gov
Pro: Pragmatic Socialism, Social Liberalism, Leftist Nationalism, Secularism, Women rights, Progressivism, Russia (not always, but sorry - Crimea is Russian), Kemalist Turkey (Glory to Ataturk!), Israel (it's always better than another Islamist dictatorship!)
Neutral: USA, UK (I'm hardline republican but not in the UK case - keep the Monarchy!), EU, China
Anti: Christian Conservatism, Islamism, Erdogan, Clericalism, Saudi Arabia, Current Polish Gov
Male - 22 - straight - Polish - disabled - Russophile - body-positive fat admirer
I don't use NS stats
Feel free to TG me to talk

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Sun May 15, 2016 10:29 am

Arioslavia wrote:Putin for the US President 2016 :D


Loves Putin and Russia. Opposes Christian Conservatism... Yeah cause that makes sense.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Arioslavia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Apr 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arioslavia » Sun May 15, 2016 10:52 am

Novus America wrote:
Arioslavia wrote:Putin for the US President 2016 :D


Loves Putin and Russia. Opposes Christian Conservatism... Yeah cause that makes sense.

Yes, I like Russia, their conservatism and Orthodox revival is much more apparent than the West thinks.
Based on Russia - 240 million people - Superpower (do not anger, we have nukes and 5 million army!) - Post-communist, socially liberal gov
Pro: Pragmatic Socialism, Social Liberalism, Leftist Nationalism, Secularism, Women rights, Progressivism, Russia (not always, but sorry - Crimea is Russian), Kemalist Turkey (Glory to Ataturk!), Israel (it's always better than another Islamist dictatorship!)
Neutral: USA, UK (I'm hardline republican but not in the UK case - keep the Monarchy!), EU, China
Anti: Christian Conservatism, Islamism, Erdogan, Clericalism, Saudi Arabia, Current Polish Gov
Male - 22 - straight - Polish - disabled - Russophile - body-positive fat admirer
I don't use NS stats
Feel free to TG me to talk

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Sun May 15, 2016 11:03 am

Arioslavia wrote:
Novus America wrote:
Loves Putin and Russia. Opposes Christian Conservatism... Yeah cause that makes sense.

Yes, I like Russia, their conservatism and Orthodox revival is much more apparent than the West thinks.


So you like Russian Christian conservatism? They are more clerical and conservative than the west. And also not communist not socialist at all.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun May 15, 2016 11:14 am

Naaah, make America Inca again.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Arioslavia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Apr 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arioslavia » Sun May 15, 2016 11:16 am

Novus America wrote:
Arioslavia wrote:Yes, I like Russia, their conservatism and Orthodox revival is much more apparent than the West thinks.


So you like Russian Christian conservatism? They are more clerical and conservative than the west. And also not communist not socialist at all.

I don't like the Russian Christian conservatism but I still like Russia. You say it's more clerical - it seems to be so for Western observers, but in fact it isn't. I know some Russians, they say that now there's a revival of Orthodox religiousness, but it's rather symbolic and not very deep.
Based on Russia - 240 million people - Superpower (do not anger, we have nukes and 5 million army!) - Post-communist, socially liberal gov
Pro: Pragmatic Socialism, Social Liberalism, Leftist Nationalism, Secularism, Women rights, Progressivism, Russia (not always, but sorry - Crimea is Russian), Kemalist Turkey (Glory to Ataturk!), Israel (it's always better than another Islamist dictatorship!)
Neutral: USA, UK (I'm hardline republican but not in the UK case - keep the Monarchy!), EU, China
Anti: Christian Conservatism, Islamism, Erdogan, Clericalism, Saudi Arabia, Current Polish Gov
Male - 22 - straight - Polish - disabled - Russophile - body-positive fat admirer
I don't use NS stats
Feel free to TG me to talk

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Sun May 15, 2016 11:18 am

Arioslavia wrote:
Novus America wrote:
So you like Russian Christian conservatism? They are more clerical and conservative than the west. And also not communist not socialist at all.

I don't like the Russian Christian conservatism but I still like Russia. You say it's more clerical - it seems to be so for Western observers, but in fact it isn't. I know some Russians, they say that now there's a revival of Orthodox religiousness, but it's rather symbolic and not very deep.


Most relgion everywhere is not deep. That is not unique.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Arioslavia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Apr 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arioslavia » Sun May 15, 2016 11:20 am

Novus America wrote:
Arioslavia wrote:I don't like the Russian Christian conservatism but I still like Russia. You say it's more clerical - it seems to be so for Western observers, but in fact it isn't. I know some Russians, they say that now there's a revival of Orthodox religiousness, but it's rather symbolic and not very deep.


Most relgion everywhere is not deep. That is not unique.

That's true. How is it in the US? Here in Europe we imagine Americans as deeply religious.
Based on Russia - 240 million people - Superpower (do not anger, we have nukes and 5 million army!) - Post-communist, socially liberal gov
Pro: Pragmatic Socialism, Social Liberalism, Leftist Nationalism, Secularism, Women rights, Progressivism, Russia (not always, but sorry - Crimea is Russian), Kemalist Turkey (Glory to Ataturk!), Israel (it's always better than another Islamist dictatorship!)
Neutral: USA, UK (I'm hardline republican but not in the UK case - keep the Monarchy!), EU, China
Anti: Christian Conservatism, Islamism, Erdogan, Clericalism, Saudi Arabia, Current Polish Gov
Male - 22 - straight - Polish - disabled - Russophile - body-positive fat admirer
I don't use NS stats
Feel free to TG me to talk

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sun May 15, 2016 11:23 am

Arioslavia wrote:That's true. How is it in the US? Here in Europe we imagine Americans as deeply religious.

Most Americans are not. There's a small (but reliably voting) evangelical minority, but most Americans are cafeteria Christians who have a vague belief in Christianity but not a lot of interest in it.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10825
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Sun May 15, 2016 12:02 pm

Liriena wrote:Naaah, make America Inca again.


Time to learn the Inca language (Quechua) - Fast forward to 2:19 which is where the learning really starts - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYSRzIMSTxY - :lol:
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
-Mr Money-
Envoy
 
Posts: 279
Founded: Apr 02, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby -Mr Money- » Sun May 15, 2016 2:36 pm

Engleberg wrote:
-Mr Money- wrote:
Yeah, let's just give some complete stranger power over everyone based on their looks and their ability to come up with a catchy slogan and have his cronies work with special interests to get him there.
:clap:


You sir, are good.


Thank you
:blush:
_[‘ ]_ CAPITALISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(-_Q)

98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig.
_________MARINE________ _____Proud Brexiteer!_____
________@-----------______ Make America Great Again!
_______Présidente!_______ Hillary for PRISON 2017!!!! Proud Classical Liberal
Proud Monarchist, Nationalist, and Capitalist!

User avatar
Legatia
Minister
 
Posts: 2894
Founded: Nov 30, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Legatia » Sun May 15, 2016 5:19 pm

oh my god

please stop

User avatar
Noraika
Minister
 
Posts: 2589
Founded: Nov 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Noraika » Sun May 15, 2016 5:21 pm

Legatia wrote:oh my god

please stop

You're going to have to be specific, friend. :)
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
TRANSEQUALITY~
~ Economic Left -9.38 | Social Libertarian -2.77 ~
~ 93 Equality - 36 Liberty - 50 Stability ~

Democratic Socialism ● Egalitarianism ● Feminism ● LGBT+ rights ● Monarchism ● Social Justice ● Souverainism ● Statism


Pronouns: She/Her ♀️
Pagan and proud! ⛦
Gender and sex aren't the same thing!

User avatar
District XIV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5990
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby District XIV » Sun May 15, 2016 5:23 pm

-Mr Money- wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:Hereditary monarchy is inherently wrong as it places some people above others on the basis of birth/blood.


Yeah, let's just give some complete stranger power over everyone based on their looks and their ability to come up with a catchy slogan and have his cronies work with special interests to get him there.
:clap:

Yeah, let's just give some royal piece of shit ceremonial power over everyone else based on the family and socioeconomic status he was born to. :roll:

User avatar
United Earthlings
Minister
 
Posts: 2033
Founded: Aug 17, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby United Earthlings » Sun May 15, 2016 5:35 pm

You got it backwards, under Article 4, Section 3 the constitute parts of the United Kingdom can apply for statehood and once granted statehood under Article 6 propose Amendments to said Constitution.

Who wouldn't want to join the "more perfect Union"? :p
Last edited by United Earthlings on Sun May 15, 2016 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Commonwealth Defence Export|OC Thread for Storefront|Write-Ups
Embassy Page|Categories Types

You may delay, but time will not, therefore make sure to enjoy the time you've wasted.

Welcome to the NSverse, where funding priorities and spending levels may seem very odd, to say the least.

User avatar
Gem Home World
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: May 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Gem Home World » Sun May 15, 2016 5:36 pm

ANARCO-CAPITALISM! PRIVATIZE THE ATMOSPHERE!

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5385
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Sun May 15, 2016 5:42 pm

So you mean we should rejoin a kingdom that we forcibly broke away from and then fought a total of two wars against them to maintain a Republican form of government because we don't have very good Presidential choices? please, if any former colony should join you over shitty leadership you should focus of recolonizing Africa.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Hakons
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5619
Founded: Jul 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakons » Sun May 15, 2016 7:11 pm

-Mr Money- wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:Hereditary monarchy is inherently wrong as it places some people above others on the basis of birth/blood.


Yeah, let's just give some complete stranger power over everyone based on their looks and their ability to come up with a catchy slogan and have his cronies work with special interests to get him there.
:clap:


If a poor leader is elected into power, it is the fault of the populous. If a poor leader inherits the power, it is the fault of the government system. Furthermore, poor leaders can be elected out of office in the next election while a nation is stuck with a poor monarch. When it comes to representing the people of a nation (the purpose of government), rule by popular vote will always be better than rule by whoever happens to be born into it.
“All elements of the national life must be made to drink in the Life which proceedeth from Him: legislation, political institutions, education, marriage and family life, capital and labour.” —Pope Leo XIII

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, El Lazaro, Hwiteard, Lothria, Niolia, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Sarduri, Shrillland, Simonia, Statesburg, Tungstan, Uiiop, Washington Resistance Army, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads