Advertisement

by Stormopolis » Sun May 15, 2016 1:46 pm

by Quokkastan » Sun May 15, 2016 1:48 pm
Obarland wrote:Texas would be the best option BY FAR
They have tons of money, the fastest growing economy in the usa, the fastest growing population in the usa, tons of oil and other natural resources, and their own military.

by Sanctissima » Sun May 15, 2016 1:55 pm

by United States of Natan » Sun May 15, 2016 2:15 pm
American Imperial State wrote:If the U.S. dissolved into 50 independent countries, what state would you obtain citizenship for and why?
This is just out of curiosity. Let's assume you could only claim citizenship through birth, relation or current residency. What state would you like to have citizenship for despite any such restrictions? Would it be for political/family/economic reasons?
I'd like to have Florida citizenship but I probably only qualify for Maryland or Oklahoma citizenship based on birth and residency. My mom probably qualifies for Ohio citizenship by birth and relation.
I'd like to have Florida citizenship because that's where I grew up and the economy and natural resources are sufficient. It's possible we'd end up in a union with the weaker southern states to balance New York, California and texas which would probably dominate the region.
Then it's a lie. Everything Fox News says is a lie.
Even true things once said on Fox News become lies.
(Family Guy: Excellence in Broadcasting)

by APPALAtCHIA » Sun May 15, 2016 4:39 pm

by South Naples » Sun May 15, 2016 4:41 pm

by United States of Natan » Sun May 15, 2016 4:56 pm
South Naples wrote:Alaska, we can't be threatened by other states. And if we did, We would join Canada
Then it's a lie. Everything Fox News says is a lie.
Even true things once said on Fox News become lies.
(Family Guy: Excellence in Broadcasting)

by New confederate ramenia » Sun May 15, 2016 4:58 pm
Appalatchia wrote:New York. I want to be in one of the few states that would likely be able to maintain an independent economy, but I hate the weather in Texas and California.

by Crettia » Sun May 15, 2016 5:43 pm

by South Naples » Sun May 15, 2016 6:11 pm

by Quokkastan » Sun May 15, 2016 6:16 pm

by West Verrica » Mon May 16, 2016 7:36 am

by AiliailiA » Mon May 16, 2016 8:13 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by Cymrea » Mon May 16, 2016 8:59 am

by The Last Stars » Mon May 16, 2016 9:49 am

by Maljaratas » Mon May 16, 2016 10:30 am
Cymrea wrote:United States of Natan wrote:What's Canada gonna do? politely protest when you get invaded?
Probably respond as a unified nation with a cohesive military rather than a mongrel mess of fifty bastard children no longer unified or cohesive.
Then maybe adopt some of those children. Teach them "please" and "thank you". And hockey.

by The Last Stars » Mon May 16, 2016 10:33 am
Maljaratas wrote:Cymrea wrote:Probably respond as a unified nation with a cohesive military rather than a mongrel mess of fifty bastard children no longer unified or cohesive.
Then maybe adopt some of those children. Teach them "please" and "thank you". And hockey.
So would Minnesota be like the kid Canada should have, instead of the US?

by Maljaratas » Mon May 16, 2016 10:35 am

by Quokkastan » Mon May 16, 2016 10:41 am

by Jamzmania » Mon May 16, 2016 10:52 am
Crettia wrote:I would go to Texas
Most likely one of the states would invade the other states and reunite the Nation
But Canada and Mexico will also try to split the USA between themselves.
And Hawaii would easily just stay independent. Just like before the US annexed it
The Alexanderians wrote:"Fear no man or woman,
No matter what their size.
Call upon me,
And I will equalize."
-Engraved on the side of my M1911 .45

by Leistung Empire » Mon May 16, 2016 11:04 am

Leistenije Heute:"No end in sight" for ongoing joint session in parliament as both sides fail to agree on resolution abolishing communist party dominance, removing affiliated symbols from state usage. // Soviet presence on Leistenian border lessens in midst of emergency summit in Budapest, Austria-Hungary.
by Free Missouri » Thu May 19, 2016 10:50 pm

by Quokkastan » Fri May 20, 2016 1:44 am
Free Missouri wrote:I'd stay in Missouri because we are the only state with nuclear fuel/weapons production plants, nuclear weapons sites, AND nuclear power all rolled into one. We also get the B-2s. Oh, and did I mention we also have some large reserves of uranium under us? and we have lead for bullets and radiation shielding, limestone which is good both for building above ground and makes it easy to dig out large bunkers and whatnot. And the US's CBRN Program and supply depot is at Ft. Leonard Wood.
And, if we absolutely had to, we could take one of those nukes and detonate them deep underground to totally destroy Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi, and parts of Alabama. Meanwhile we'd just move all our people up into the limestone hills where the makeup of the rocks lets the vibrations dissipate without any major damage.
We'd have control over the two major rivers as far as agricultural and coal transport goes, we'd basically control northern Arkansas's major water sources. In the event of a major levee-breaching flood we could keep up our spillway and bring nearby states to their knees, We have the military division of Boeing headquartered in STL, and, finally, we produce the best craft beers and the best wine in the US (suck it Napa valley. we provided france with grapeseeds when their planets were ravaged by disease. French wine is actually Missouri wine.)
Fuck. With. Us.

by Alvecia » Fri May 20, 2016 1:48 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cole Whyte-Gurney, Google [Bot], Page, Perchan
Advertisement