It's surprising you continue not to answer my question.
Advertisement
by White Sox » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:42 am
White Sox wrote:Ifreann wrote:Did you not read my post?
One party wants the pregnancy to be terminated. The other party doesn't.
Who wins?
Except mine is simply a suggestion. This should have been clear that these were suggestions rather than what should be enforced.
Going back to your point, once again should be consulted with each other and whatever the outcome should be left at that.
by Ifreann » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:50 am
White Sox wrote:Ifreann wrote:It's surprising you continue not to answer my question.White Sox wrote:Except mine is simply a suggestion. This should have been clear that these were suggestions rather than what should be enforced.
Going back to your point, once again should be consulted with each other and whatever the outcome should be left at that.
Suffering selective reading is widespread
by White Sox » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:51 am
by The Alma Mater » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:58 am
by White Sox » Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:03 am
White Sox wrote:whatever the outcome should be left at that.
White Sox wrote:Should still be of mutual agreement but after that any sort of discussion or action is their choice
by Alimprad » Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:03 am
Zoice wrote:What separates a fetus from something like a puppy, which while it is heartbreaking to kill it, most people would agree you can kill it to remove it if it's lodged in your body and you want it out.
Ailiailia wrote:To use "a child has a right to care and protection from their mother" as justification for "a fetus has a right to care and protection from its host" fails, because in the former case it is possible for someone else to provide. In the latter case it is not.
Rather fine distinctions like that are why analogies can imperceptibly lead to absurd conclusions, and thus why analogies should only ever be illustrative not the foundation of an argument.
Soldati senza confini wrote:By your logic, we should give the right to life to bacteria, and forget about pasteurization cause #bacterialifematters.
by The V O I D » Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:06 am
by Ardavia » Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:06 am
Alimprad wrote:Zoice wrote:What separates a fetus from something like a puppy, which while it is heartbreaking to kill it, most people would agree you can kill it to remove it if it's lodged in your body and you want it out.
The fact that the foetus' 'lodging' in a pregnant woman's body is a normal function of the body which it is built to cope with.
Or maybe by my logic we should give all humans the right to life, and forget about murdering and abortion cause #humanlifematters.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:10 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by The Alma Mater » Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:12 am
White Sox wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:
He is right you know - "they should work it out together" is not an answer to "what if they cannot work it out together".
If you haven't read my post, then you probably suffer from selective reading.White Sox wrote:whatever the outcome should be left at that.White Sox wrote:Should still be of mutual agreement but after that any sort of discussion or action is their choice
by Farnhamia » Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:14 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: El Rio De Juan, Mutualist Chaos, Nu Elysium, Ors Might, Pasong Tirad, The Black Forrest, The Vooperian Union
Advertisement