NATION

PASSWORD

[DEFEATED] WA Peacekeeping Charter

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8067
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

[DEFEATED] WA Peacekeeping Charter

Postby Excidium Planetis » Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:53 pm

"Originally Madam Schultz intended this to be a partial replacement of GA#2, but I think I can work it in without any contradiction of Article 10." Blackbourne states as he reopens the debate chamber. "Of course, I have had to limit the scope of the resolution."

14th Draft:
WA Peacekeeping Charter
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The Assembly of Worlds,

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body, and that an international organization dedicated to this effort would be of great use,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Article I - Restrictions on WA Force

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens thereof, or organizations affiliated with such states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. WA personnel are committee members and employees of the WA.

Article II - Scope of Peacekeeping Operations and Standards

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, whose goal shall be to prevent and end conflict, and preserve peace. Peacekeepers shall adhere to these principles:
  • Consent of all parties involved in its operations. No peacekeeping effort shall be made without the consent of all WA member nations involved, and without the request of at least one member nation involved.
  • Impartiality in proceedings and conflicts. Peacekeepers shall maintain professionalism at all times and give equal consideration to the involved parties.
  • Non-use of force. Except in cases of self defense, Peacekeepers are to refrain from using lethal force, and shall be prohibited from carrying lethal weapons. Peacekeepers are to avoid using non-lethal force on state actors.

Tasks the WA Peacekeepers with the following duties:
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in disarmament and demobilizing of military forces,
  • Organization of elections or government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof
  • Monitoring the fulfillment of obligations created by armistices or ceasefires
  • Protection of the WA-recognized rights of citizens of member nations and support for the rule of law
  • Assistance in international mediation and resolving potential causes for international conflict

Prohibits the WA from expanding the role of the WA Peacekeepers to include any efforts that cannot be considered one of the above duties;

Further tasks Peacekeepers with:
  • Maintaining the legitimacy of WA actions
  • Actively involving national and local governments in its operations to promote personal ownership over the success of Peacekeeping operations
  • Forming clear and achievable mandates in Peacekeeping efforts;

Authorizes the WA Peacekeepers to:
  • request appropriate WA funds to support its operations,
  • conduct research into safe and effective non-lethal weapons systems, armor, and defense technologies to increase the safety of WA personnel

Clarifies that the WA Peacekeepers are not a military force, nor are they ever to be used as such,

Article III - Responsibility of Member Nation-States

Encourages WA Member nations to make a genuine commitment to maintaining peace, maintain a Unity of Purpose with the WA, actively support Peacekeeping efforts where possible, refrain from hindering WA operations or movement, and communicate effectively with WA personnel

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally launching military, terrorist, or criminal attacks against WA property or officials.


WA Peacekeeping Charter
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The Assembly of Worlds,

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body, and that an international organization dedicated to this effort would be of great use,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Article I - Restrictions on WA Force

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens thereof, or organizations affiliated with such states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, et cetera are not WA personnel;

Article II - Scope of Peacekeeping Operations and Standards

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, whose goal shall be to prevent and end conflict, and preserve peace. Peacekeepers shall adhere to these principles:
  • Consent of all parties involved in its operations. No peacekeeping effort shall be made without the consent of all WA member nations involved, and without the request of at least one member nation involved.
  • Impartiality in proceedings and conflicts. Peacekeepers shall maintain professionalism at all times and give equal consideration to the involved parties.
  • Non-use of force. Except in cases of self defense, Peacekeepers are to refrain from using lethal force, and shall be prohibited from carrying lethal weapons. Peacekeepers are to avoid using non-lethal force on state actors.

Tasks the WA Peacekeepers with the following duties:
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in disarmament and demobilizing of military forces,
  • Organization of elections or government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof
  • Monitoring the fulfillment of obligations created by armistices or ceasefires
  • Protection of the WA-recognized rights of citizens of member nations and support for the rule of law
  • Assistance in international mediation and resolving potential causes for international conflict

Prohibits the WA from expanding the role of the WA Peacekeepers to include any efforts that cannot be considered one of the above duties;

Further tasks Peacekeepers with:
  • Maintaining the legitimacy of WA actions
  • Actively involving national and local governments in its operations to promote personal ownership over the success of Peacekeeping operations
  • Forming clear and achievable mandates in Peacekeeping efforts;

Authorizes the WA Peacekeepers to:
  • request appropriate WA funds to support its operations,
  • conduct research into safe and effective non-lethal weapons systems, armor, and defense technologies to increase the safety of WA personnel

Clarifies that the WA Peacekeepers are not a military force, nor are they ever to be used as such,

Article III - Responsibility of Member Nation-States

Encourages WA Member nations to make a genuine commitment to maintaining peace, maintain a Unity of Purpose with the WA, actively support Peacekeeping efforts where possible, refrain from hindering WA operations or movement, and communicate effectively with WA personnel

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally launching military, terrorist, or criminal attacks against WA property or officials.


WA Peacekeeping Charter
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The Assembly of Worlds,

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body, and that an international organization dedicated to this effort would be of great use,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Article I - Restrictions on WA Force

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens thereof, or organizations affiliated with such states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, et cetera are not WA personnel;

Article II - Scope of Peacekeeping Operations and Standards

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, whose goal shall be to prevent and end conflict, and preserve peace. Peacekeepers shall adhere to these principles:
  • Consent of all parties involved in its operations. No peacekeeping effort shall be made without the consent of all WA member nations involved, and without the request of at least one member nation involved.
  • Impartiality in proceedings and conflicts. Peacekeepers shall maintain professionalism at all times and give equal consideration to the involved parties.
  • Non-use of force. Except in cases of self defense, Peacekeepers are to refrain from using lethal force, and shall be prohibited from carrying lethal weapons. Peacekeepers are to avoid using non-lethal force on state actors.

Tasks the WA Peacekeepers with the following duties:
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in disarmament and demobilizing of military forces,
  • Organization of elections or government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof
  • Monitoring the fulfillment of obligations created by armistices or ceasefires
  • Protection of the WA-recognized rights of citizens of member nations and support for the rule of law
  • Assistance in international mediation and resolving potential causes for international conflict

Prohibits the WA from expanding the role of the WA Peacekeepers to include any efforts that cannot be considered one of the above duties;

Further tasks Peacekeepers with:
  • Maintaining a public perception of the legitimacy of WA actions
  • Actively involving national and local governments in its operations to promote personal ownership over the success of Peacekeeping operations
  • Forming clear and achievable mandates in Peacekeeping efforts;

Authorizes the WA Peacekeepers to:
  • request appropriate WA funds to support its operations,
  • conduct research into safe and effective non-lethal weapons systems, armor, and defense technologies to increase the safety of WA personnel

Clarifies that the WA Peacekeepers are not a military force, nor are they ever to be used as such,

Article III - Responsibility of Member Nation-States

Encourages WA Member nations to make a genuine commitment to maintaining peace, maintain a Unity of Purpose with the WA, actively support Peacekeeping efforts where possible, refrain from hindering WA operations or movement, and communicate effectively with WA personnel

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally launching military, terrorist, or criminal attacks against WA property or officials.


WA Peacekeeping Charter
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The Assembly of Worlds,

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Article I - Restrictions on WA Use of Force

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, et cetera are not WA personnel;

Article II - Scope of Peacekeeping Operations and Standards

Establishes the World Entities Advanced Peacekeeping Operations Network, whose goal shall be to prevent conflict, work to end hostilities, and preserve peace. The WEAPON and its personnel, hereafter referred to as WA Peacekeepers, shall adhere to the following principles:
  • Consent of all parties involved in its operations. No peacekeeping effort shall be made without the consent of all WA member nations involved, and without the request of at least one member nation involved.
  • Impartiality in proceedings and conflicts. The WA Peacekeepers shall maintain professionalism at all times and give equal consideration to the involved parties.
  • Non-use of force. Except in cases of self defense, the WA Peacekeepers are to refrain from using lethal force, and shall be prohibited from carrying lethal weapons. Peacekeepers are strongly encouraged to avoid using less-than-lethal force on state actors.

Tasks the WA Peacekeepers with the following duties:
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Assistance in disarmament operations
  • Organization of elections or government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof
  • Monitoring the fulfilment of obligations created by armistices or ceasefires
  • Protection of the WA-recognized rights of citizens of member nations and support for the rule of law
  • Assistance in international mediation
  • Resolving potential causes for international conflict

Prohibits the WA Peacekeepers from engaging in any efforts that cannot be considered to be one of the duties outlined above;

Further tasks the WA Peacekeepers with:
  • Maintaining a public perception of the legitimacy of WA actions
  • Actively involving national and local governments in its operations to promote personal ownership over the success of Peacekeeping operations
  • Coordinating with the International Mediation Foundation and any other applicable WA organizations where helpful in fulfilling the duties of the WA Peacekeepers
  • Form clear and achievable mandates in Peacekeeping efforts;

Authorizes the WEAPON to:
  • request appropriate funding from the GAO to support its operations,
  • appoint envoys to meet with parties involved in peacekeeping efforts for facilitation of international mediation,
  • conduct research into safe and effective less-than-lethal weapons systems, armor, and defensive technologies which will increase the safety of WA personnel

Clarifies that the WA Peacekeepers are not a military force, nor are they ever to be used as such,

Article III - Responsibility of Member Nation-States

Encourages WA Member nations to make a genuine commitment to maintaining peace, maintain a Unity of Purpose with the WA, actively support Peacekeeping efforts where possible, refrain from hindering WA operations or movement, and communicate effectively with WA personnel

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally launching military, terrorist, or criminal attacks against WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The Assembly of Worlds,

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, et cetera are not WA personnel;

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific peacekeeping effort:
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof
  • Monitoring the fulfilment of obligations created by armistices or ceasefires

Prohibits the WA Peacekeepers from engaging in any efforts that cannot be considered to be one of the duties outlined above;

Further tasks the WA Peacekeepers with coordinating with the International Mediation Foundation and any other applicable WA organizations where helpful in fulfilling the duties of the WA Peacekeepers;

Clarifies that the WA Peacekeepers are not a military force, nor are they ever to be used as such, nor shall they be required to carry arms;

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally launching military, terrorist, or criminal attacks against WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The Assembly of Worlds,

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, et cetera are not WA personnel;

Allows WA officials and personnel to defend themselves and WA property with force, including deadly force, if threatened by WA member nations, non-WA nations, organizations, or individuals;

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific peacekeeping effort:
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof
  • Monitoring the fulfilment of obligations created by armistices or ceasefires

Prohibits the WA Peacekeepers from engaging in any efforts that cannot be considered to be one of the duties outlined above;

Further tasks the WA Peacekeepers with coordinating with the International Mediation Foundation and any other applicable WA organizations where helpful in fulfilling the duties of the WA Peacekeepers.

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA cooperation efforts, and from intentionally launching military, terrorist, or criminal attacks against WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The Assembly of Worlds,

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, et cetera are not WA personnel;

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific peacekeeping effort:
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof
  • Monitoring the fulfilment of obligations created by armistices or ceasefires

Prohibits the WA Peacekeepers from engaging in any efforts that cannot be considered to be one of the duties outlined above;

Further tasks the WA Peacekeepers with coordinating with the International Mediation Foundation and any other applicable WA organizations where helpful in fulfilling the duties of the WA Peacekeepers.

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA cooperation efforts, and from intentionally attacking WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The World Assembly

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, et cetera are not WA personnel.

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific peacekeeping effort:
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof

Prohibits the WA Peacekeepers from engaging in any efforts not outlined above.

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA cooperation efforts, and from intentionally attacking WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The World Assembly

Noting the [presumed] absence of legislation preventing WA military intervention in international and national conflicts,

Seeking to prevent the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, et cetera are not WA personnel.

Allows WA organizations, committees, and officials to defend themselves and WA property with deadly force if threatened by WA member nations, non-WA nations, organizations, or individuals;

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific peacekeeping effort:
  • Protection of civilian non-combatants in times of war or civil strife
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof

Prohibits the WA Peacekeepers from engaging in any efforts not outlined above.

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA cooperation efforts, and from intentionally attacking WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The World Assembly

Noting the [presumed] absence of legislation preventing WA military intervention in international and national conflicts,

Seeking to prevent the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions, by any means other than through the law-courts;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, er cetera are not WA personnel.

Allows WA organizations, committees, and officials to defend themselves and WA property with deadly force if threatened by WA member nations, non-WA nations, organizations, or individuals;

Establishes the WA International Cooperation Force, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific cooperation effort:
  • Protection of civilian non-combatants in times of war or civil strife
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof

Prohibits the WA International Cooperation Force from engaging in any efforts not outlined above.

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA cooperation efforts, and from intentionally attacking WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The World Assembly

Noting the [presumed] absence of legislation preventing WA military intervention in international and national conflicts,

Seeking to prevent the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, er cetera are not WA personnel.

Allows WA organizations, committees, and officials to defend themselves and WA property with deadly force if threatened by WA member nations, non-WA nations, organizations, or individuals;

Establishes the WA Friendship Force, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific friendship effort:
  • Protection of civilian non-combatants in times of war or civil strife
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof

Prohibits the WA Friendship Force from engaging in any efforts not outlined above.

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA friendship efforts, and from intentionally attacking WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Global Disarmament | Mild | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The World Assembly

Noting the [presumed] absence of legislation preventing WA military intervention in international and national conflicts,

Seeking to prevent the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions.

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. National delegations, staff, er cetera are not WA personnel.

Allows WA organizations, committees, and officials to defend themselves and WA property with deadly force if threatened by WA member nations, non-WA nations, organizations, or individuals;

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific effort:
  • Protection of civilian non-combatants in times of war or civil strife
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof

Prohibits the WA Peacekeepers from engaging in any efforts not outlined above.

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally attacking WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Health | International Aid | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The World Assembly

Noting the [presumed] absence of legislation preventing WA military intervention in international and national,

Seeking to prevent the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions.

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property.

Allows WA organizations, committees, and officials to defend themselves and WA property with deadly force if threatened by WA member nations, non-WA nations, organizations, or individuals;

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, which shall have the following duties, provided at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in each specific effort:
  • Protection of civilian non-combatants in times of war or civil strife
  • Assistance in Disarmament
  • Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society
  • Assistance in demobilizing military forces
  • Government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof
[/list][/list]

Prohibits the WA Peacekeepers from engaging in any efforts not outlined above.

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally attacking WA property or officials.


On WA Peacekeeping
~Flavor Text~

Category: Health | International Aid | Proposed by: Excidium Planetis





The World Assembly

Noting the [presumed] absence of legislation preventing WA military intervention in international and national,

Seeking to prevent the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military with any WA member states, citizens of member states, or organizations affiliated with member states, for any reason whatsoever,

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions.

Allows WA organizations, committees, and officials to defend themselves and WA property with deadly force if threatened by WA member nations, non-WA nations, organizations, or individuals,

Allows WA organizations and committees to engage in peacekeeping efforts, at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in said efforts, including protection of civilian non-combatants, disarmament, demobilization of military forces, societal reintegration of former combatants, government reorganization or establishment, and monitoring of elections, and

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally attacking WA property or officials.


"Yeah, this needs work." Cornelia Schultz says as she reads over her draft. "But at least it will show those Wads I'm trying, right?"
Last edited by Wrapper on Mon Nov 21, 2016 5:14 am, edited 30 times in total.
Current Ambassador: Adelia Meritt
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 9 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.

User avatar
We Couldnt Agree On A Name
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Nov 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby We Couldnt Agree On A Name » Mon Mar 21, 2016 2:17 am

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military operations with any WA member states


Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations

SC Liberations?
Last edited by We Couldnt Agree On A Name on Mon Mar 21, 2016 2:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
World Assembly Representative: Ms. Adriene Beaumont | "We write legislation here, not dictionaries."
I'll use stats when you fix 443.3

User avatar
Louisistan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 811
Founded: Sep 10, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Louisistan » Mon Mar 21, 2016 2:49 am

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions.

So... you want us to become entirely toothless?
Knight of TITO

User avatar
Jarish Inyo
Diplomat
 
Posts: 981
Founded: Jul 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jarish Inyo » Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:03 am

Louisistan wrote:
Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions.

So... you want us to become entirely toothless?


The WA is already toothless.
Ambassador Nameless
Empire of Jaresh Inyo

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Mon Mar 21, 2016 4:36 am

"Not interested in gutting the compliance mechanism of the WA. No."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
Diplomat
 
Posts: 607
Founded: Mar 05, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper » Mon Mar 21, 2016 4:46 am

Are you serious?

Excidium Planetis wrote:Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions.

No. The gnomes have a job to do and they do it well, without resorting to military action.

Excidium Planetis wrote:Allows WA organizations and committees to engage in peacekeeping efforts, at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in said efforts, including protection of civilian non-combatants, disarmament, demobilization of military forces, societal reintegration of former combatants, government reorganization or establishment, and monitoring of elections, and

No. We know what "peacekeeping" means, ambassador. It means violence. Let individual militant WA nations do this. We won't pay a wadded-up half-chewed piece of gum toward any so-called "peacekeeping" effort.
The General Assembly Delegation of the Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper:
-- Wad Ari Alaz, Wrapperian Ambassador to the WA; Author, SCR#200, GAR #300, GAR#361.
-- Wad Ahume Orliss-Dorcke, Deputy Ambassador; two-time Intergalactic Karaoke League champion.
-- Wad Dawei DeGoah, Ambassador Emeritus; deceased.
THE GA POSTS FROM THIS NATION ARE IN-CHARACTER AND SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN AS MODERATOR RULINGS.

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8067
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Excidium Planetis » Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:28 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:"Not interested in gutting the compliance mechanism of the WA. No."

"Compliance... Mechanism? What are you on about, Ambassador?"

The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:Are you serious?

Excidium Planetis wrote:Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from enforcing WA compliance or taking action against WA members for any acts of non-compliance with WA resolutions.

No. The gnomes have a job to do and they do it well, without resorting to military action.

"The gnomes do not do their job well, as a certain dolphin-hating Ambassador can likely attest. Anyways, the sheer number of non-complying nations, which you have seen, should be proof enough that nothing is enforced. This clause serves as a WA police ban."

Excidium Planetis wrote:Allows WA organizations and committees to engage in peacekeeping efforts, at the request or consent of all WA member nations involved in said efforts, including protection of civilian non-combatants, disarmament, demobilization of military forces, societal reintegration of former combatants, government reorganization or establishment, and monitoring of elections, and

No. We know what "peacekeeping" means, ambassador. It means violence. Let individual militant WA nations do this. We won't pay a wadded-up half-chewed piece of gum toward any so-called "peacekeeping" effort.

"That is certainly not what leave keeping means. Peacekeeping is not, and has been, a synonym for violence. Examples of peacekeepkg efforts were listed. Do you really think 'monitoring of elections' means violence? What about 'disarmament'? How does any of that lead you to believe that this allows violence?"

OOC:
In Real Life, the services I listed are the real life services UN Peacekeepers provide. To my knowledge, UN Peacekeepers have never served as a military force, and have never engaged in offensive operations (No, Korean War does not count, that was UN Command, not UN Peacekeepers).

We Couldnt Agree On A Name wrote:
Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military operations with any WA member states


Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations

SC Liberations?


"Please explain how a Liberation could possibly be used in a defensive capacity. Furthermore the clause clearly prevents WA organizations or committees, not WA members, from engaging in military operations. If your regional military wants to go invade some other region, that is not a WA organization."
Current Ambassador: Adelia Meritt
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 9 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.

User avatar
Jarish Inyo
Diplomat
 
Posts: 981
Founded: Jul 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jarish Inyo » Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:29 am

How would the WA go about forming it's peacekeeping force? Would it require nations to donate troops and material? Or would it use a new type of gnome and purchase material?
Ambassador Nameless
Empire of Jaresh Inyo

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2151
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abacathea » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:53 am

Excidium Planetis wrote:
"Please explain how a Liberation could possibly be used in a defensive capacity. Furthermore the clause clearly prevents WA organizations or committees, not WA members, from engaging in military operations. If your regional military wants to go invade some other region, that is not a WA organization."


I'm very surprised how you can't see how it's used in a defensive capacity given that a liberation's sole function is to unlock the gates to the city to allow defenders in. It IS a defensive tool, of a WA organization which would be prohibited under this piece, underline mine;

"Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations,"

A liberation is the biproduct of a WA organization and a defensive fruit produced from the WA tree.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:53 am

It's also an OOC device, has nothing to do with the General Assembly, and besides, does not directly involve any military action whatsoever. It just removes a password. It does not require the WA to participate in any ensuing military activities at all.
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:55 am

Excidium Planetis wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:"Not interested in gutting the compliance mechanism of the WA. No."

"Compliance... Mechanism? What are you on about, Ambassador?"

I'm curious too.
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8067
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Excidium Planetis » Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:26 am

Jarish Inyo wrote:How would the WA go about forming it's peacekeeping force? Would it require nations to donate troops and material? Or would it use a new type of gnome and purchase material?


"What WA Peacekeeping force? There is no such thing."

Abacathea wrote:
Excidium Planetis wrote:
"Please explain how a Liberation could possibly be used in a defensive capacity. Furthermore the clause clearly prevents WA organizations or committees, not WA members, from engaging in military operations. If your regional military wants to go invade some other region, that is not a WA organization."


I'm very surprised how you can't see how it's used in a defensive capacity given that a liberation's sole function is to unlock the gates to the city to allow defenders in.

"Unlocking the gates to a city to allow attackers in is an offensive operation, not a defensive one. In the case of all liberations, they are aimed at assisting an invasion of a region by military forces hostile to the current ruling regional government. Whether or not that government is a foreign occupation force or not is irrelevant."

Abacathea wrote:It IS a defensive tool, of a WA organization which would be prohibited under this piece, underline mine;

"Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations,"

A liberation is the biproduct of a WA organization and a defensive fruit produced from the WA tree.


Some weird OOC/IC hybrid happening. I blame the SC.

"No. Liberations do not allow WA nations to defend themselves, they specifically aid in striking down defensive barriers to a region, which assists in offensive operations by a force, regardless of whether that force is a 'defender' or 'invader' force."
Last edited by Excidium Planetis on Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Current Ambassador: Adelia Meritt
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 9 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.

User avatar
We Couldnt Agree On A Name
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Nov 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby We Couldnt Agree On A Name » Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:10 pm

Excidium Planetis wrote:"No. Liberations do not allow WA nations to defend themselves, they specifically aid in striking down defensive barriers to a region, which assists in offensive operations by a force, regardless of whether that force is a 'defender' or 'invader' force."

They're almost invariably used to prevent raiders from taking complete control of the region.
Last edited by We Couldnt Agree On A Name on Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
World Assembly Representative: Ms. Adriene Beaumont | "We write legislation here, not dictionaries."
I'll use stats when you fix 443.3

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12664
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:13 pm

We Couldnt Agree On A Name wrote:
Excidium Planetis wrote:"No. Liberations do not allow WA nations to defend themselves, they specifically aid in striking down defensive barriers to a region, which assists in offensive operations by a force, regardless of whether that force is a 'defender' or 'invader' force."

They're almost invariably used to prevent raiders from taking complete control of the region.

That is because only defenders can win the votes necessary to liberate a region.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8067
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Excidium Planetis » Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:15 pm

We Couldnt Agree On A Name wrote:
Excidium Planetis wrote:"No. Liberations do not allow WA nations to defend themselves, they specifically aid in striking down defensive barriers to a region, which assists in offensive operations by a force, regardless of whether that force is a 'defender' or 'invader' force."

They're almost invariably used to prevent raiders from taking complete control of the region.


"Three words: 'Liberate Nazi Europe'. Anyways..." Schultz trails off. "Liberations are an offensive tool most often used by defenders to take back regions invading forces currently occupy. But that's still an offensive, not a defensive operation."
Current Ambassador: Adelia Meritt
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 9 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8067
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Excidium Planetis » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:46 pm

"I'm considering a redraft which removes the second 'Allows' clause and instead creates a committee called the WA Peacekeepers and specifically outlines their duties, which are all non-combat and are the actions outlined in the current second 'Allows' clause.

"What do you think?"
Current Ambassador: Adelia Meritt
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 9 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.

User avatar
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
Diplomat
 
Posts: 607
Founded: Mar 05, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper » Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:31 am

(Ari throws his hands up in disgust, but Ahume raises an eyebrow, and whispers in Ari's ear. Ari snorts, but then looks back at Ahume, who nods his head.)

ARI: Hmm. Okay. Add a clause that says no WA personnel can carry any weapons, and we'll consider it.
The General Assembly Delegation of the Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper:
-- Wad Ari Alaz, Wrapperian Ambassador to the WA; Author, SCR#200, GAR #300, GAR#361.
-- Wad Ahume Orliss-Dorcke, Deputy Ambassador; two-time Intergalactic Karaoke League champion.
-- Wad Dawei DeGoah, Ambassador Emeritus; deceased.
THE GA POSTS FROM THIS NATION ARE IN-CHARACTER AND SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN AS MODERATOR RULINGS.

User avatar
Normlpeople
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1597
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Normlpeople » Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:16 am

OOC: You do realize no WA military and no WA peacekeeping force is a site rule, and in the unlikely event of a repeal of #2, would still be. We just wouldn't have #2 to point at.
Words and Opinion of Clover the Clever
Ambassador to the WA for the Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople

User avatar
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
Diplomat
 
Posts: 607
Founded: Mar 05, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper » Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:22 am

Normlpeople wrote:OOC: You do realize no WA military and no WA peacekeeping force is a site rule, and in the unlikely event of a repeal of #2, would still be. We just wouldn't have #2 to point at.

OOC: The ruleset is currently under revision, and there is a fair chance that the "no WA army" rule is going away.
The General Assembly Delegation of the Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper:
-- Wad Ari Alaz, Wrapperian Ambassador to the WA; Author, SCR#200, GAR #300, GAR#361.
-- Wad Ahume Orliss-Dorcke, Deputy Ambassador; two-time Intergalactic Karaoke League champion.
-- Wad Dawei DeGoah, Ambassador Emeritus; deceased.
THE GA POSTS FROM THIS NATION ARE IN-CHARACTER AND SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN AS MODERATOR RULINGS.

User avatar
Normlpeople
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1597
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Normlpeople » Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:25 am

The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:
Normlpeople wrote:OOC: You do realize no WA military and no WA peacekeeping force is a site rule, and in the unlikely event of a repeal of #2, would still be. We just wouldn't have #2 to point at.

OOC: The ruleset is currently under revision, and there is a fair chance that the "no WA army" rule is going away.


OOC: Until it does, the discussion is moot.
Words and Opinion of Clover the Clever
Ambassador to the WA for the Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:25 am

The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:
Normlpeople wrote:OOC: You do realize no WA military and no WA peacekeeping force is a site rule, and in the unlikely event of a repeal of #2, would still be. We just wouldn't have #2 to point at.

OOC: The ruleset is currently under revision, and there is a fair chance that the "no WA army" rule is going away.

OOC: are you saying that as somebody with an in to the modcave? Or as personal speculation?

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
Diplomat
 
Posts: 607
Founded: Mar 05, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper » Thu Mar 24, 2016 6:00 am

Normlpeople wrote:
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:OOC: The ruleset is currently under revision, and there is a fair chance that the "no WA army" rule is going away.


OOC: Until it does, the discussion is moot.

OOC: I don't think this discussion is moot. There are several attempts to repeal GAR#2 right now. IC, my nation will consistently support the idea that the WA remains unarmed, and that's the primary reason why it's been against every repeal attempt. If we have this discussion now, and have a draft ready by the time a repeal of GAR#2 goes to vote, my nation can, in good conscience, support a repeal of GAR#2, with the understanding that this will follow.

Separatist Peoples wrote:
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:OOC: The ruleset is currently under revision, and there is a fair chance that the "no WA army" rule is going away.

OOC: are you saying that as somebody with an in to the modcave? Or as personal speculation?

Anything on this nation, is player's opinion/speculation. It's very common knowledge that the ruleset is under revision, and if you look at the draft rules some have suggested, the "no WA army" rule is gone in a couple of them, though it remains in IA's proposed draft. So, as any player would, I'd say it's not a "good chance" nor a "slim chance", but a "fair chance" that rule will go. But no, for the record, I have no inside information on what the final set of rules will look like. It looks like we're still taking input from players on what they think they should look like.
The General Assembly Delegation of the Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper:
-- Wad Ari Alaz, Wrapperian Ambassador to the WA; Author, SCR#200, GAR #300, GAR#361.
-- Wad Ahume Orliss-Dorcke, Deputy Ambassador; two-time Intergalactic Karaoke League champion.
-- Wad Dawei DeGoah, Ambassador Emeritus; deceased.
THE GA POSTS FROM THIS NATION ARE IN-CHARACTER AND SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN AS MODERATOR RULINGS.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Thu Mar 24, 2016 6:09 am

The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:OOC: are you saying that as somebody with an in to the modcave? Or as personal speculation?

Anything on this nation, is player's opinion/speculation. It's very common knowledge that the ruleset is under revision, and if you look at the draft rules some have suggested, the "no WA army" rule is gone in a couple of them, though it remains in IA's proposed draft. So, as any player would, I'd say it's not a "good chance" nor a "slim chance", but a "fair chance" that rule will go. But no, for the record, I have no inside information on what the final set of rules will look like. It looks like we're still taking input from players on what they think they should look like.

OOC: good. That would be a bloody terrible idea. The looming IC threat of "obey or be invaded" would suck.

IC: "We are opposed to the WA having any military force even indirectly at it's command, for any reason. If the next door neighbor's genocide is keeping you up at night, you deal with it. The WA should remain a purely legislative body."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8067
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Excidium Planetis » Thu Mar 24, 2016 9:13 am

The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:(Ari throws his hands up in disgust, but Ahume raises an eyebrow, and whispers in Ari's ear. Ari snorts, but then looks back at Ahume, who nods his head.)

ARI: Hmm. Okay. Add a clause that says no WA personnel can carry any weapons, and we'll consider it.


"How do you expect them to defend themselves? The so-called 'Weapons Nullifiers' only work at the WAHQ. If WA personnel are deployed to a Member nation, what will happen if they are attacked?"
Current Ambassador: Adelia Meritt
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 9 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8067
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Excidium Planetis » Thu Mar 24, 2016 9:28 am

Second draft, feedback requested.
Current Ambassador: Adelia Meritt
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 9 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads