The whole "treat others how you'd like to be treated" thing, yeah. It's good that we've finally gotten moving on that.
Advertisement

by Wisconsin9 » Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:33 pm

by Vassenor » Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:36 pm

by Heidenheim » Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:45 pm
The Alexanderians wrote:Risingsuns wrote:Yes, we do. If we don't require these people to get therapy, America will deteriorate more than it already has.
No what we need is a lesbian in the White House, it's the best way to have a woman President and still have a First Lady. We get a woman and an LGBT in the White House and we still get first Lady Dresses! Sounds like a perfect scenario to me.


by Val Halla » Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:49 pm
Heidenheim wrote:The Alexanderians wrote:No what we need is a lesbian in the White House, it's the best way to have a woman President and still have a First Lady. We get a woman and an LGBT in the White House and we still get first Lady Dresses! Sounds like a perfect scenario to me.
I don't often jump into the fray when the conversation turns American-centric, but I have to put in my two cents (or whatever unit) worth here and say, having a lesbian in the White House is not only a good thing, it's ideal; we get a president who is female and LGBT. A double blow to the status quo, eh?
by New Decius » Tue Jan 05, 2016 1:06 pm

by Heidenheim » Tue Jan 05, 2016 1:13 pm
Val Halla wrote:Heidenheim wrote:
I don't often jump into the fray when the conversation turns American-centric, but I have to put in my two cents (or whatever unit) worth here and say, having a lesbian in the White House is not only a good thing, it's ideal; we get a president who is female and LGBT. A double blow to the status quo, eh?
Have her also be Asian, transgender and a cool person

by The Flutterlands » Tue Jan 05, 2016 1:16 pm

by TheDrunkenLlamas » Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:01 pm
Murovanka wrote:What's so difficult? Males have penises, females have vaginas. One is meant to fit into the other, that is natural. The other combinations are not.

by The Serbian Empire » Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:34 pm
Val Halla wrote:Heidenheim wrote:
I don't often jump into the fray when the conversation turns American-centric, but I have to put in my two cents (or whatever unit) worth here and say, having a lesbian in the White House is not only a good thing, it's ideal; we get a president who is female and LGBT. A double blow to the status quo, eh?
Have her also be Asian, transgender and a cool person

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:33 pm
Heidenheim wrote:The Alexanderians wrote:No what we need is a lesbian in the White House, it's the best way to have a woman President and still have a First Lady. We get a woman and an LGBT in the White House and we still get first Lady Dresses! Sounds like a perfect scenario to me.
I don't often jump into the fray when the conversation turns American-centric, but I have to put in my two cents (or whatever unit) worth here and say, having a lesbian in the White House is not only a good thing, it's ideal; we get a president who is female and LGBT. A double blow to the status quo, eh?

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:35 pm

by The Flutterlands » Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:46 pm
San Lumen wrote:I find it very upsetting that many states in the US don't have protections for LGBT people. In 29 states you can fired for being gay, denied service at a restaurant other business, evicted from your apartment. I don't see why anyone would be against a law prohibiting that.

by The Serbian Empire » Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:59 pm
San Lumen wrote:I find it very upsetting that many states in the US don't have protections for LGBT people. In 29 states you can fired for being gay, denied service at a restaurant other business, evicted from your apartment. I don't see why anyone would be against a law prohibiting that.

by Geilinor » Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:00 pm
The Serbian Empire wrote:San Lumen wrote:I find it very upsetting that many states in the US don't have protections for LGBT people. In 29 states you can fired for being gay, denied service at a restaurant other business, evicted from your apartment. I don't see why anyone would be against a law prohibiting that.
The Bible still is law in 29 states apparently.

by Usaimar » Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:02 pm

by The Serbian Empire » Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:04 pm

by Neu California » Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:28 pm

by Val Halla » Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:28 pm
GOPrepublic wrote:It's disgusting what are world is viewing as "normal"

by The Serbian Empire » Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:40 pm

by Vassenor » Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:41 pm
GOPrepublic wrote:It's disgusting what are world is viewing as "normal"
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Almonaster Nuevo, Ernest Drake, Frismana, Gotland and Oland, Greater Guantanamo, Grinning Dragon, Kewelsburg, Monsone, NewAlbion, Nilokeras, Outer Armatonisdaristan, The Chill Union, The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp, Valrifell, Valyxias, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army, Zantalio
Advertisement