Advertisement

by Michillies » Thu Dec 24, 2015 9:09 pm
Sereníssima Reppública Hesperiana
Accept no substitutes!

by Welskerland » Fri Dec 25, 2015 7:30 pm

by United Provinces of Atlantica » Fri Dec 25, 2015 9:46 pm

by Welskerland » Sat Dec 26, 2015 8:40 am
United Provinces of Atlantica wrote:Welskerland isn't in Esquarium. You'll need to move your nation to Esquarium first before you can apply to join the EC.

by Michillies » Sun Dec 27, 2015 12:02 am
Sereníssima Reppública Hesperiana
Accept no substitutes!

by The Republic of Lanos » Sun Dec 27, 2015 12:41 am

by Ainin » Sun Dec 27, 2015 1:03 am
OFFICE OF THE CITIZEN-PROCURATOR OF THE AININIAN REPUBLIC
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEIN THE ESQUARIAN COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE ESQUARIAN COMMUNITY
IN CHRISTIANA DI CAMPOSTELLA, UNITED REPUBLICS
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUCTIONThe Republic of Ainin,
Plaintiffs
The Esquarian Football Association,
Associate PlaintiffsThe Republic of Lanos,
DefendantsversusPursuant to the appropriate rules and procedures of the Esquarian Court of Justice and the judicial codes of the Esquarian Community law, the Citizen-Procurator of the Aininian Republic in his capacity as legal representative extraordinary and plenipotentiary of the Plaintiffs Republic of Ainin, files the following motion for a preliminary injunction against Defendants Republic of Lanos:
- Suspend the indictment of Misters Wen Xi and Jackson Xi by the Republic of Lanos District Court for the State of Keinsteinem pending a judicial review of the legality of the actions by the Esquarian Court of Justice or the Esquarian Court of Human Rights (as appropriate);
- Issue an indefinite stay of proceedings in the Republic of Lanos District Court for the State of Keinsteinem and any courts of assize or cassation in the Lanosian judiciary in regards to the prosecution of Misters Wen Xi and Jackson Xi;
- Order Defendants Republic of Lanos to acknowledge the diplomatic immunity of senior agents and officials of the associate plaintiffs Esquarian Football Association pending the outcome of judicial review by the Esquarian Court of Justice or the Esquarian Court of Human Rights (as appropriate);
- Grant leave for plaintiffs Republic of Ainin and associate plaintiffs Esquarian Football Association to file for judicial review at the Esquarian Court of Justice or the Esquarian Court of Human Rights (as appropriate).
The grounds for this motion are as follows:
- Plaintiffs Republic of Ainin believe that there is a strong case for judicial review due to the officials indicted possessing diplomatic immunity as part of their official duties as agents of the Esquarian Football Association, making their prosecution and extradition potentially unlawful under the terms of customary international on consular and diplomatic relations and require leave to seek judicial action to remedy this legal wrong;
- In the event that this motion is not granted by the court, the officials in question would be extradited to the Republic of Lanos, where they would potentially be subject to degrading treatment in violation of their status as accredited diplomatic officials, and charged with capital offences resulting in execution, which would result in a situation in grave violation of their fundamental civil and humanitarian rights that cannot be remedied;
- As the motion sought by Plaintiffs Republic of Ainin only seeks a temporary stay to appeal the validity of the Lanosian indictment's validity in regards to Esquarian international law, no harm is done to the integrity of the proceedings if the motion is granted and they would be allowed to continue if the judicial review is ruled baseless, while a rejection of the motion would lead to direct, physical harm to the individuals in question, making it clear that the balance of harm overwhelmingly favours Plaintiffs;
- It is in the public interest for the Court to grant this motion as it would protect the fundamental human rights to life, liberty and security against a potentially unlawful incursion by Defendants Republic of Lanos.
Respectively submitted,
Victor Flandin
Minister of Justice of the Republic of Ainin
Citizen-Procurator of the Republic of Ainin
on behalf of the Cabinet and Republic of Ainin

by Gibberan » Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:14 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Walminghaven, elective monarchy?
Kassaran wrote:NSG, the one place where your opinion is the wrong one if it aint liberal enough for them... unless you're me, I'm well known for generally just despising human rights and the whole idea of entitlement.
Timothia wrote:My bad, I should have known better than to challenge the unchanging hive-mind of NSG. Won't happen again any time soon.

by Francilie » Sun Dec 27, 2015 1:26 pm

by Britanno 2 » Sun Dec 27, 2015 4:10 pm


by Montecara » Tue Dec 29, 2015 5:05 pm

by Tuthina » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:10 pm
14:54:02 <Lykens> Explain your definition of Reno.
11:47 <Swilatia> Good god, copy+paste is no way to build a country!
03:08 <Democratic Koyro> NSG senate is a glaring example of why no one in NSG should ever have a position of authority

by United Provinces of Atlantica » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:41 pm
Tuthina wrote:Freyhill is a previously-undeclared member of EU, which I think you lot should consider.

by FreYhill » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:02 am
Tuthina wrote:Freyhill is a previously-undeclared member of EU, which I think you lot should consider.
United Provinces of Atlantica wrote:The Atlantican government changes its vote from Aye to Conditional Aye upon leaving the Esquarian Union.

by United Provinces of Atlantica » Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:03 am

by Masseau » Thu Dec 31, 2015 9:11 am

by Britanno 2 » Thu Dec 31, 2015 9:40 am
Montecara wrote:Freyhill: AYE
Montezelo: AYE
Walminghaven: NO
Explanation of vote: The Government of Montecara has no objection to the admission of the states of Freyhill and Montezelo to the Esquarian Community. It must, however, oppose the admission of the state of Walminghaven, which retains provision in its national law for the use of the death penalty. It is the firm and consistent policy of the Government of Montecara that the death penalty is a cruel, inhumane, and unjustifiable punishment, and it calls upon all states to renounce its use. The Government of Montecara would reconsider the application of the state of Walminghaven if its government were to act to remove from its laws provision for use of the death penalty in all cases.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement