Advertisement
by Vancouvia » Mon Dec 14, 2015 4:11 pm
by Hodgsonistan » Mon Dec 14, 2015 5:11 pm
Governmental Discussion (2015)
An act to ensure the transparent and fair operation of legislative and judicial proceedings
The Senate
(1) All posts made in the Senate of The Western Isles by a member nation of the region must not be deleted
(2) Posts made in the Senate by a member nation of the region must not be altered in a way that significantly changes their intended meaning unless no other post has been made since
(3) All proceedings of the Senate must be made as visible as possible to all members of the region
The Supreme Court
(1) All posts made in the Supreme Court of The Western Isles by a member nation of the region must not be deleted, with the exception of posts that are made in violation of the court's policy of speech, which may be suppressed by the Justices."
(2) Posts made in the Supreme Court by a member nation of the region must not be altered in a way that significantly changes their intended meaning unless no other post has been made since
(3) All proceedings of the Supreme Court must be made as visible as possible to all members of the region
Enforcement and Punishment
(1)The responsibility to enforce this act lies in all members of the region. Any member of the region noticing a violation of this act must report it.
(2) A violation of this act that is not immediately corrected by the perpetrator shall be prosecuted by the government with the felony of "Deceiving the Public," as outlined under the 2015 Criminal Code.
by Hodgsonistan » Mon Dec 14, 2015 5:29 pm
by Vancouvia » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:35 pm
by Dashgrinaar » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:40 pm
by Vancouvia » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:44 pm
Dashgrinaar wrote:Seconded. Are we disregarding Lithuania as a Senator? If we are, the motion passes. If we are not, we need one more second.
by Dashgrinaar » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:51 pm
by Vancouvia » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:53 pm
by Dashgrinaar » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:57 pm
by Vancouvia » Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:01 pm
Dashgrinaar wrote:Technically, according to Presidential Order 4, we are granted communication powers, as we are officers.
I will wait for Verdon to post, but this seems unnecessary.
by Dashgrinaar » Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:04 pm
by Vancouvia » Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:06 pm
Dashgrinaar wrote:Ok, but just saying, the Senators would more likely communicate more with the region than Justices, though I do see your point.
by Dashgrinaar » Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:08 pm
by Libra Project » Tue Dec 15, 2015 2:00 am
by The Pacific Peace Union » Tue Dec 15, 2015 5:53 am
by Wildelyn » Tue Dec 15, 2015 7:01 am
by Dashgrinaar » Tue Dec 15, 2015 7:36 am
by Dashgrinaar » Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:31 am
Verdon wrote:Vote FOR Hodgsonistan's bill.
You guys are gonna have to help me out a bit, I'm getting caught up in which legislation we're currently discussing.
by Verdon » Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:37 am
by Wildelyn » Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:42 am
Verdon wrote:On Wildelyn's bill:
Firstly, I think this would be a law, rather than an amendment, as it outlines specific limitations of the officer positions, rather than altering their actual purposes. More like a federal regulations code. I think the language "shall and be the only one to have" is redundant and confusing, as none of the other positions are granted the power.
President: I'm almost wary of giving the President executive power, as it makes the "executive order" thing that much more dangerous. To be honest, I've always thought that those were complete bullsh*t.
VP: would be fine with granting border control to VP, not sure they need polls but that's not really that important.
SoI: Doesn't need those powers. That's not what their job is about.
SoE: same thing.
Definitely in favor of giving Sec. of Info polling powers. I think that the region would benefit if they could gather information in that method.
All in all, I'm not a big fan of this one. There are some changes in here that I like, but considering the main purpose here is to extend the Border Control feature to all positions, I don't really see the necessity - especially considering so many people have the comms function.
by Verdon » Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:08 am
Wildelyn wrote:Secretary of Interior job is to manage the Interior affairs of the Region, same goes with Exterior but with Exterior affairs of the Region - I completely agree that it might be 'dangeorus' but the President is the President and so he should be able to have Executive presiding over the Region, following the constitituion of course.
To add furthermore on the Border Control for SoE and SoI, its very vital, at least in my opinion as there is lots of times were we don't have Miklania on or Vancouvia and then certain trolls run around - the SoE; the guy who gets people in the Region should also be able to get these people out incase they are Raiders, Trolls and so on.. the SoI, same.. he Manages the Interior affairs of our region and should be able to also have border control powers as per his duties.
I am extremely delighted to see that you are interested in this though if you'd like to change anything, I can agree on polls for VP and maybe Border Control for SoE but my reason for adding and extending border control is in case of security.
Thanks.
by Wildelyn » Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:20 am
Verdon wrote:Wildelyn wrote:Secretary of Interior job is to manage the Interior affairs of the Region, same goes with Exterior but with Exterior affairs of the Region - I completely agree that it might be 'dangeorus' but the President is the President and so he should be able to have Executive presiding over the Region, following the constitituion of course.
To add furthermore on the Border Control for SoE and SoI, its very vital, at least in my opinion as there is lots of times were we don't have Miklania on or Vancouvia and then certain trolls run around - the SoE; the guy who gets people in the Region should also be able to get these people out incase they are Raiders, Trolls and so on.. the SoI, same.. he Manages the Interior affairs of our region and should be able to also have border control powers as per his duties.
I am extremely delighted to see that you are interested in this though if you'd like to change anything, I can agree on polls for VP and maybe Border Control for SoE but my reason for adding and extending border control is in case of security.
Thanks.
I think you're using 'Exterior' and 'Interior' as absolute terms, when their definitions in the constitution outline it differently. Perhaps I could see the reason for granting the SoI border control as a REALLY loose extension of "ensuring that rules and standards are followed," but not SoE under its current constitutional definition (no hard feelings).
I understand the main point is to increase regional security, but having so many people with ejection powers also seems kind of dangerous. When EPA was ejected, there was split opinion on whether or not it was justified, which means there is a definite possibility of the same controversy arising again. Our regional government works best when it is cohesive, rather than fighting itself (hey, I can dream, right?).
I would support this with significant cuts and reclassification to law.
by Vancouvia » Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:32 am
by Wildelyn » Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:46 am
Vancouvia wrote:I can't give the President "Executive Power". Only the WA delegate or Founder can have that be default.
On giving the VP border control: that goes against Article VI section 1. I have given the Chief Justice that control before and would be happy to return it
Communications: no one really needs this power at all except the President to conduct elections. Any sort of regional telegram that people want to send out can just be sent out through the President. He's supposed to check it over first anyway to limit the spammyness that could result in everyone sending out their own telegrams.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement