NATION

PASSWORD

Should we ban the impovershed from having children?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Should we ban the impovershed from having children?

Yes
52
14%
No
304
80%
Certain groups, but not all of the very poor
22
6%
 
Total votes : 378

User avatar
Padanyia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 116
Founded: Sep 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Should we ban the impovershed from having children?

Postby Padanyia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:10 pm

I'm asking if we should require licenses to have children, with those who can't afford children without government assistance not allowed to. If you had children illegally, you would either have some kind of penalty if you could manage or your child would be given to a relative or the state. I can see many advantages to doing this.

- Much fewer welfare payments

- Much less crime

- Much better educational outcomes/less behavioral disturbances in school

- Better for the economy/higher gdp per capita due to less welfare and other economic advantages

- More globally competitive

- Likely a genetic eugenic effect; with a smarter population and all that entails

I don't refer to forced sterilization, or to deliberately targeting any certain ethnic group. I think we should have a parental licensing program like you need to drive a car, and you would have to pass a test and meet a certain income threshold to prove you can take care of a child without government and ideally even charitable assistance. I think that the first nation to implement a program like this or some other eugenic program will quickly become the best/most competitive in the world. For those who would tell me there's a chance I'll be not allowed to have children/sterilized, I can honestly tell you I would be willing to be sterilized to further the cause of eugenics if I could eventually adopt children.

User avatar
Palakistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1306
Founded: May 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Palakistan » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:11 pm

No. That is a slippery slope.
Last edited by Palakistan on Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My stats are frozen at 10%
I annoy lots of people with my views. Sorry abou' that.

Your worst In Character enemy should be your best Out Of Character friend.
- to you who said that: genius!

User avatar
Vajorr
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 149
Founded: May 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Vajorr » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:11 pm

No
The Federal Republic of Vajorr — Bundesrepublik Rheutshland
One of Esquarium's liberal states trying to make himself known.

User avatar
Padanyia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 116
Founded: Sep 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Padanyia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:12 pm

Palakistan wrote:No. That is a slippery slope.

Specifically why?

User avatar
The Hobbesian Metaphysician
Minister
 
Posts: 3311
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:12 pm

Eugenics?

Why exactly?
I am just going to lay it out here, I am going to be very blunt.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 74649
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Galloism » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:13 pm

First, I don't know why you should have a say on what people do with their bodies.

Second, how the hell are you going to enforce it?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alyakia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:13 pm

-less people to do shit jobs
-even lower birth rates
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Padanyia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 116
Founded: Sep 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Padanyia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:13 pm

The Hobbesian Metaphysician wrote:Eugenics?

Why exactly?

Not exactly eugenics, just banning the very poor from having children. The benefits would be the ones I listed, and likely many others.

User avatar
Padanyia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 116
Founded: Sep 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Padanyia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:14 pm

Galloism wrote:First, I don't know why you should have a say on what people do with their bodies.

Second, how the hell are you going to enforce it?


A. Some bureaucratic office like the DMV

B. Illegal children given to relatives who could manage, and if they deny them, the state adoption program

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69263
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:14 pm

Gingers! Ban gingers from having children!
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Redsection
Minister
 
Posts: 2116
Founded: Jan 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Redsection » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:15 pm

No we need everyone for the workforce.
[*]National Syndicalist
[*]Soon to join the American Blackshirt Party
[*]Majority European, Native American ancestry, latino heritage
[*]Anti: Globalism , Communism , Nazism, Satanism
[*]Pro: Fascism, Guns Rights, Militias

User avatar
Padanyia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 116
Founded: Sep 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Padanyia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:15 pm

Alyakia wrote:-less people to do shit jobs
-even lower birth rates

1. Robots will do all shit jobs very soon

2. We could give a subsidy for the middle class/rich to have children, but a declining population won't be a bad thing when most labor is automated. This is what Japan is speculated to be planning on with their population decline and they've invested quite a bit in robotics.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 74649
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Galloism » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:16 pm

Padanyia wrote:
Galloism wrote:First, I don't know why you should have a say on what people do with their bodies.

Second, how the hell are you going to enforce it?


A. Some bureaucratic office like the DMV

B. Illegal children given to relatives who could manage, and if they deny them, the state adoption program

You didn't say why you should have a say on what people do with their bodies.


You do know that the adoption system is already amazingly and impressively overburdened,right? I thought you wanted to save money - now instead of giving partial support, the government pays for them 100%.

Great plan there lou.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177082
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:16 pm

Padanyia wrote: Likely a genetic eugenic effect; with a smarter population and all that entails

Hahaha, no.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alyakia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:16 pm

Padanyia wrote:
Alyakia wrote:-less people to do shit jobs
-even lower birth rates

1. Robots will do all shit jobs very soon

2. We could give a subsidy for the middle class/rich to have children, but a declining population won't be a bad thing when most labor is automated. This is what Japan is speculated to be planning on with their population decline and they've invested quite a bit in robotics.


but subsidies are fundamentally government assistance, and the entire point of your plan was to stop that
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Kraylandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5238
Founded: Sep 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kraylandia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:17 pm

Should we ban people that suggest stupid ideas from having kids?


The Black Forrest wrote:Gingers! Ban gingers from having children!


That's a fantastic idea.
You can call me Luci
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent..
Jello is my bored buddy!
Lito's NS wife

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177082
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:17 pm

Alyakia wrote:-less people to do shit jobs
-even lower birth rates

-literally letting Hitler win
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:17 pm

Back to the mandatory sterilization era.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58085
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:17 pm

No, we should ban bad ideas like this from being implemented as the rich have the lowest birth rates of all.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Godular
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 15254
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:17 pm

Not just no, hell no, wtf is wrong with you no, and a few other heavily-embellished negative responses.
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Polar Svalbard
Senator
 
Posts: 3642
Founded: Mar 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Polar Svalbard » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:18 pm

No put we need to change Welfare into workfare, hey we'll give you money but you gotta go pick grapes and stuff like that, unless you absouletly cannot work
Member of The Western Isles
Svalbardian international policy summarized: "Shoot first, hope that no one asks questions later." - Linaviar

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 74649
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Galloism » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:18 pm

Padanyia wrote:
Alyakia wrote:-less people to do shit jobs
-even lower birth rates

1. Robots will do all shit jobs very soon

2. We could give a subsidy for the middle class/rich to have children, but a declining population won't be a bad thing when most labor is automated. This is what Japan is speculated to be planning on with their population decline and they've invested quite a bit in robotics.

Ok, and this is a wild idea - rather than implementing a costly eugenics program and start subsiding children for the well off, why don't we just improve our education system so we can end the cycle of poverty passing from parents to children for half the cost?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Padanyia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 116
Founded: Sep 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Padanyia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:18 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Padanyia wrote:1. Robots will do all shit jobs very soon

2. We could give a subsidy for the middle class/rich to have children, but a declining population won't be a bad thing when most labor is automated. This is what Japan is speculated to be planning on with their population decline and they've invested quite a bit in robotics.


but subsidies are fundamentally government assistance, and the entire point of your plan was to stop that

But this would reverse the dysgenic effect we may be seeing now or soon.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177082
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:19 pm

Galloism wrote:
Padanyia wrote:1. Robots will do all shit jobs very soon

2. We could give a subsidy for the middle class/rich to have children, but a declining population won't be a bad thing when most labor is automated. This is what Japan is speculated to be planning on with their population decline and they've invested quite a bit in robotics.

Ok, and this is a wild idea - rather than implementing a costly eugenics program and start subsiding children for the well off, why don't we just improve our education system so we can end the cycle of poverty passing from parents to children for half the cost?

But then the poors will spread their poor genes and pollute our glorious middle-or-higher-class master race.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Padanyia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 116
Founded: Sep 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Padanyia » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:19 pm

greed and death wrote:Back to the mandatory sterilization era.

That's not the plan I referred to. Mandatory licensing and your children given to relatives if you have them illegally.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chess Socialism, Falkland Islands and British Antarctica, Fjolmidlum, Grinning Dragon, Herargon, Maraganta, Tillania, Valrifell, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads