Advertisement
by The Kievan People » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:32 pm
by Neo Philippine Empire » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:32 pm
by Palakistan » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:52 pm
The Kievan People wrote:Moving an entire Stryker Brigade, including a three day supply package, would require over 700 C-130 sorties at max load (which is unrealistic).
For sealift you'd need 2-3 ships comparable to the Bob Hope class. Taking into account loading, transit and unloading trip time would be about a week. Though this assumes there are ports capable of handling this class of ship.
Your worst In Character enemy should be your best Out Of Character friend.- to you who said that: genius!
by Palakistan » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:54 pm
Neo Philippine Empire wrote:Another stupid question.
I have around 20 Ticonderoga Cruisers in my whole fleet, are they useful or should I sell them to build more Destroyers?
Your worst In Character enemy should be your best Out Of Character friend.- to you who said that: genius!
by Padnak » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:17 pm
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.
Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.
Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.
Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.
The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.
Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.
by The Akasha Colony » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:18 pm
Neo Philippine Empire wrote:Another stupid question.
I have around 20 Ticonderoga Cruisers in my whole fleet, are they useful or should I sell them to build more Destroyers?
by New Vihenia » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:30 pm
by The Greater Aryan Race » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:33 pm
Palakistan wrote:How do you guys make your ORBAT's and chart structures for your military organization?
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.
by Gallia- » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:36 pm
New Vihenia wrote:120mm nuclear mortar shell anyone :3 ?
by Padnak » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:38 pm
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.
Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.
Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.
Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.
The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.
Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.
by Lamoni » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:02 pm
New Vihenia wrote:120mm nuclear mortar shell anyone :3 ?
Licana on the M-21A2 MBT: "Well, it is one of the most badass tanks on NS."
Vortiaganica: Lamoni I understand fully, of course. The two (Lamoni & Lyras) are more inseparable than the Clinton family and politics.
Triplebaconation: Lamoni commands a quiet respect that carries its own authority. He is the Mandela of NS.
by Korva » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:08 pm
by Gallia- » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:17 pm
by Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:21 pm
by Korva » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:27 pm
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:
Ist brilliant bruder. Zie anschluss intensifies
Would it be possible to mount a recoilless rifle on a plane, to make it like the Hs. 129 or B-25 which both had 75mm guns? Make it recoilless and direct the gasses down?
by Imperializt Russia » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:28 pm
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:
Ist brilliant bruder. Zie anschluss intensifies
Would it be possible to mount a recoilless rifle on a plane, to make it like the Hs. 129 or B-25 which both had 75mm guns? Make it recoilless and direct the gasses down?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:32 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:Ist brilliant bruder. Zie anschluss intensifies
Would it be possible to mount a recoilless rifle on a plane, to make it like the Hs. 129 or B-25 which both had 75mm guns? Make it recoilless and direct the gasses down?
Well yes, but remember that the need to mount AT guns on planes sort of died as bomb-aiming techniques, rocket loads and eventually guided missiles came in.
by Western Pacific Territories » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:32 pm
by Imperializt Russia » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:33 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:38 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:It would be more effective to mount such a gun Spooky-style?
Define "effective". The gun would be manned and have a greater stowage, though engagement options would be limited. You wouldn't be able to pop over low cover and send a few rounds into something (if you had the time) or spurt rockets, instead you have to fly high and slow.
by Connori Pilgrims » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:46 pm
by Western Pacific Territories » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:49 pm
by The Kievan People » Sat Sep 26, 2015 7:53 pm
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:Without an enemy with effective air support/defense, the AC-130 has a very long staying time and can provide close air support for hours - an A-10 or F-35 could only engage ten or twelve targets, or as many as it has missiles/rockets, but the AC-130 has hundreds of rounds. Would a forward-facing gun on a large attack plane have the same advantages?
by Tule » Sat Sep 26, 2015 7:54 pm
New Vihenia wrote:120mm nuclear mortar shell anyone :3 ?
by Esgonia » Sat Sep 26, 2015 7:57 pm
Western Pacific Territories wrote:Trains. This gonna be gud. Anyways, I am a temperate, heavily forested island nation if you didn't know. I have a heavy reliance on railways, and use trains to transfer ammunition, and in the threat of a invasion, troops. I have about 4,000,000km squared in land size, so trains, how effective?
18 years old, Male, Filipino, Centrist-Right(ish). Call me Es, Esgo/n, Ainsley Harriot, whatever. Pro: Memes Anti: Not memes, Minecraft youtubers, any ideology that is represented by this color. |
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Eudaimonia Agape, Tamocordia
Advertisement