by Leukenstein » Tue Aug 25, 2015 7:28 pm
by Valrifell » Tue Aug 25, 2015 7:40 pm
by King Nephmir II » Tue Aug 25, 2015 7:48 pm
by Zaolat » Tue Aug 25, 2015 7:52 pm
by Luxdonia » Tue Aug 25, 2015 7:52 pm
by Benevolent Thomas » Tue Aug 25, 2015 7:56 pm
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Zaolat » Tue Aug 25, 2015 10:13 pm
by Luxdonia » Tue Aug 25, 2015 10:21 pm
by The Silver Sentinel » Tue Aug 25, 2015 11:38 pm
by Klaus Devestatorie » Wed Aug 26, 2015 12:38 am
by Tancerlo » Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:07 am
Valrifell wrote:LKE and BI are Independents, as Imperialism is a branch of Independentism.
by Drop Your Pants » Wed Aug 26, 2015 5:05 am
Leukenstein wrote:Hi,
Old gameplayer here who is looking to get back into military matters on Nationstates. Invader, defender, I don't have a preference right now.
by Trick Shot » Wed Aug 26, 2015 5:51 am
Marelius wrote:You got Festavo'd
Revall wrote:Festavo is an off his rocker cowboy capable of anything at the drop of a hat
Nuke wrote:But can you really be more dangerous than Festavo? Now that guy is a real fucking OG.
Valrifell wrote:God dammit Fest, you think too much!
by Vandoosa » Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:24 am
Trick Shot wrote:
Besides the other obvious errors, you forget to list the Osiran Sekhmet Legion. This is disappointing considering you listed every other GCR that has an active military.
by United RussoAsia » Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:27 am
by Onderkelkia » Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:50 am
Onderkelkia wrote:Cormac Stark wrote:They voluntarily imposed the Invader tag on their region. Let's not quibble.
The invader tag is on the LKE (as it is on several other prominent Imperialist regions) because the purpose of tags is to show new members the range of activities which are carried out frequently in our region. We conduct a substantial number of offensive operations, so new members looking to invade within a wider package are able to take the opportunity up as part of the LKE armed forces. We are also tagged "Industrial", "Past Tech" and "Steampunk" to reflect the different types of role-play which take place on our forums; no one would characterise the LKE as a "Past Tech" region in consequence of this.
We do not regard the invader tag as attaching the LKE's affiliation to the Raider sphere. If we did regard it as such, we would not use it, as anyone with the slightest knowledge of the LKE's position on this issue - a position which has been maintained consistently since our founding in 2005 - would appreciate.
The presence of this tag has never led anyone to suggest that the LKE is an invader region before. If it had, we would have removed it to avoid confusion.
by Misley » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:23 am
by Cora II » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:31 am
by Siberian Districts » Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:16 am
The Silver Sentinel wrote:Luxdonia wrote:I believe I am correct, Zaolat. Care to point out any errors in my list?
For one The South Pacific is not independent. They are flat our raiders at this point. You also forgot TITO, The Texas Defense Forces, The UDL, The RIA for defenders. I would figure with your intimate knowledge of gameplay you would not make such egregious errors, but alas I am once again disappointed.
by Xoriet » Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:24 am
Siberian Districts wrote:The Silver Sentinel wrote:
For one The South Pacific is not independent. They are flat our raiders at this point. You also forgot TITO, The Texas Defense Forces, The UDL, The RIA for defenders. I would figure with your intimate knowledge of gameplay you would not make such egregious errors, but alas I am once again disappointed.
Yeah, no. The SPSF is indeed independent. I'd appreciate it if you didn't make such comments without knowing about our workings.
by Trick Shot » Wed Aug 26, 2015 11:24 am
Xoriet wrote:Siberian Districts wrote:
Yeah, no. The SPSF is indeed independent. I'd appreciate it if you didn't make such comments without knowing about our workings.
He's probably referring to the fact that you guys seem to only ever raid. To be fair, people used to regularly call EPSA "defender" because we seemed to only ever defend. It's not an insult. It's just how you're perceived based on your activities.
Marelius wrote:You got Festavo'd
Revall wrote:Festavo is an off his rocker cowboy capable of anything at the drop of a hat
Nuke wrote:But can you really be more dangerous than Festavo? Now that guy is a real fucking OG.
Valrifell wrote:God dammit Fest, you think too much!
by Xoriet » Wed Aug 26, 2015 12:05 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:12 pm
Valrifell never actually wrote:The Black Hawks r best classy ebul raider org mwahaha *highfive*
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Onderkelkia » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:27 pm
Xoriet wrote:What you do with your independent military is what you are classified as in general terms.
It is simpler overall to operate under a definite alignment such as raider or defender, really. Otherwise what you really are is subject to perception and image.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arvadia
Advertisement