Advertisement

by Ndaku » Wed Aug 12, 2015 4:07 pm

by Anglo-Saxon North America » Thu Aug 13, 2015 3:01 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:Explain further
It's not complex. A monocultural society is not a desirable thing. Cultures that don't evolve and integrate stagnate and die.
And I'm typing this in English, the ultimate example of a hybrid language synthesised from others, born from millennia of cultural adaptation and assimilation.
If Anglo-european-origin culture exists at all, it's multicultural.

by Dortmundia » Thu Aug 13, 2015 3:31 pm
Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_enclaves_in_North_American_cities#Germany

by Byzantium Imperial » Thu Aug 13, 2015 3:38 pm
Dortmundia wrote:Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_enclaves_in_North_American_cities#Germany
funny enough, I live not far at all from one of those. Fredericksburg, Texas. They don't:
Take offense from non-Lutheran/Catholic churches in the town
Take offense to non-German foods
Take offense to non-German architecture
Identify as non-American.
This. Multiculturalism was ok throughout history and still is. As long foreign cultures do no threat to replace the dominant native culture and instead enriching it multiculturalism is fine. The only particular that is threatening is Islam. I know this will hurt the liberals but it is a fact tha muslims are more loyal to "their lands" instead of to the host country (just see the quote of Woolvich killer). Than the want that all people adjust to them so they choose to be offended if non-halal meat is served. If they do not like it than they should not use it.

by DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Aug 13, 2015 3:40 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

by Gauthier » Thu Aug 13, 2015 6:01 pm
Dortmundia wrote:This. Multiculturalism was ok throughout history and still is. As long foreign cultures do no threat to replace the dominant native culture and instead enriching it multiculturalism is fine. The only particular that is threatening is Islam. I know this will hurt the liberals but it is a fact tha muslims are more loyal to "their lands" instead of to the host country (just see the quote of Woolvich killer). Than the want that all people adjust to them so they choose to be offended if non-halal meat is served. If they do not like it than they should not use it.

by Dortmundia » Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:38 pm
Gauthier wrote:Dortmundia wrote:This. Multiculturalism was ok throughout history and still is. As long foreign cultures do no threat to replace the dominant native culture and instead enriching it multiculturalism is fine. The only particular that is threatening is Islam. I know this will hurt the liberals but it is a fact tha muslims are more loyal to "their lands" instead of to the host country (just see the quote of Woolvich killer). Than the want that all people adjust to them so they choose to be offended if non-halal meat is served. If they do not like it than they should not use it.
So Islam should be outlawed, mosques demolished and Muslims deported or forcibly converted then?

by MERIZoC » Thu Aug 13, 2015 8:50 pm
Dortmundia wrote:Gauthier wrote:
So Islam should be outlawed, mosques demolished and Muslims deported or forcibly converted then?
Not in such art. Just stop immigration from the Middle Eeast and deport radical fanatics back from where they are coming. Otherwise UK and France will like Saudi Arabia without gay marriages and all stuff the left hoped.

by Byzantium Imperial » Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:30 pm
Merizoc wrote:Dortmundia wrote:Not in such art. Just stop immigration from the Middle Eeast and deport radical fanatics back from where they are coming. Otherwise UK and France will like Saudi Arabia without gay marriages and all stuff the left hoped.
Are you aware what country has the largest Muslim population? Or, you know, the second, third, fourth, sixth, and seventh? Something tells me that you just don't like Arabs, eh?

by Haktiva » Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:46 pm

by Dortmundia » Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:52 pm
Merizoc wrote:Dortmundia wrote:Not in such art. Just stop immigration from the Middle Eeast and deport radical fanatics back from where they are coming. Otherwise UK and France will like Saudi Arabia without gay marriages and all stuff the left hoped.
Are you aware what country has the largest Muslim population? Or, you know, the second, third, fourth, sixth, and seventh? Something tells me that you just don't like Arabs, eh?

by Haktiva » Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:53 pm
Dortmundia wrote:Merizoc wrote:Are you aware what country has the largest Muslim population? Or, you know, the second, third, fourth, sixth, and seventh? Something tells me that you just don't like Arabs, eh?
France has a 10% islamic population with the tendency to grow. I like Arabs when they are not radical muslims.

by Anglo-Saxon North America » Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:24 pm
Gauthier wrote:Dortmundia wrote:This. Multiculturalism was ok throughout history and still is. As long foreign cultures do no threat to replace the dominant native culture and instead enriching it multiculturalism is fine. The only particular that is threatening is Islam. I know this will hurt the liberals but it is a fact tha muslims are more loyal to "their lands" instead of to the host country (just see the quote of Woolvich killer). Than the want that all people adjust to them so they choose to be offended if non-halal meat is served. If they do not like it than they should not use it.
So Islam should be outlawed, mosques demolished and Muslims deported or forcibly converted then?

by Haktiva » Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:37 pm

by UED » Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:09 pm

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Aug 14, 2015 3:34 am
Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
It's not complex. A monocultural society is not a desirable thing. Cultures that don't evolve and integrate stagnate and die.
And I'm typing this in English, the ultimate example of a hybrid language synthesised from others, born from millennia of cultural adaptation and assimilation.
If Anglo-european-origin culture exists at all, it's multicultural.
monoculturalism has the ability to evolve. You can take in bits and pieces of other, of varying similarity, into your own a monocultural melting-pot way. Even in the ridiculous assumption that a culture cannot evolve on its own you can keep a monocultural society with occasional influence outside.
To add, I think you lack understanding as to what brought the English language. The latinate vocabulary you have was brought under brutal Norman rule, and the English language itself just about wiped out all the Celtic languages of the British Isles. Old Britain is a perfect example of the harms of a multicultural society.

by Mir i Ljubav » Fri Aug 14, 2015 3:52 am

by Anglo-Saxon North America » Fri Aug 14, 2015 10:05 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:monoculturalism has the ability to evolve. You can take in bits and pieces of other, of varying similarity, into your own a monocultural melting-pot way. Even in the ridiculous assumption that a culture cannot evolve on its own you can keep a monocultural society with occasional influence outside.
To add, I think you lack understanding as to what brought the English language. The latinate vocabulary you have was brought under brutal Norman rule, and the English language itself just about wiped out all the Celtic languages of the British Isles. Old Britain is a perfect example of the harms of a multicultural society.
We don't live in 'Old Britain'. We live in a modern nation that exists within the same borders.
Of course, 'old Britain' was a multicultural society, anyway - long before 1066.
We have a long, proud history of assimilation.

by Anglo-Saxon North America » Fri Aug 14, 2015 10:07 pm
Mir i Ljubav wrote:I don't think the comment in the OP about Europe is true. My family were ethnic Russians who moved to Yugoslavia, and they had no trouble integrating, despite Yugoslav nationalism and the mutual dislike between it and the USSR. I think the problems faced by other cultures are often symptomatic of other, primarily economic, issues. The dominant culture will scapegoat minorities for their troubles because they don't know who else to blame, and as a result of the unfriendly climate, minorities will retreat into ghettos. Multiculturalism is a good thing in itself, and if people were more accepting and all cultures were preserved and celebrated - if the conditions would allow this - the problems which ostensibly arise from it wouldn't occur.

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:35 am
Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:It was multicultural. And those cultures eradicated each other basically.
Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:Scots and Irish are basically the last left from English eradication.
And the hell being "modern" has to do with it?
Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:People, societies don't change really.

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:37 am
Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:Mir i Ljubav wrote:I don't think the comment in the OP about Europe is true. My family were ethnic Russians who moved to Yugoslavia, and they had no trouble integrating, despite Yugoslav nationalism and the mutual dislike between it and the USSR. I think the problems faced by other cultures are often symptomatic of other, primarily economic, issues. The dominant culture will scapegoat minorities for their troubles because they don't know who else to blame, and as a result of the unfriendly climate, minorities will retreat into ghettos. Multiculturalism is a good thing in itself, and if people were more accepting and all cultures were preserved and celebrated - if the conditions would allow this - the problems which ostensibly arise from it wouldn't occur.
exactly. You integrated and it was fine. You didn't bring foreign culture with you.

by L Ron Cupboard » Sat Aug 15, 2015 4:12 am

by ErVaReAn rEpUbLiC » Sat Aug 15, 2015 4:12 am


by Mir i Ljubav » Sat Aug 15, 2015 6:49 am
Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:Mir i Ljubav wrote:I don't think the comment in the OP about Europe is true. My family were ethnic Russians who moved to Yugoslavia, and they had no trouble integrating, despite Yugoslav nationalism and the mutual dislike between it and the USSR. I think the problems faced by other cultures are often symptomatic of other, primarily economic, issues. The dominant culture will scapegoat minorities for their troubles because they don't know who else to blame, and as a result of the unfriendly climate, minorities will retreat into ghettos. Multiculturalism is a good thing in itself, and if people were more accepting and all cultures were preserved and celebrated - if the conditions would allow this - the problems which ostensibly arise from it wouldn't occur.
exactly. You integrated and it was fine. You didn't bring foreign culture with you.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A better dimension, J Andrew Murray, Lothria, MagestikTwelve, Orlavia, Plandistria, Rusozak, The Republic of the United Marble Tribes
Advertisement