Keyboard Warriors wrote:Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
Eh, that's not ostensibly true. If they supported an Amendment that accomplished this, they would in fact be supporting the Constitution. Specifically Article V.
With this concession, you've automatically invalidated every argument ever made which uses an imperative to uphold the constitution as a warrant, as the constitution can be amended in limitless ways.
Well yes it can, but thanks to the Amendment Process, that's a very tall order.
You can uphold the Constitution as a warrant on Existing Law. But proposing a theoretical out come is "unconstitutional" isn't ostensibly true.