NATION

PASSWORD

Affirmative Action: Righting Past Wrongs or Modern Racism?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you support affirmative action?

Yes, wholeheartedly!
15
12%
No, not at all!
64
52%
Somewhat, but I'd prefer it if only certain aspects were implemented, or if it were organized differently.
43
35%
 
Total votes : 122

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177147
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:06 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:I shouldn't have to pay the price for historical inequality and for wrongs that people in my past have committed.

When I apply for college admission or for a job or for scholarships, my ethnic background and the ethnic background of other applicants shouldn't be a factor.

And which of the following do you think would be a better means of achieving that end: doing absolutely nothing and hoping that the problem solves itself, or taking active steps to guarantee the equal treatment of all candidates for employment or school places or what have you?

FYI, if you choose the latter you support affirmative action.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
New Hampshire Republic
Diplomat
 
Posts: 639
Founded: Nov 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Hampshire Republic » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:08 pm

Its stupid to give someone a scholarship/job based on their race.

In a sense, it's racist.
The New Hampshire Republic (NHR)
New Hampshire Embassy Program
International Organization for Scouting|History of New Hampshire
Proud Member of theINTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION!
Current President: Dr. Jason Pasteur
House Majority: Liberty Party
Senate Majority: Republican Party
"You just hate smoking, so you use all your money and power to force others to think like you, that’s called fascism.” - South Park
"Capitalism: God's way of determining who is smart, and who is poor."- Ronald Ulysses Swanson
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."- Ben Franklin

User avatar
Crezilivion
Envoy
 
Posts: 294
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Crezilivion » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:15 pm

New Hampshire Republic wrote:Its stupid to give someone a scholarship/job based on their race.

In a sense, it's racist.


It's just as racist to discriminate against whites as it is blacks. To say otherwise would be just as racist. It is true that it is somewhat difficult to change your "class" but any race is able to do it if they want it badly enough. If they don't become more wealthy then it is someones own fault unless (sometimes) they have a disability. Even then there are many with disabilities who have been very intelligent and successful, Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein for example.
I'm a Capitalist, Conservative, "Libertarian", Spiritual, & INTJ
_[' ]_
(-_Q)

Pro: Capitalism, Pro-Life, God Emperor Trump, & Privately Owned Schools.

Like: Strictly English, Decriminalizing All Drugs, Legal Prostitution, Private Science Research, Nationalism, Prepared Military, 1st/4th Feminism, Heteronormativity, States' Rights, & Spirituality.

Neutral: Anything that doesn't hurt the U.S.

Dislike: Political Parties, 2nd/3rd Feminism, Heterophobia, Public Nudity, State Capitalism, P.C., Non-Spiritualism, & One-Sided Tolerance.

Anti: Communism, Socialism, Abortion On Demand, Anarchy, LGBT Culture, 99% of Gun Regulations, Illegal Aliens, "Man Made" Global Warming/Wage Gap/White or Male Privilege Myths & Taxes.

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:16 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:I shouldn't have to pay the price for historical inequality and for wrongs that people in my past have committed.

When I apply for college admission or for a job or for scholarships, my ethnic background and the ethnic background of other applicants shouldn't be a factor.

And which of the following do you think would be a better means of achieving that end: doing absolutely nothing and hoping that the problem solves itself, or taking active steps to guarantee the equal treatment of all candidates for employment or school places or what have you?

FYI, if you choose the latter you support affirmative action.


To be perfectly honest, I imagine affirmative action does far more to increase prejudice and discrimination than it does to diminish it.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63261
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:17 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Ifreann wrote:And which of the following do you think would be a better means of achieving that end: doing absolutely nothing and hoping that the problem solves itself, or taking active steps to guarantee the equal treatment of all candidates for employment or school places or what have you?

FYI, if you choose the latter you support affirmative action.


To be perfectly honest, I imagine affirmative action does far more to increase prejudice and discrimination than it does to diminish it.

And?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Jamzmania
Senator
 
Posts: 4863
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamzmania » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:18 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:I shouldn't have to pay the price for historical inequality and for wrongs that people in my past have committed.

When I apply for college admission or for a job or for scholarships, my ethnic background and the ethnic background of other applicants shouldn't be a factor.

And which of the following do you think would be a better means of achieving that end: doing absolutely nothing and hoping that the problem solves itself, or taking active steps to guarantee the equal treatment of all candidates for employment or school places or what have you?

FYI, if you choose the latter you support affirmative action.

Affirmative action seems to be the opposite of the latter.
The Alexanderians wrote:"Fear no man or woman,
No matter what their size.
Call upon me,
And I will equalize."

-Engraved on the side of my M1911 .45

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:29 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
To be perfectly honest, I imagine affirmative action does far more to increase prejudice and discrimination than it does to diminish it.

And?


You're always one for detail.

Logically, who do you think would resent affirmative action the most? White people, i.e: those who aren't advantaged by affirmative action.

Evidently, down the road, this resentment is going to be a problem. Not so much for middle-upper class whites who for the most part will either support AA or grudgingly tolerate it. No, the real problem's going to be lower-class whites. These are the people who are going to be the most affected by job losses, since they're the ones who are going to be teetering dangerously close to poverty. So when the white guy who really needs a job to support his family can't get a job, who do you think he's going to blame? The black guy who got the job at the nearby factory instead of him. He's going to be going home each day, always more depressed than the last, wondering why his life sucks. His scapegoat (because there's always a scapegoat) is going to be the black guy, and eventually black people in general. This guy's going to become a racist, and his kids probably will too, since he's now regularly complaining about black people at home. And that's what AA does and will continue to do, it makes racists out of non-racists, because it's a shitty little system that was implemented by people who have little to no idea as to how life actually works.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63261
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:31 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:And?


You're always one for detail.

Logically, who do you think would resent affirmative action the most? White people, i.e: those who aren't advantaged by affirmative action.

Evidently, down the road, this resentment is going to be a problem. Not so much for middle-upper class whites who for the most part will either support AA or grudgingly tolerate it. No, the real problem's going to be lower-class whites. These are the people who are going to be the most affected by job losses, since they're the ones who are going to be teetering dangerously close to poverty. So when the white guy who really needs a job to support his family can't get a job, who do you think he's going to blame? The black guy who got the job at the nearby factory instead of him. He's going to be going home each day, always more depressed than the last, wondering why his life sucks. His scapegoat (because there's always a scapegoat) is going to be the black guy, and eventually black people in general. This guy's going to become a racist, and his kids probably will too, since he's now regularly complaining about black people at home. And that's what AA does and will continue to do, it makes racists out of non-racists, because it's a shitty little system that was implemented by people who have little to no idea as to how life actually works.

You're assuming white people are stupid. You're assuming white people aren't advantaged by affirmative action. Neither of which are true.

Or do you have any actual research confirming this?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Catholic Federalized States
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 418
Founded: Feb 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Catholic Federalized States » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:33 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:I shouldn't have to pay the price for historical inequality and for wrongs that people in my past have committed.

When I apply for college admission or for a job or for scholarships, my ethnic background and the ethnic background of other applicants shouldn't be a factor.

or taking active steps to guarantee the equal treatment of all candidates for employment or school places or what have you?

FYI, if you choose the latter you support affirmative action.


Let's take "active steps" to guarantee equal treatment by giving the privileged heterosexual middle-aged white man the middle finger.

Equality doesn't work one way. There's absolutely no way affirmative action can be equal. The goal may be to establish equality in the end, but calling the action itself equal or standing for equality is stupid.

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:37 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
You're always one for detail.

Logically, who do you think would resent affirmative action the most? White people, i.e: those who aren't advantaged by affirmative action.

Evidently, down the road, this resentment is going to be a problem. Not so much for middle-upper class whites who for the most part will either support AA or grudgingly tolerate it. No, the real problem's going to be lower-class whites. These are the people who are going to be the most affected by job losses, since they're the ones who are going to be teetering dangerously close to poverty. So when the white guy who really needs a job to support his family can't get a job, who do you think he's going to blame? The black guy who got the job at the nearby factory instead of him. He's going to be going home each day, always more depressed than the last, wondering why his life sucks. His scapegoat (because there's always a scapegoat) is going to be the black guy, and eventually black people in general. This guy's going to become a racist, and his kids probably will too, since he's now regularly complaining about black people at home. And that's what AA does and will continue to do, it makes racists out of non-racists, because it's a shitty little system that was implemented by people who have little to no idea as to how life actually works.

You're assuming white people are stupid. You're assuming white people aren't advantaged by affirmative action. Neither of which are true.

Or do you have any actual research confirming this?


Yes, again with the research.

Naturally, it's part of the human condition (unless you're incredibly wise, which is something most people aren't, hence my point) to, when you're really down on your luck, blame other people for your problems. The person who got the job you needed instead of you because of the color of their skin or whether or not they have a vagina is the logical scapegoat. Evidently, less educated people (which like it or not, is the bulk of the lower class) are going to do less educated things, like becoming racists. It doesn't take a genius to realize this.

User avatar
Halnatorum
Attaché
 
Posts: 84
Founded: Jan 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Halnatorum » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:41 pm

The answer to discrimination in the past is to change who is discriminated against in the future.

That makes as much sense as chopping off one's hand because one gave you the one finger salute.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63261
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:43 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:You're assuming white people are stupid. You're assuming white people aren't advantaged by affirmative action. Neither of which are true.

Or do you have any actual research confirming this?


Yes, again with the research.

Naturally, it's part of the human condition (unless you're incredibly wise, which is something most people aren't, hence my point) to, when you're really down on your luck, blame other people for your problems. The person who got the job you needed instead of you because of the color of their skin or whether or not they have a vagina is the logical scapegoat. Evidently, less educated people (which like it or not, is the bulk of the lower class) are going to do less educated things, like becoming racists. It doesn't take a genius to realize this.

So basically you're just making shit up.

Got it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:50 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Yes, again with the research.

Naturally, it's part of the human condition (unless you're incredibly wise, which is something most people aren't, hence my point) to, when you're really down on your luck, blame other people for your problems. The person who got the job you needed instead of you because of the color of their skin or whether or not they have a vagina is the logical scapegoat. Evidently, less educated people (which like it or not, is the bulk of the lower class) are going to do less educated things, like becoming racists. It doesn't take a genius to realize this.

So basically you're just making shit up.

Got it.


Your daily link dosage: https://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/magazine/article/?article_id=43448

Are you so utterly narrowed in your thought that you can't contemplate something that isn't peer-reviewed? I know some mice that are better at thinking outside the box, literally.

User avatar
To Quoc Duc
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 167
Founded: Aug 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby To Quoc Duc » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:51 pm

Mavorpen wrote:So basically you're just making shit up.

Got it.


May I sig this? Oh please oh please?
The Republic of Tổ Quốc Đức


The United Colonies of Earth wrote:I prefer To Quoc Duc to willful ignorance any day!

User avatar
Kravanica
Senator
 
Posts: 4261
Founded: Aug 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kravanica » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:55 pm

To Quoc Duc wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So basically you're just making shit up.

Got it.


May I sig this? Oh please oh please?

This isn't a paricularly unique quote?
The Kravanican Realm (PMT)
I support Thermonuclear Warfare. Do you?
My nation does not represent my RL views

American and Jewish
Conservatarian with various "right-wing" leanings

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63261
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:56 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So basically you're just making shit up.

Got it.


Your daily link dosage: https://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/magazine/article/?article_id=43448

Are you so utterly narrowed in your thought that you can't contemplate something that isn't peer-reviewed? I know some mice that are better at thinking outside the box, literally.

No. You're making a claim that can be studied using Peer reviewed research. If you don't have any, your claim is just bullshit. Get over it.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63261
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:58 pm

To Quoc Duc wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So basically you're just making shit up.

Got it.


May I sig this? Oh please oh please?

It's not one of my better posts but sure, if you like.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:58 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Your daily link dosage: https://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/magazine/article/?article_id=43448

Are you so utterly narrowed in your thought that you can't contemplate something that isn't peer-reviewed? I know some mice that are better at thinking outside the box, literally.

No. You're making a claim that can be studied using Peer reviewed research. If you don't have any, your claim is Judy bullshit. Get over it.


Then by all means, point me to a peer-reviewed paper stating affirmative action doesn't increase racism.

Or are you incapable of seeing the logic in a knowledgeable statement?

User avatar
Kravanica
Senator
 
Posts: 4261
Founded: Aug 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kravanica » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:59 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Your daily link dosage: https://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/magazine/article/?article_id=43448

Are you so utterly narrowed in your thought that you can't contemplate something that isn't peer-reviewed? I know some mice that are better at thinking outside the box, literally.

No. You're making a claim that can be studied using Peer reviewed research. If you don't have any, your claim is just bullshit. Get over it.

I'm quite curious as to why being in the lower class would make you more likely to be less informed.
The Kravanican Realm (PMT)
I support Thermonuclear Warfare. Do you?
My nation does not represent my RL views

American and Jewish
Conservatarian with various "right-wing" leanings

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63261
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:59 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No. You're making a claim that can be studied using Peer reviewed research. If you don't have any, your claim is Judy bullshit. Get over it.


Then by all means, point me to a peer-reviewed paper stating affirmative action doesn't increase racism.

Or are you incapable of seeing the logic in a knowledgeable statement?

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Kravanica
Senator
 
Posts: 4261
Founded: Aug 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kravanica » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:59 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No. You're making a claim that can be studied using Peer reviewed research. If you don't have any, your claim is Judy bullshit. Get over it.


Then by all means, point me to a peer-reviewed paper stating affirmative action doesn't increase racism.

Or are you incapable of seeing the logic in a knowledgeable statement?

You're the one making the positive claim here. As such, the burden of proof falls upon you.
The Kravanican Realm (PMT)
I support Thermonuclear Warfare. Do you?
My nation does not represent my RL views

American and Jewish
Conservatarian with various "right-wing" leanings

User avatar
New Stephania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 366
Founded: Feb 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Stephania » Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:00 pm

Sanctissima wrote:Naturally, it's part of the human condition (unless you're incredibly wise, which is something most people aren't, hence my point) to, when you're really down on your luck, blame other people for your problems. The person who got the job you needed instead of you because of the color of their skin or whether or not they have a vagina is the logical scapegoat. Evidently, less educated people (which like it or not, is the bulk of the lower class) are going to do less educated things, like becoming racists. It doesn't take a genius to realize this.

I'm not talking specifically about Mavorpen but I think some people are under the impression that racist people come out of the womb twisting their mustache like a cartoon villain, and that these people are simply faceless enemies with no history and no capacity to better themselves. I think these people do a lot more harm than good when it comes to dealing with the problem of racism.
Nationality: English
Political Ideology: None
Manchester City Fan

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:00 pm

Kravanica wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No. You're making a claim that can be studied using Peer reviewed research. If you don't have any, your claim is just bullshit. Get over it.

I'm quite curious as to why being in the lower class would make you more likely to be less informed.


Is it not obvious? Poverty has a domino effect on one's life, education included.

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:09 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Then by all means, point me to a peer-reviewed paper stating affirmative action doesn't increase racism.

Or are you incapable of seeing the logic in a knowledgeable statement?

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof


And... here's your peer-reviewed article. You have fun now.

http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2014-09886-001/

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:10 pm

I've got a decent GPA and decent test scores so I receive daily invitations to apply to law schools, a decent number of those invitations specify my race. I'm not sure how not to be upset by the fact the color of my skin which we are so quick to call immaterial is having a concrete impact on my education.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Ameriganastan, Camtropia, Democratic Kingdom of South India, Dumb Ideologies, Empress Jolthena Pamlia, Giovanniland, Greater Britannian Realm, Immv Fressastin, Kewelsburg, Kurgao, Liberty Martyred, Marenmia-Ocasia, Ostroeuropa, Sanana, Satreburg 2, The New Age Empire, Valrifell, Valyxias, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads