Please enlighten us on your exceptional aim and insight into bodily organs.
Advertisement
by Vitaphone Racing » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:05 am
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Kernen » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:06 am
Wallenburg wrote:That's a big chunk of your side. Reconsider that statement. But yes, a minority should not be taken to represent a majority.
Just as the handful of total ban advocates does not represent the large swath of America in favor of mild regulation.
by Wallenburg » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:06 am
by Korva » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:07 am
by Post 9-11 Iraq » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:08 am
by Autonomous Titoists » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:10 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Sevvania wrote:Potentially 33% (of a very limited sample) of potential gun owners (or just random kids on the internet who found a gun-related thread) could hardly be considered a scientific study.
I'm not making assumptions of figures for the wider community, I'm making assumptions about the forum. I can only hope. In all seriousness, gun owners on these forums are seriously under-represented by the typical pro-gun crowd.
by Bezkoshtovnya » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:11 am
Wallenburg wrote:That's a big chunk of your side. Reconsider that statement. But yes, a minority should not be taken to represent a majority.
Just as the handful of total ban advocates does not represent the large swath of America in favor of mild regulation.
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Prezelly » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:12 am
Korva wrote:Prezelly wrote:How do you shoot to wound? Is that what you are asking
Considering a shot to the leg, groin, arm, etc all have the potential to be fatal and/or cause lifelong disability, yes that is what I am asking.
If you are justified in "shooting to wound" you can "shoot to kill".
If you aren't, then you will probably face the same criminal charges anyways.
by Bezkoshtovnya » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:13 am
Prezelly wrote:Korva wrote:Considering a shot to the leg, groin, arm, etc all have the potential to be fatal and/or cause lifelong disability, yes that is what I am asking.
If you are justified in "shooting to wound" you can "shoot to kill".
If you aren't, then you will probably face the same criminal charges anyways.
Shooting to wound and shooting to kill are different. To stop someone from fleeing the scene, like I said, shooting the foot or leg is enough to slow the perpetrator down so that you can detain and have the police arrest them. Yes it could potentially kill them, but that's the risk you take when you commit a crime against a gun wielding citizen
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Korva » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:14 am
Post 9-11 Iraq wrote:No, and repealing the Second Amendment wouldn't take away my right to keep and bear arms anyway. The Constitution grants no such right; it merely protects the right that I already have as a free human.
by Kernen » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:14 am
Prezelly wrote:Korva wrote:Considering a shot to the leg, groin, arm, etc all have the potential to be fatal and/or cause lifelong disability, yes that is what I am asking.
If you are justified in "shooting to wound" you can "shoot to kill".
If you aren't, then you will probably face the same criminal charges anyways.
Shooting to wound and shooting to kill are different. To stop someone from fleeing the scene, like I said, shooting the foot or leg is enough to slow the perpetrator down so that you can detain and have the police arrest them. Yes it could potentially kill them, but that's the risk you take when you commit a crime against a gun wielding citizen
by Sevvania » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:16 am
Prezelly wrote:Shooting to wound and shooting to kill are different.
by Southern Hampshire » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:17 am
by Kernen » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:18 am
by Bezkoshtovnya » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:18 am
Sevvania wrote:Prezelly wrote:Shooting to wound and shooting to kill are different.
The four cardinal rules of gun safety are:
"Assume every firearm is loaded.
"Never point a firearm at anything unless you intend to destroy it."
"Keep your finger off the trigger and out of the trigger guard until ready to fire."
"Be sure of your target and what is beyond it."
tl;dr: Never "shoot to wound".
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Prezelly » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:18 am
Sevvania wrote:Prezelly wrote:Shooting to wound and shooting to kill are different.
The four cardinal rules of gun safety are:
"Assume every firearm is loaded.
"Never point a firearm at anything unless you intend to Shoot it."
"Keep your finger off the trigger and out of the trigger guard until ready to fire."
"Be sure of your target and what is beyond it."
tl;dr: Never "shoot to wound".
by Kernen » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:19 am
Southern Hampshire wrote:I think that's a good stance ^
If someone is attacking or will attack you, shoot to kill
If someone is fleeing, shoot legs
If someone is surrendered, call police
If someone wants to take the life of my gun through legislation, their life will go with my gun.
by Wallenburg » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:20 am
Kernen wrote:Wallenburg wrote:That's a big chunk of your side. Reconsider that statement. But yes, a minority should not be taken to represent a majority.
Just as the handful of total ban advocates does not represent the large swath of America in favor of mild regulation.
Like your opinions on the Supreme Court decision regarding the interpretation of the Second Amendment, right?
by Kernen » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:21 am
Prezelly wrote:Sevvania wrote:The four cardinal rules of gun safety are:
"Assume every firearm is loaded.
"Never point a firearm at anything unless you intend to Shoot it."
"Keep your finger off the trigger and out of the trigger guard until ready to fire."
"Be sure of your target and what is beyond it."
tl;dr: Never "shoot to wound".
Fixed
by Sevvania » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:21 am
Southern Hampshire wrote:If someone is fleeing, shoot legs.
Prezelly wrote:Sevvania wrote:The four cardinal rules of gun safety are:
"Assume every firearm is loaded.
"Never point a firearm at anything unless you intend to Shoot it."
"Keep your finger off the trigger and out of the trigger guard until ready to fire."
"Be sure of your target and what is beyond it."
tl;dr: Never "shoot to wound".
Fixed
by Wallenburg » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:21 am
by To Quoc Duc » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:21 am
Insaeldor wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
I have reason to doubt that the post that says "god given right to an AR-15" is serious. Because, where in the Bible does it say "Thou shall not take away thou neighbor's AR-15?" Genesis?
As far as I know the bible doesn't say a thing as far as ones ability to own a weapon of any kind.
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:I prefer To Quoc Duc to willful ignorance any day!
by Korva » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:22 am
Wallenburg wrote:You also need a permit to own guns. Why would you need a permit to exercise your rights?
by Ifreann » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:23 am
Southern Hampshire wrote:I think that's a good stance ^
If someone is attacking or will attack you, shoot to kill
If someone is fleeing, shoot legs
If someone is surrendered, call police
If someone wants to take the life of my gun through legislation, their life will go with my gun.
by Wallenburg » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:24 am
Ifreann wrote:Southern Hampshire wrote:I think that's a good stance ^
If someone is attacking or will attack you, shoot to kill
If someone is fleeing, shoot legs
If someone is surrendered, call police
If someone wants to take the life of my gun through legislation, their life will go with my gun.
So what you're saying is that you will murder elected legislators who pass gun control laws you have a problem with. That sounds like terrorism to me.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Asherahan, Big Eyed Animation, Corporate Collective Salvation, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hidrandia, Jerzylvania, Kostane, Lycom, New Temecula, Niolia, Port Carverton, Stellar Colonies, The Lund, The Two Jerseys
Advertisement