Conglomerate of Iron wrote:Ripoll wrote:
No, it's rational. How can private ownership of the means of production go hand in hand with communal ownership and democratic work places? Who owns the workers, and what entity embodies the capital?
And aren't there some crazy anarchists who want to get rid of money altogether?
It will depend upon the community you live in. Some will be communes, others markets
Or you could live in the wilderness and not deal with people. Your call.
Also, money that is run by FIAT would be abolished. Crypto currencies, precious metals, ammunition, drugs, and other valuable goods would replace it.
Also: NO ONE OWNS WORKERS OTHER THAN THEMSELVES.
the worker would work in a job market, or in a commune. Whatever they want
...that's ridiculous, and are we just going to completely ignore interconnected markets?
Also all money is fiat. http://www.forbes.com/sites/pascalemman ... iat-money/
It's all based off of trust, and their value is whatever the people make it out to be. If by fiat you meant paper, well paper is just in all reality really efficient and much more practical than the rest. Gold and other limited currencies just limit the ability for the money supply to grow and lead to deflationary cycles that impoverish the middle class.
If what you said in this instance alone is true, that's reason enough for sensible people who actually understand how our society works to just drop the idea of anarchism all together.