That doesn't answer anything, how are you supposed to enforce the rules?
Advertisement
by Ripoll » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:35 pm
by MERIZoC » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:35 pm
by Skeckoa » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:35 pm
Skeckoa wrote: If the state was the legitimate owner of the land in question than it would be fair for them to ask you to leave (this is why it is okay-ish for them to ask you to leave the White House if you are being a nuisance). Do you think that the state has ownership of all the land inside its borders?
by The Confederacy of Nationalism » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:35 pm
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist
by Democratic Koyro » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:35 pm
Merizoc wrote:Geilinor wrote:Many anarchists support violent revolution. A violent overthrow will involve threatening or killing people who oppose you.
Now, as someone who doesn't support violent revolution, I'll say this: Fighting back against a state that's oppressing you is no different than fighting back against a mugger. You didn't initiate violence.
by The Slavians » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:36 pm
The New Sea Territory wrote:The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Not magically. Unless you honestly believe the U.S. Army is as terrible as Al-Qaida.
So anarchism will never actually be a worldwide or even national thing.
Considering the US Army has supported more brutal regimes and killed more people, yes. Ideologically, no, historically, yes. Shocker, I know.
I was simply carrying on with his use of the word "push". There are theories for the implementation and practice of anarchism. Such as syndicalism, agorism or, though I don't advocate it, violent revolution.
by MERIZoC » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:36 pm
Democratic Koyro wrote:Merizoc wrote:Now, as someone who doesn't support violent revolution, I'll say this: Fighting back against a state that's oppressing you is no different than fighting back against a mugger. You didn't initiate violence.
You have no right to commit an act of terrorism against the State.
by The Confederacy of Nationalism » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:36 pm
Merizoc wrote:Geilinor wrote:Many anarchists support violent revolution. A violent overthrow will involve threatening or killing people who oppose you.
Now, as someone who doesn't support violent revolution, I'll say this: Fighting back against a state that's oppressing you is no different than fighting back against a mugger. You didn't initiate violence.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist
by The Slavians » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:36 pm
Democratic Koyro wrote:Merizoc wrote:Now, as someone who doesn't support violent revolution, I'll say this: Fighting back against a state that's oppressing you is no different than fighting back against a mugger. You didn't initiate violence.
You have no right to commit an act of terrorism against the State.
by Geilinor » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:37 pm
Merizoc wrote:Geilinor wrote:Many anarchists support violent revolution. A violent overthrow will involve threatening or killing people who oppose you.
Now, as someone who doesn't support violent revolution, I'll say this: Fighting back against a state that's oppressing you is no different than fighting back against a mugger. You didn't initiate violence.
by Camelza » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:37 pm
by Democratic Koyro » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:37 pm
by Lockean Georgeville » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:37 pm
Left-Libertarian | What is Left-Libertarianism?
+VoteMatch | +ISideWith | (UK) | +Political Typology | +Pro's and Con's
German-American | Anglo-Catholic in training| INTJ | Chaotic GoodRemember that you are dust and to dust you will return.
by Solaray » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:37 pm
Skeckoa wrote:Solaray wrote:No, its more like fighting back against your landlord when he comes to collect.Skeckoa wrote: If the state was the legitimate owner of the land in question than it would be fair for them to ask you to leave (this is why it is okay-ish for them to ask you to leave the White House if you are being a nuisance). Do you think that the state has ownership of all the land inside its borders?
by Ripoll » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:39 pm
The New Sea Territory wrote:Geilinor wrote:Most statists don't support violence against innocent people.
Knowingly. Though, this might be scary for some American statists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_au ... ted_States
by Democratic Koyro » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:39 pm
by The Slavians » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:39 pm
by The Confederacy of Nationalism » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:39 pm
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist
by Lockean Georgeville » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:39 pm
Left-Libertarian | What is Left-Libertarianism?
+VoteMatch | +ISideWith | (UK) | +Political Typology | +Pro's and Con's
German-American | Anglo-Catholic in training| INTJ | Chaotic GoodRemember that you are dust and to dust you will return.
by Ripoll » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:39 pm
by The Confederacy of Nationalism » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:40 pm
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist
by Geilinor » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:40 pm
The New Sea Territory wrote:Geilinor wrote:Most statists don't support violence against innocent people.
Knowingly. Though, this might be scary for some American statists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_au ... ted_States
by Skeckoa » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:40 pm
How do you believe the state came to be the rightful owner of all the land?
by Camelza » Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:40 pm
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:Camelza wrote:Like in real life anarchist societies, if someone disagrees, he/she just leaves, or is forced to leave since he/she poses a thrat to the continuation of the community. It's a love-it-or-leave-it case.
Potentially this is why there has never been a long-lived anarchy
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Big Eyed Animation, Ethel mermania, Europa Undivided, Hidrandia, HISPIDA, Ifreann, Ineva, Kohr, Kostane, Kubra, Lagene, Love Peace and Friendship, Maximum Imperium Rex, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Ors Might, Shrillland, Southland, Tesseris, The Lone Alliance, Xind
Advertisement