Advertisement
by Warner Channel » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:38 pm
by Dysian » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:45 pm
Warner Channel wrote:Like Ballotonia, I am not a WA member, but there is no such category as "Liberation." Sorry.
by Gaiah » Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:41 pm
by Naivetry » Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:59 pm
Merieu wrote:It's obvious why you would want to free France, but you need to look at the other side of things. Macedon worked pretty damn hard to invade France and oust nearly every single person there, especially a region of that size and magnitude.
Dysian wrote:perhaps they should also implement one for invading. after all, it is a process very similar to liberating. Yeah, taking the delegate position with the help of a WA resolution. That would be great. Wussy, but great.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:30 pm
Gaiah wrote:Liberate france
Category: Liberation
Nominee (region): france
Proposed by: Gaiah
Description: France has been the major french region and place for nationstates tourists since his born.
In May 2009, Macedon has taken control of the region, password-protected it and eject old natives one by one.
As the former delegate of France, i call the World Assembly to remove the password of the region which became like "dead" because the invader is alone and resign to WA, so the password would last forever and no more french nations can reclaim their region.
by Todd McCloud » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:36 am
by Dysian » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:01 pm
by Goobergunchia » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:14 pm
by Sirocco » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:17 pm
Dysian wrote:Kiko says he was trying to refound France, when suddenly his nation got logged out BY ITSELF. By the time he logged in again (a VERY short period), France had been refounded.
Yes, this DOES look like a work of an admin/mod. And plus I see Sirroco's nation in France, and that makes it more than clear.
I was joking at first, when you made update 6 AM for Macedonia and submitted a Liberation category with the region of Macedon in mind, but now I'm serious. Let this serve as proof of the blatant injustice done against the Macedonians in Nationstates, and that we are so famous, that even mods are being haters
by Dysian » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:21 pm
by Sirocco » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:41 pm
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:45 am
Todd McCloud wrote:France has been refounded, making this resolution now defunct.
All eyes should now be on Pakistan, a passworded Macedonian region.
by Dysian » Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:49 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Todd McCloud wrote:France has been refounded, making this resolution now defunct.
All eyes should now be on Pakistan, a passworded Macedonian region.
Okay then, I will prepare that (OOC: now I finally got mobile Broadband!)
by Todd McCloud » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:19 am
Dysian wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Todd McCloud wrote:France has been refounded, making this resolution now defunct.
All eyes should now be on Pakistan, a passworded Macedonian region.
Okay then, I will prepare that (OOC: now I finally got mobile Broadband!)
oh my goodness, this IS turning into a crusade against Macedon!
Don't you people have other things to be obsessed with? No really, you're making us look so cool...
by Northern Chittowa » Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:29 pm
Dysian wrote:Warner Channel wrote:Like Ballotonia, I am not a WA member, but there is no such category as "Liberation." Sorry.
well, apparently now there is...
perhaps they should also implement one for invading. after all, it is a process very similar to liberating. Yeah, taking the delegate position with the help of a WA resolution. That would be great. Wussy, but great.
by Veilyonia » Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:34 pm
Dysian wrote:Warner Channel wrote:Like Ballotonia, I am not a WA member, but there is no such category as "Liberation." Sorry.
well, apparently now there is...
perhaps they should also implement one for invading. after all, it is a process very similar to liberating. Yeah, taking the delegate position with the help of a WA resolution. That would be great. Wussy, but great.
On the other hand, you got writing a WA proposal and submitting it... yeah, REAL hard work to take over a region. Perhaps, as I stated before, in the future the REAL invaders will be those who do it through a WA proposal. Pathetic.
by Dysian » Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:39 am
Veilyonia wrote:Dysian wrote:Warner Channel wrote:Like Ballotonia, I am not a WA member, but there is no such category as "Liberation." Sorry.
well, apparently now there is...
perhaps they should also implement one for invading. after all, it is a process very similar to liberating. Yeah, taking the delegate position with the help of a WA resolution. That would be great. Wussy, but great.
Funny, in the thread for 'Liberate belgium," you expressed your ardent distaste for raiding and politics interfering with one another...
by Veilyonia » Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:35 pm
Dysian wrote:Veilyonia wrote:Funny, in the thread for 'Liberate belgium," you expressed your ardent distaste for raiding and politics interfering with one another...
Of course, I was being IRONIC when I said it would be *great*.
And Northern Chittowa, if we target a region for password-liberation, ALL the fendas will know that we are trying to invade it. Much help for us huh?
EDIT: When someone says: "That's all I will say", it means he is left without any argument. Which in this case, Todd, is very true. You have nothing to prove that raiding Belgium (taking the delegate position) wasn't actually raiding.
by Northern Chittowa » Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:47 pm
Veilyonia wrote:Dysian wrote:Veilyonia wrote:Funny, in the thread for 'Liberate belgium," you expressed your ardent distaste for raiding and politics interfering with one another...
Of course, I was being IRONIC when I said it would be *great*.
And Northern Chittowa, if we target a region for password-liberation, ALL the fendas will know that we are trying to invade it. Much help for us huh?
"Being ironic"... I'll skip criticizing your poor word choice and get to the heart of the matter. Yes, you are right about the fact that all the defenders will know if raiders target a region for a liberation. Did you ever stop to think that it is the same case for defenders? If defenders target a region for a liberation, all the raiders will know that we are trying to liberate it. It is hardly our fault that, unlike defenders, most raiders take little interest in invasions that do not affect their region. Secondly, how much more do you hope to accomplish with the password in place?
by Dysian » Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:11 pm
by Northern Chittowa » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:29 am
Dysian wrote:raiding, invading, region killing, blah blah blah... it's all words man. no matter how you call it. As I've said before, I'm not very strong on words - I let deeds speak for me.
by Dysian » Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:01 pm
by Northern Chittowa » Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:38 pm
Dysian wrote:deeds will reinforce my overall position.
by Veilyonia » Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:13 pm
Dysian wrote:raiding, invading, region killing, blah blah blah... it's all words man. no matter how you call it. As I've said before, I'm not very strong on words - I let deeds speak for me.
by Dysian » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:52 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Liverland, Votak Matim
Advertisement