I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE WITH DADDY ISSUES SO BIG THAT THEY ARE THAT DESPERATE.
Advertisement
by ESTU » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:25 pm
by UBS » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:26 pm
New Frenco Empire wrote:UBS wrote:Yes and there is no guarantee a kid will stay in the USA,but you still have to say the pledge (at least to my understanding, I only came to america in high school,and they stop the pledge in high school)
And kids don't have to say it if they don't want. At least, they shouldn't be, but some American schools are backwards.
Not to mention, a couple patriotic words is nothing like dickskin.
by Esalonia » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:28 pm
Tech level: NS MT
Esalonian Factbook *does not use NS Stats anymore*
DEFCON: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Member of these Multilateral Organizations
Fortitudinem wrote:They're a budding power. Pun intended.
Marquesan wrote:You have a damned fine advanced understanding of interior and exterior ballistics for a fifteen year old.
Gim wrote:Esalonia wrote:Certainly me. My best pic so far.
You would be an excellent Filipino Super Junior member. :p
Facebook chat:
Sum frind: okay klng? (Are you okay?)
Me: Yes. I am definitely okay in a mental asylum
Sum frind: ?
by Occupied Deutschland » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:29 pm
Communal Earth wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:1) This is not the case.
2) This is scientifically proven to not be the case.
3) I have seen nothing to prove this, and the results of the similar claim in point #2 (and the anti-circs 'side' history of not paying attention to the science on point #2) leads me towards skepticism.
4) *shrug*
I heard differently.
by ODMS Babel » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:31 pm
by Marcurix » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:33 pm
by UBS » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:35 pm
ODMS Babel wrote:ESTU wrote:
I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE WITH DADDY ISSUES SO BIG THAT THEY ARE THAT DESPERATE.
What do 'daddy issues' have to do with foreskin restoration?UBS wrote:You can't, parents have the right to choice what medical procedures they want to take.
So should parents be allowed to change their child's sex because they wanted a daughter rather than a son? Parents have a right to choose medical procedures for their children, not the right to enforce whatever body modifications they see fit on their children.
by Saiwania » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:36 pm
Benuty wrote:Actually it can, if you gain enough money for foreskin restoration techniques.
by UBS » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:37 pm
Marcurix wrote:Aside from the occasional medical reason, don't see the point of it myself.
Of course this comes from a European.
by ODMS Babel » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:38 pm
UBS wrote:ODMS Babel wrote:
What do 'daddy issues' have to do with foreskin restoration?
So should parents be allowed to change their child's sex because they wanted a daughter rather than a son? Parents have a right to choose medical procedures for their children, not the right to enforce whatever body modifications they see fit on their children.
Circumcision has been recognised as a medical procedure by just about every country.
by Marcurix » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:39 pm
by UBS » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:42 pm
Marcurix wrote:UBS wrote:I as well am a European, but just be causes something is unpopular does not mean we should ignore it.
It's not about ignoring it, its well recognized that the majority of circumcisions in North America are of habit rather than any actual medical concern.
You can live with or without it, it doesn't need to be a one or the other.
by New Frenco Empire » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:43 pm
UBS wrote:New Frenco Empire wrote:And kids don't have to say it if they don't want. At least, they shouldn't be, but some American schools are backwards.
Not to mention, a couple patriotic words is nothing like dickskin.
I have a question (if your american) in kindergarten did you know what a PLEDGE OF ALLEGATIONS meant
by Marcurix » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:44 pm
by Alyakia » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:52 pm
by Sebastianbourg » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:57 pm
by Blazedtown » Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:04 pm
Communal Earth wrote:Ban the practice all together. It will never be consensual. The male will always regret it because it decreases sensitivity and comfort and the practice itself is archaic and totally unneeded.
by Torsiedelle » Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:06 pm
by New Frenco Empire » Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:07 pm
by Liriena » Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:12 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:13 pm
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.
by Sun Wukong » Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:19 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Hidrandia, Kannap, Kreushia, Plan Neonie, Ravemath, Tungstan, Valentine Z
Advertisement