NATION

PASSWORD

RESOLVED: Atheist Airman Allowed To Modify Oath

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23852
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The Two Jerseys » Fri Sep 05, 2014 2:35 pm

Antarticaria wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Did you enlist in the Chair Force?


Nope Army. I was sworn in from a Naval Officer though. (Strange enough in of itself).
Still very strange why they would go back to forcing that segment of the swear in.

Because this is the US Chair Force, and someone with nothing to do before his afternoon tee time was looking at the enlistment oath and said "Holy shit! Title 10 of the US Code says the enlistment oath has to have 'so help me God' in it! It shouldn't be optional!". So the USCF changed the rules to "fix" this "problem".

Like I said before, it's typical Chair Force fuckwittery. Just like the McPeak Uniform.
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Kravanica
Senator
 
Posts: 4261
Founded: Aug 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kravanica » Fri Sep 05, 2014 2:36 pm

Benuty wrote:
Kravanica wrote:This is stupid. Religion needs to be removed from government and the military.

Nonsense secularism needs to be enforced on a wide scale within the military, and government to avoid discrimination against people on the basis of religion. Besides if we remove religion from the military then people will bitch about not being able to have access to chaplaincy this includes secular chaplains as well.

So... We agree?
The Kravanican Realm (PMT)
I support Thermonuclear Warfare. Do you?
My nation does not represent my RL views

American and Jewish
Conservatarian with various "right-wing" leanings

User avatar
Antarticaria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1739
Founded: Sep 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Antarticaria » Fri Sep 05, 2014 2:39 pm

The Two Jerseys wrote:
Antarticaria wrote:
Nope Army. I was sworn in from a Naval Officer though. (Strange enough in of itself).
Still very strange why they would go back to forcing that segment of the swear in.

Because this is the US Chair Force, and someone with nothing to do before his afternoon tee time was looking at the enlistment oath and said "Holy shit! Title 10 of the US Code says the enlistment oath has to have 'so help me God' in it! It shouldn't be optional!". So the USCF changed the rules to "fix" this "problem".

Like I said before, it's typical Chair Force fuckwittery. Just like the McPeak Uniform.



All too true.
Just a average person! Is that too straight forward?

User avatar
Ereria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 846
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ereria » Fri Sep 05, 2014 3:28 pm

Couldn't you just swear by Cthulhu? Are you so insecure in your belief that you can't just swear by something you don't believe in?


Yes I would, I could swear by the Christian god or the Jewish god or anything like that. It doesn't mean anything to me and if it gives me something I want, I would do it no doubt (im a muslim)
"Vatan savunmasında gereğinden fazla merhamet vatana ihanettir."
- Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

Kılıç kınından çıkmadıkça it sürüsü dağılmaz.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Fri Sep 05, 2014 3:31 pm

Ereria wrote:
Couldn't you just swear by Cthulhu? Are you so insecure in your belief that you can't just swear by something you don't believe in?


Yes I would, I could swear by the Christian god or the Jewish god or anything like that. It doesn't mean anything to me and if it gives me something I want, I would do it no doubt (im a muslim)


So oaths mean nothing to you. Got it.

User avatar
Intelectual Atheists
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 107
Founded: Mar 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Intelectual Atheists » Fri Sep 05, 2014 3:32 pm

If you look at my nation's name, you probably already know how I feel about this.
I believe in the separation of church and planet.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Fri Sep 05, 2014 3:35 pm

Intelectual Atheists wrote:If you look at my nation's name, you probably already know how I feel about this.


Is the misspelling of "Intellectual" meant to be ironic?

User avatar
Intelectual Atheists
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 107
Founded: Mar 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Intelectual Atheists » Fri Sep 05, 2014 3:39 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Intelectual Atheists wrote:If you look at my nation's name, you probably already know how I feel about this.


Is the misspelling of "Intellectual" meant to be ironic?

Yes.

k, that's enough derailing for now.
I believe in the separation of church and planet.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:18 pm

Intelectual Atheists wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Is the misspelling of "Intellectual" meant to be ironic?

Yes.

k, that's enough derailing for now.


It's just that if you're making fun of atheists by misspelling the word "Intellectual", then that would indicate that you might be against the man's refusal to take the oath.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19482
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:20 pm

If you are called to jury duty, and are there asked to take an oath to ensure the faithful performance of your duties as juror, you may respectfully decline and say "I do solemnly affirm" instead of "I swear before God".

I have done so, and the judge was wise and courteous and accepted my affirmation.

(Mennonites do not swear an oath)

This principle has been established for generations.

So the military is wrong here.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Intelectual Atheists
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 107
Founded: Mar 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Intelectual Atheists » Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:31 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Intelectual Atheists wrote:Yes.

k, that's enough derailing for now.


It's just that if you're making fun of atheists by misspelling the word "Intellectual", then that would indicate that you might be against the man's refusal to take the oath.

It was a joke, I am an atheist myself.
I believe in the separation of church and planet.

User avatar
Greater Weselton
Senator
 
Posts: 3703
Founded: Aug 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Weselton » Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:31 pm

I am just glad the oath still mentions God. They shouldn't be forced to swear by God though.
I am not a Nazi in real life.
_[' ]_
(-_Q)
If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature!
Proud Member of theConfederation of Sovereign Nations

User avatar
True American States
Diplomat
 
Posts: 581
Founded: Aug 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby True American States » Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:38 pm

As a Christian its noted in the Bible not to swear oaths but to let your yes mean yes and your no mean no. Through if I was confronted with that position as a Christian I would opt to not say that phrase either. So I understand his ethics and his moral boundaries. As a former atheist however I wouldnt care about such an empty phrase anyway in the first place and I would have just said the damn thing to get it over with. If my goal was trying to re enlist nothings gonna stop me from doing just that. I mean if your willing to be potentially blown out the air what's under God gonna do for ya? This guy could be blowing up ISIS right now. Gsssh. But that's just me.
Last edited by True American States on Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:i don't know you, but I suspect on some level, you're an actual conservative, not one of the ragbag of gun nuts, arch-reactionaries, fringe politics aficionados, and anarcho-capitalists hijacking the term nowadays.

Terstotzka wrote:Bit fancy, bit cool, But still pretty American :p

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177095
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:52 pm

Ereria wrote:
Couldn't you just swear by Cthulhu? Are you so insecure in your belief that you can't just swear by something you don't believe in?


Yes I would, I could swear by the Christian god or the Jewish god or anything like that. It doesn't mean anything to me and if it gives me something I want, I would do it no doubt (im a muslim)

Lying is acceptable in Islam?
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 138142
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ethel mermania » Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:56 pm

technically the airforce is correct, they cant change the oath as it would be a violation of federal law to do so.

now the aha is also correct, the law is unconstitutional and they should sue to get the law overturned. the blame for this goes to congress. i hope the kid wins and gets a nice fat payday for his effort.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177095
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:00 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:technically the airforce is correct, they cant change the oath as it would be a violation of federal law to do so.

now the aha is also correct, the law is unconstitutional and they should sue to get the law overturned. the blame for this goes to congress. i hope the kid wins and gets a nice fat payday for his effort.

He'll have the finest chair they can provide.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 138142
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ethel mermania » Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:06 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:technically the airforce is correct, they cant change the oath as it would be a violation of federal law to do so.

now the aha is also correct, the law is unconstitutional and they should sue to get the law overturned. the blame for this goes to congress. i hope the kid wins and gets a nice fat payday for his effort.

He'll have the finest chair they can provide.

flying high in the chairforce? i didnt know you had friends in the army.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10258
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:08 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Ereria wrote:
Yes I would, I could swear by the Christian god or the Jewish god or anything like that. It doesn't mean anything to me and if it gives me something I want, I would do it no doubt (im a muslim)

Lying is acceptable in Islam?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya

Taqiyya has been relative widespread in Shia history, whereas the Sunni generally go after a somewhat similar concept of idtirar.

Then again, swearing by other than Allah is committing the sin of Shirk, which, if made on the triune Christian God concept which Islam considers polytheistic would essentially turn into Shirke-e-Akbar. Which is an assured one way to hell with no return in Islamic theology. Thus am uncertain if Taqiyya extends so far as to proclaim the Christian God.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177095
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:10 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:He'll have the finest chair they can provide.

flying high in the chairforce? i didnt know you had friends in the army.

Interservice rivalry is funny, and not being in any service I get to mock them all. Except the Coast Guard. You don't fuck with the Coast Guard.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
WestRedMaple
Minister
 
Posts: 3068
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WestRedMaple » Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:14 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Ereria wrote:
Yes I would, I could swear by the Christian god or the Jewish god or anything like that. It doesn't mean anything to me and if it gives me something I want, I would do it no doubt (im a muslim)


So oaths mean nothing to you. Got it.



I'll swear by anything you like....how much the oath means is going to depend on what you want me to swear by.

If I'm going to swear on my honor, then that is something I'll be taking seriously. If you want me to swear by a god I believe is imaginary, then any meaning in the oath will be imaginary as well. That's up to the person asking for the oath to choose wisely

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:18 pm

The Flood wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:Some - indeed, many - atheists make their "belief in non-religion" as much a part of their self-concept as Christians do their belief in Jesus.
So why is it automatically less important to them?
Such an atheist would be a fedora tipper, I have no sympathy for fedora tippers.


The Flood wrote:I don't want to see him win, because any win for the militant secularist crowd is a bad thing, automatically.


....Wow, I can just feel the Christian love emanating from your posts. According to you, it's better that this person - who has already completed one term of service with a good-enough record to be asked to sign up for a second, which doesn't stop you vilifying him - be forced to swear a false oath and violate his conscience than have the reference to God removed. It's better for you that the Constitution be routinely violated by the same military that is supposed to defend it, than that the "militant secularist crowd" gets to "win" - a "win" that wouldn't have been necessary until the Dominionists sneaked in the change to the oath of service last year, since before then a serviceman in any branch could request the version of the oath that omitted references to God.

In short, as far as you're concerned, it's better for people innocent of any crime to suffer, than that your recent victory in pushing your religion down others' throats be overturned, because somehow that would constitute a win for the "militant secularists". As opposed to this oath's current procedure, which is 'only' a win for batshit Dominionists and therefore acceptable to you.

Jesus had a word for people like you - it started with "P". He preached that people like you had already received, here on Earth, all the reward you ever would for your grand shows of piety and allegiance to God. He preached that people like you were as whited sepulchers - clean, elegant and pious on the outside, but full of dust and moldy bones within.

Since you seem to like religious invocations, I'll leave you with one:

John 13 35 wrote:By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.


Can you honestly claim to be Jesus' disciple?
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:22 pm

WestRedMaple wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
So oaths mean nothing to you. Got it.



I'll swear by anything you like....how much the oath means is going to depend on what you want me to swear by.

If I'm going to swear on my honor, then that is something I'll be taking seriously. If you want me to swear by a god I believe is imaginary, then any meaning in the oath will be imaginary as well. That's up to the person asking for the oath to choose wisely


And there's the problem. I, for one, don't want the military of a country bound to obey its oaths on the force of some being that they themselves consider to be imaginary.

I'd much rather have them swear on their honour - for everyone likes to think he has honour.

-The West Coast- wrote:He can easily report his commanding officer, because all men and women are given the choice to say the oath how they like, with whatever religious denomination they are.


According to the story, the USAF's version of the oath was quietly changed by Congress last year to remove the option of taking out the "So help me God" part.

Ifreann wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:flying high in the chairforce? i didnt know you had friends in the army.

Interservice rivalry is funny, and not being in any service I get to mock them all. Except the Coast Guard. You don't fuck with the Coast Guard.


Hey, it wasn't the Great White Airforce or the Great White Army that Teddy Roosevelt sent around the world to show that America was someone to respect, now was it?

Ifreann wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:technically the airforce is correct, they cant change the oath as it would be a violation of federal law to do so.

now the aha is also correct, the law is unconstitutional and they should sue to get the law overturned. the blame for this goes to congress. i hope the kid wins and gets a nice fat payday for his effort.

He'll have the finest chair they can provide.


Only before 1630 hours.

Pope Joan wrote:If you are called to jury duty, and are there asked to take an oath to ensure the faithful performance of your duties as juror, you may respectfully decline and say "I do solemnly affirm" instead of "I swear before God".

I have done so, and the judge was wise and courteous and accepted my affirmation.

(Mennonites do not swear an oath)

This principle has been established for generations.

So the military is wrong here.


B-b-but, Christian nation! Judaeo-Christian Founding Principles! Dirty atheists!

It's not obeyin' Gawd enough that made 9/11 happen, too!
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39220
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:24 pm

New Chalcedon wrote:
WestRedMaple wrote:

I'll swear by anything you like....how much the oath means is going to depend on what you want me to swear by.

If I'm going to swear on my honor, then that is something I'll be taking seriously. If you want me to swear by a god I believe is imaginary, then any meaning in the oath will be imaginary as well. That's up to the person asking for the oath to choose wisely


And there's the problem. I, for one, don't want the military of a country bound to obey its oaths on the force of some being that they themselves consider to be imaginary.

I'd much rather have them swear on their honour - for everyone likes to think he has honour.

-The West Coast- wrote:He can easily report his commanding officer, because all men and women are given the choice to say the oath how they like, with whatever religious denomination they are.


According to the story, the USAF's version of the oath was quietly changed by Congress last year to remove the option of taking out the "So help me God" part.

Ifreann wrote:Interservice rivalry is funny, and not being in any service I get to mock them all. Except the Coast Guard. You don't fuck with the Coast Guard.


Hey, it wasn't the Great White Airforce or the Great White Army that Teddy Roosevelt sent around the world to show that America was someone to respect, now was it?

Ifreann wrote:He'll have the finest chair they can provide.


Only before 1630 hours.

Pope Joan wrote:If you are called to jury duty, and are there asked to take an oath to ensure the faithful performance of your duties as juror, you may respectfully decline and say "I do solemnly affirm" instead of "I swear before God".

I have done so, and the judge was wise and courteous and accepted my affirmation.

(Mennonites do not swear an oath)

This principle has been established for generations.

So the military is wrong here.


B-b-but, Christian nation! Judaeo-Christian Founding Principles! Dirty atheists!

It's not obeyin' Gawd enough that made 9/11 happen, too!


Oh good my favorite myth to dispel :P.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. My posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate. Participated in the former Roleplay Groups: Varsity Row, Thought Cafe, and the Pub. Supporter of a Free Tibet Christian Pacifist Christian Vegetarian

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:25 pm

The Two Jerseys wrote:
Antarticaria wrote:
Nope Army. I was sworn in from a Naval Officer though. (Strange enough in of itself).
Still very strange why they would go back to forcing that segment of the swear in.

Because this is the US Chair Force, and someone with nothing to do before his afternoon tee time was looking at the enlistment oath and said "Holy shit! Title 10 of the US Code says the enlistment oath has to have 'so help me God' in it! It shouldn't be optional!". So the USCF changed the rules to "fix" this "problem".

Like I said before, it's typical Chair Force fuckwittery. Just like the McPeak Uniform.


If your concern is distant, with a temperate climate and good hotels, and can be solved by one or two low risk, high altitude bombing runs, please press 2 for the United States Air Force. Please note this service is not available after 1630 hours, or on weekends. Special consideration will be given to customers requiring satellite or stealth technology who can provide additional research and development funding.


^ The USAF in short.
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:25 pm

New Chalcedon wrote:
According to the story, the USAF's version of the oath was quietly changed by Congress last year to remove the option of taking out the "So help me God" part.

How did that shit get through Congress without someone questioning the constitutionality of it?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Saiwania-, Darkwoke, Hwiteard, Marenmia-Ocasia, Rusozak, The Lone Alliance, The Two Jerseys, Valrifell, Yebu

Advertisement

Remove ads