Source?
A life's worth of taxpayer dollars seems like it would be much more than a single injection to me, if you have evidence stating otherwise I'd like to see it.
Advertisement
by Immoren » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:19 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Memell » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:21 pm
by Othelos » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:21 pm
by Prezelly » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:25 pm
Othelos wrote:Rephesus wrote:Source?
A life's worth of taxpayer dollars seems like it would be much more than a single injection to me, if you have evidence stating otherwise I'd like to see it.
costs associated, not just the execution itself.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29552692/ns/u ... AoMqPldWSo
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphilli ... h-penalty/
by Great Nepal » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:26 pm
Prezelly wrote:Othelos wrote:costs associated, not just the execution itself.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29552692/ns/u ... AoMqPldWSo
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphilli ... h-penalty/
In the NBC article it says that prisoners on death row in cali are there for twenty years in some cases. Twenty years is the life sentence in some states. The appeals system needs reforming and if it were reformed it would be more cost effective to kill
by Prezelly » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:28 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Prezelly wrote:In the NBC article it says that prisoners on death row in cali are there for twenty years in some cases. Twenty years is the life sentence in some states. The appeals system needs reforming and if it were reformed it would be more cost effective to kill
While increasing the possibility of executing an innocent person, to me that is bad tradeoff.
by Great Nepal » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:30 pm
by Prezelly » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:33 pm
by Othelos » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:52 pm
Prezelly wrote:Othelos wrote:costs associated, not just the execution itself.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29552692/ns/u ... AoMqPldWSo
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphilli ... h-penalty/
In the NBC article it says that prisoners on death row in cali are there for twenty years in some cases. Twenty years is the life sentence in some states. The appeals system needs reforming and if it were reformed it would be more cost effective to kill
by Prezelly » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:53 pm
Othelos wrote:Prezelly wrote:In the NBC article it says that prisoners on death row in cali are there for twenty years in some cases. Twenty years is the life sentence in some states. The appeals system needs reforming and if it were reformed it would be more cost effective to kill
Again, the only way to do that would be to get rid of the appeals process.
by Prezelly » Fri Sep 05, 2014 1:00 pm
by Great Nepal » Fri Sep 05, 2014 1:08 pm
Prezelly wrote:Great Nepal wrote:How do you plan on reforming these systems such that cost will be reduced while ensuring person is guilty beyond shadow of a doubt.
Mandatory DNA analysis of possible culprits would help significantly with little cost added.
Minus the years of waiting and it should be less costly
by Totalise » Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:00 pm
Scomagia wrote:Totalise wrote:actually yeah it dose. serial murderers and rapists are psychopaths people who can't feel for others
First, Psychopath is a medical term that I know you aren't qualified to assign. Second, the ability of person to rehabilitate and function in society requires first that the society tries to rehabilitate them. That hasn't happened, so we can't say with any sort of certainty who is or is not able to be rehabilitated.
by The Orson Empire » Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:04 pm
Noord wrote:A humane death, no doubt.
by True American States » Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:36 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:i don't know you, but I suspect on some level, you're an actual conservative, not one of the ragbag of gun nuts, arch-reactionaries, fringe politics aficionados, and anarcho-capitalists hijacking the term nowadays.
Terstotzka wrote:Bit fancy, bit cool, But still pretty American :p
by Nazi Flower Power » Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:37 pm
Benuty wrote:Gauthier wrote:
We just need to get rid of the appeals process. *nod nod*
Nothing like wait 15 years on death row spending much of it mentally rotting away to the point where mental illness becomes such a massive issue it is often swept under the rug. I mean there going to die anyway so why not treat them like shit too?
*Nods*.
by True American States » Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:47 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:i don't know you, but I suspect on some level, you're an actual conservative, not one of the ragbag of gun nuts, arch-reactionaries, fringe politics aficionados, and anarcho-capitalists hijacking the term nowadays.
Terstotzka wrote:Bit fancy, bit cool, But still pretty American :p
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Eahland, Ifreann, Philjia, The Archregimancy, The Two Jerseys, USHALLNOTPASS, Utquiagvik, Vanuzgard
Advertisement