Finland SSR wrote:First, no.
Second, even plants have feelings and thoughts too. What, is chopping a tree for woo the same as murder?
I chop down plenty of trees for woo.
Advertisement

by Kainesia » Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:15 am
Finland SSR wrote:First, no.
Second, even plants have feelings and thoughts too. What, is chopping a tree for woo the same as murder?

by The Alma Mater » Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:17 am
Kiruri wrote:Why is this thread not dead already? xP

by Kiruri » Tue Jun 17, 2014 3:45 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:Kiruri wrote:Why is this thread not dead already? xP
Because it is an intruiging philsophical question that people have been asking for centuries - with very different answers.
I am still amazed that people are unaware of that.. surely many people here have had at least basic courses in philosophy ?

by Lavan Tiri » Tue Jun 17, 2014 3:58 pm
Finland SSR wrote:First, no.
Second, even plants have feelings and thoughts too. What, is chopping a tree for wool the same as murder?

Big Jim P wrote:I like the way you think.
Constaniana wrote:Ah, so you were dropped on your head. This explains a lot.
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:Snarky bastard.
The Grey Wolf wrote:You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.
Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:I'm not sure whether to laugh because thIs is the best satire I've ever seen or be very very afraid because someone actually thinks all this so.... have a cookie?
John Holland wrote: John Holland

by Solaray » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:00 pm
Lavan Tiri wrote:Finland SSR wrote:First, no.
Second, even plants have feelings and thoughts too. What, is chopping a tree for wool the same as murder?
They do? How does one find out if trees have feelings? Physiological analysis....of an organism with no capacity to communicate(as far as I know), or by setting it on fire see if it cries?

by Lavan Tiri » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:02 pm
Big Jim P wrote:I like the way you think.
Constaniana wrote:Ah, so you were dropped on your head. This explains a lot.
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:Snarky bastard.
The Grey Wolf wrote:You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.
Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:I'm not sure whether to laugh because thIs is the best satire I've ever seen or be very very afraid because someone actually thinks all this so.... have a cookie?
John Holland wrote: John Holland

by Solaray » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:06 pm

by Arcturus Novus » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:08 pm

by Mavorpen » Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:05 pm
Finland SSR wrote:First, no.
Second, even plants have feelings and thoughts too. What, is chopping a tree for woo the same as murder?

by Arumdaum » Wed Jun 25, 2014 2:11 am

by GraySoap » Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:14 am


by Socialist Czechia » Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:26 am
Lavan Tiri wrote:Finland SSR wrote:First, no.
Second, even plants have feelings and thoughts too. What, is chopping a tree for wool the same as murder?
They do? How does one find out if trees have feelings? Physiological analysis....of an organism with no capacity to communicate(as far as I know), or by setting it on fire see if it cries?
Although plants are immobile and are generally not recognized as sentient organisms, it has recently been proposed that plants should not only be viewed as organisms capable of exhibiting a form of basic intelligence, but also that plants possess tissues which are responsible for coordinating these intelligent responses (Trewavas, 2005). Furthermore, not only are action potentials accepted to occur in plants, but also recent studies have indicated that a form of synapse is also present in plants (Baluška et al., 2004; Baluška et al., 2005). These plant synapses, which function in a similar manner to the synapses which occur between neurons in animals, involve the plant hormone auxin which is thought to function as a neurotransmitter-like molecule (Baluška et al., 2004; Baluška et al., 2005). Drawing upon these findings, a number of researchers have also argued that the root apex, and more specifically cells of the transition zone between dividing and elongating cells at the root apex, could be considered a ‘brain-like’ tissue, while the plant vascular system could be considered an analogue to the nerves found in animals (Baluška et al., 2004). In my presentation, I will discuss why plants may be considered intelligent organisms, discuss why action potentials and synapses are thought to be present in plants, and ultimately describe the “brain-like” tissues of plants and why it is thought by some researchers that this new field of ‘plant neurobiology’ provides for unique and alternative insight into how plants function.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

by GraySoap » Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:29 am

by Baghanathria » Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:33 am

by Hurdegaryp » Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:52 am
Baghanathria wrote:Is killing pigs for food the same as murdering children?
Of course not, Mister Original Poster. Piggies are delicious, human children are not.
Jaggly-jiggly-daandy-doo, now that was an isteresting debate, who wants a beer, I'm paying.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Baghanathria » Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:54 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:Baghanathria wrote:Is killing pigs for food the same as murdering children?
Of course not, Mister Original Poster. Piggies are delicious, human children are not.
Jaggly-jiggly-daandy-doo, now that was an isteresting debate, who wants a beer, I'm paying.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: you cannot know for sure that pigs are more delectable than human children until you test that hypothesis.

by Carbon based lifeforms » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:03 am

by Baghanathria » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:04 am

by Hurdegaryp » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:04 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Baghanathria » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:09 am

by Zottistan » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:11 am
Finland SSR wrote:First, no.
Second, even plants have feelings and thoughts too. What, is chopping a tree for woo the same as murder?

by Carbon based lifeforms » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:12 am
Baghanathria wrote:I hated vegetables back then, so I served myself with mayonnaise, ketchup, and some freedom fries.

by Baghanathria » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:15 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cawn, Greater Britannian Realm, Herargon, IZERN, Kewelsburg, Plandistria, Saorysa, The Huskar Social Union, Tinhampton, Vrindi
Advertisement