Normlpeople wrote:"Clause 5, regarding security cameras, requires change in my opinion. It can often be some time between the act of committing a crime and the investigation of it. This part places some rather difficult decisions on the ones operating the cameras to state rather the act is consensual or not, and could result in the loss of valuable evidence in a criminal investigation.
Obviously our intent is not to criminalize the recording of such acts on security cameras, but at the same time we don't want security footage distributed or sold if it contains child pornography. This clause is already a bit wordy; will try to pretty it up for the next draft. (OOC: suggestions on wording this clause are welcome.)
I would also say mild, since it only applies internationally, and doesn't restrict the practice within a nation itself."
Well, yes it does ("BANS the production of child pornography in all member nations"), although unreasonable nations can get around that by setting the age of consent/age of majority to zero. If that's what they really want, that gets them out of not just this but GAR#222, child labor laws, etc., but this still won't allow them to export it to any nation where the performers haven't reached the age of consent in the importing nation.