Is there a reason for this threadjacking?
Advertisement
by Neutraligon » Sat May 31, 2014 3:21 pm
by Murkwood » Sat May 31, 2014 3:22 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Murkwood » Sat May 31, 2014 3:24 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Neutraligon » Sat May 31, 2014 3:26 pm
by Llamalandia » Sat May 31, 2014 3:30 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Uh no they don't have to agree to it. If you refuse to leave the hospital, they may let you stay for a few minutes or a few hours but at some point they're either going to put you in a chair and wheel you outside, or if fight them they'll call security and have them force in you a chair and wheel you out. Either way you're leaving the hospital in a wheel chair if that's what they so mandate. You don't get a choice.
Thus it was fine what the guard did up until he violently reacted to martinez who (inappropriately tried to slap his hand away.)
Still like I said you cant just handcuff the kid, especially given that he really couldn't stop the guard from wheeling him anywhere. I mean, if the kid tries to slap you fine, report it to his teacher to write up when you get him to class, but handcuffing and beating him was clearly not just wrong but felonious.
Ye they have to agree to it. They may force you to leave at some point, but that is normally when security has been called, at which point it is a very different scenario. More then that there is a difference between the situation mentioned above, and the situation in the school. Again you are not allowed to grab the kid and drag them to the classroom. Similarly you should not be allowed to grab a wheelchair and push the kid to the classroom. Both are a form of assault. The only time an officer should be allowed to gab a kid in school is if the student is a danger to others, or deliberately disobeying orders, and in the case of the second, that is still questionable.
by The UK in Exile » Sat May 31, 2014 3:31 pm
by Llamalandia » Sat May 31, 2014 3:32 pm
by Neutraligon » Sat May 31, 2014 3:33 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Ye they have to agree to it. They may force you to leave at some point, but that is normally when security has been called, at which point it is a very different scenario. More then that there is a difference between the situation mentioned above, and the situation in the school. Again you are not allowed to grab the kid and drag them to the classroom. Similarly you should not be allowed to grab a wheelchair and push the kid to the classroom. Both are a form of assault. The only time an officer should be allowed to gab a kid in school is if the student is a danger to others, or deliberately disobeying orders, and in the case of the second, that is still questionable.
Yeah, and in that case security could force your ass down into a wheel chair and if necessary cuff you to it and wheel you out. Plus you are allowed to grab a kid and drag them into class, happened once or twice at my school, though given it was private they generally can get away with it under the doctrine of "private schools doing whatever the hell they want anyway".
No you can drag non-disabled kids to class, thus you should be able to drag (or rather aprropriately wheel in this case) a disabled student to class.
Though I should point out that the student (martinez) alleges that the guard had beaten earlier off camera on the elevator ride to the 2nd? floor, so this was before? the kid even objected to being wheeled to class. If that's the case then this is even worse and the guard is arguably a slightly worse person as he wouldn't have even been reacting to a slight provocation.
by Molsonian Republics » Sat May 31, 2014 3:34 pm
OOCRepublican Party (US), Catholicism, United States, democracy, Pro-life Movement, capitalism, gun rights, Putin's domestic policy.Abortion, gay "marriage", liberalism, Barack Obama, racism, Democratic Party, communism, socialism, Obamacare, secularism, non-Christians, Putin's foreign policy.Rob Astorino for NY Governor"The politically correct crowd is tolerant of all viewpoints, except those they disagree with." - Bobby Jindal
"Where there is no Jesus, evil always reigns." - Phil Robertson
IC
My nations wiki page
Embassy Program
Proud Member of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM ALLIANCE!
Proud Member of the Right Wing Christian Liberty Alliance!
IATA Member
by Geilinor » Sat May 31, 2014 3:34 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Ye they have to agree to it. They may force you to leave at some point, but that is normally when security has been called, at which point it is a very different scenario. More then that there is a difference between the situation mentioned above, and the situation in the school. Again you are not allowed to grab the kid and drag them to the classroom. Similarly you should not be allowed to grab a wheelchair and push the kid to the classroom. Both are a form of assault. The only time an officer should be allowed to gab a kid in school is if the student is a danger to others, or deliberately disobeying orders, and in the case of the second, that is still questionable.
Yeah, and in that case security could force your ass down into a wheel chair and if necessary cuff you to it and wheel you out. Plus you are allowed to grab a kid and drag them into class, happened once or twice at my school, though given it was private they generally can get away with it under the doctrine of "private schools doing whatever the hell they want anyway".
No you can drag non-disabled kids to class, thus you should be able to drag (or rather aprropriately wheel in this case) a disabled student to class.
by Llamalandia » Sat May 31, 2014 3:38 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Yeah, and in that case security could force your ass down into a wheel chair and if necessary cuff you to it and wheel you out. Plus you are allowed to grab a kid and drag them into class, happened once or twice at my school, though given it was private they generally can get away with it under the doctrine of "private schools doing whatever the hell they want anyway".
No you can drag non-disabled kids to class, thus you should be able to drag (or rather aprropriately wheel in this case) a disabled student to class.
Though I should point out that the student (martinez) alleges that the guard had beaten earlier off camera on the elevator ride to the 2nd? floor, so this was before? the kid even objected to being wheeled to class. If that's the case then this is even worse and the guard is arguably a slightly worse person as he wouldn't have even been reacting to a slight provocation.
I have never seen a student dragged in any of my schools. Once the security has arrived again different scenario. Personally any guard that touched me in hat manner would be sued. If that happened in your school, and no one complained about it, then that is a problem at your school.
by Llamalandia » Sat May 31, 2014 3:41 pm
Geilinor wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Yeah, and in that case security could force your ass down into a wheel chair and if necessary cuff you to it and wheel you out. Plus you are allowed to grab a kid and drag them into class, happened once or twice at my school, though given it was private they generally can get away with it under the doctrine of "private schools doing whatever the hell they want anyway".
No you can drag non-disabled kids to class, thus you should be able to drag (or rather aprropriately wheel in this case) a disabled student to class.
"Once or twice" is not an excuse. I don't know what school you go to, but it sounds like another one of the failing schools you gave us as an example. The guard's reaction was very disproportional. The guard could have contacted the school administration to have a talk with the student and use disciplinary action if necessary.
by Geilinor » Sat May 31, 2014 3:41 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
I have never seen a student dragged in any of my schools. Once the security has arrived again different scenario. Personally any guard that touched me in hat manner would be sued. If that happened in your school, and no one complained about it, then that is a problem at your school.
Well, no complained because of course had they done so, they would have been expelled, and it is a very good school.
by Murkwood » Sat May 31, 2014 3:43 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Llamalandia » Sat May 31, 2014 3:43 pm
by Heco » Sat May 31, 2014 3:44 pm
by Geilinor » Sat May 31, 2014 3:44 pm
Heco wrote:just beat the security guard and put the kid down.
by Murkwood » Sat May 31, 2014 3:46 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Llamalandia » Sat May 31, 2014 3:51 pm
by The divided » Sat May 31, 2014 4:23 pm
by Murkwood » Sat May 31, 2014 4:26 pm
The divided wrote:I've been reading some of the responses about *gasp* trigger warning.
PTSD is serious. If it saved one person from a flashback, then I don't really care how many of you were annoyed by it.
I have never experienced PTSD, my first thoughts when someone mentions a mental illness that I have not known is to generally roll my eyes, however, after becoming slightly less ignorant and more aware, I don't see the harm in announcing a potential trigger warning with a few more words of text. If that seriously bothers you, please, get a life.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by The divided » Sat May 31, 2014 4:27 pm
Murkwood wrote:The divided wrote:I've been reading some of the responses about *gasp* trigger warning.
PTSD is serious. If it saved one person from a flashback, then I don't really care how many of you were annoyed by it.
I have never experienced PTSD, my first thoughts when someone mentions a mental illness that I have not known is to generally roll my eyes, however, after becoming slightly less ignorant and more aware, I don't see the harm in announcing a potential trigger warning with a few more words of text. If that seriously bothers you, please, get a life.
I think "Security guard beats student in wheelchair" is enough of a warning of the content as it is.
by Boomhaueristan » Sat May 31, 2014 4:28 pm
by Llamalandia » Sat May 31, 2014 4:28 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Franovia, Homalia, Ineva, La Xinga, Likhinia, Neanderthaland, Neo-Hermitius, Neu California, Nivosea, Panagouge, Polanas, Port Carverton, Saiwana, San Lumen, Shrillland, Tiami
Advertisement