by Unibot III » Thu May 29, 2014 7:57 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Unibot III » Thu May 29, 2014 8:11 pm
Har veyzz wrote:Why did TRR move a little to the right?
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Mallorea and Riva » Thu May 29, 2014 8:17 pm
by Unibot III » Thu May 29, 2014 8:18 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by South Pacific Belschaft » Thu May 29, 2014 8:20 pm
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
by Mallorea and Riva » Thu May 29, 2014 8:21 pm
quiet you!South Pacific Belschaft wrote:Ignoring of course that the vast majority of GCR politicians Uni is labeling as raider leaning or raiders are actually Independents who reject the R/D duopoly entirely.
by PrussianEmpire » Thu May 29, 2014 8:42 pm
—« The PrussianEmpire From The East Pacific »—
by Todd McCloud » Thu May 29, 2014 8:43 pm
South Pacific Belschaft wrote:Ignoring of course that the vast majority of GCR politicians Uni is labeling as raider leaning or raiders are actually Independents who reject the R/D duopoly entirely.
by Unibot III » Thu May 29, 2014 8:45 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by South Pacific Belschaft » Thu May 29, 2014 9:18 pm
Todd McCloud wrote:South Pacific Belschaft wrote:Ignoring of course that the vast majority of GCR politicians Uni is labeling as raider leaning or raiders are actually Independents who reject the R/D duopoly entirely.
How can one be independent or apathetic when they are immersed in gameplay? I've wondered this for a while now, but I posit that enough exposure in gameplay will give someone a lean one way or another. This "lean" is indicative of the experiences and contemporaries the individual has, IMO.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
by Jeffersonborg » Thu May 29, 2014 9:55 pm
by The Grim Reaper » Thu May 29, 2014 11:16 pm
Jeffersonborg wrote:The test places you as R or D based on assumptions that you feel strongly for/against certain statements in the quiz.
Therefore you *are* R or D based on the definition of the quiz. I suppose it has already done (can't be bothered to shift though the drama), but the only to show it's "wrong' is to explain how you can agree with statements x y and z in the quiz but not the R or D it concludes you are.
by Zaolat » Fri May 30, 2014 12:09 am
Neragua wrote:I get the R/D alignment but regionalist/cosmopolitan? What's the difference there?
by Neragua » Fri May 30, 2014 12:56 am
Zaolat wrote:Neragua wrote:I get the R/D alignment but regionalist/cosmopolitan? What's the difference there?
The former tends to stick strictly to it's own region or at least a very few. Loyalty to those regions are stronger, since their time is not as spread out. The latter gets involved in multiple places, loyalty can be strong for a few of those regions, but it's very difficult to be entirely loyal without conflicts of interests.
by Unibot III » Fri May 30, 2014 4:23 am
Zaolat wrote:Neragua wrote:I get the R/D alignment but regionalist/cosmopolitan? What's the difference there?
The former tends to stick strictly to it's own region or at least a very few. Loyalty to those regions are stronger, since their time is not as spread out. The latter gets involved in multiple places, loyalty can be strong for a few of those regions, but it's very difficult to be entirely loyal without conflicts of interests.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by LRI Recruiter » Fri May 30, 2014 4:51 am
by Punk Daddy » Fri May 30, 2014 4:52 am
by Goddess Relief Office » Fri May 30, 2014 4:53 am
by Benevolent Thomas » Fri May 30, 2014 7:33 am
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Venico » Fri May 30, 2014 8:26 am
by The Sapientia » Fri May 30, 2014 9:03 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement