NATION

PASSWORD

Emily Letts abortion video

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63261
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 09, 2014 4:38 pm

Pilotto wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Quite a lot. From the circulation system alone, birth physiologically changes the organism substantially.

Right. And how exactly does this affect the fetus/infant's right to life?

What ever gave you the implication that I was making a comment on that? You seemed confused on what basis an infant is distinguished from a fetus. I clarified it for you.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Deadora
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Jun 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Deadora » Fri May 09, 2014 4:38 pm

Murkwood wrote:Killing a child is never the way to go*. If you don't want it, give birth and put it up for adoption.

*Unless it's incest, rape, or the mothers life is in danger.

"Abortion is murder and it's wrong!

. . . Unless reasons x, y, z."

You can't be moderate on murder. People like you are what allowed it to be legalized in the first place. Sick.
Strategy is the art of creating power.


User avatar
The Re-Frisivisiaing
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1400
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Re-Frisivisiaing » Fri May 09, 2014 4:41 pm

Deadora wrote:
Murkwood wrote:Killing a child is never the way to go*. If you don't want it, give birth and put it up for adoption.

*Unless it's incest, rape, or the mothers life is in danger.

"Abortion is murder and it's wrong!

. . . Unless reasons x, y, z."

You can't be moderate on murder. People like you are what allowed it to be legalized in the first place. Sick.

Gotta be consistent with your hatred of women, amirite?
Yes, yes, I'm the Impeach, Ban, Legalize 2017 guy. Stop running my thing into the ground. It eats my life-force.

Frisivisia, justly deleted, 4/14/14.

User avatar
Deadora
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Jun 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Deadora » Fri May 09, 2014 4:43 pm

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:
Deadora wrote:"Abortion is murder and it's wrong!

. . . Unless reasons x, y, z."

You can't be moderate on murder. People like you are what allowed it to be legalized in the first place. Sick.

Gotta be consistent with your hatred of women, amirite?
People who murder deserve to be hated.
Strategy is the art of creating power.


User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2345
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 4:43 pm

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:
Deadora wrote:"Abortion is murder and it's wrong!

. . . Unless reasons x, y, z."

You can't be moderate on murder. People like you are what allowed it to be legalized in the first place. Sick.

Gotta be consistent with your hatred of women, amirite?

Oh yes. How did you know? Protecting the defenseless? That's not what we care about at all! No, we oppose abortion because we hate women!
I can't believe it took you so long to catch on.

User avatar
The Re-Frisivisiaing
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1400
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Re-Frisivisiaing » Fri May 09, 2014 4:46 pm

Pilotto wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Gotta be consistent with your hatred of women, amirite?

Oh yes. How did you know? Protecting the defenseless? That's not what we care about at all! No, we oppose abortion because we hate women!
I can't believe it took you so long to catch on.

I dunno, it has to take some sort of hatred of women to believe that they, unlike men, can and should be told what they can and can't do with their own bodies.

Also, I like "protecting the defenseless". That's a quality bit of bullshit, it makes oppressing women sound so much fairer.
Yes, yes, I'm the Impeach, Ban, Legalize 2017 guy. Stop running my thing into the ground. It eats my life-force.

Frisivisia, justly deleted, 4/14/14.

User avatar
The Re-Frisivisiaing
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1400
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Re-Frisivisiaing » Fri May 09, 2014 4:47 pm

Deadora wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Gotta be consistent with your hatred of women, amirite?
People who murder deserve to be hated.

It's not murder if it's legal and not all women have abortions, but you seem to harbor a hatred for all of them. This seems unfair to me.
Yes, yes, I'm the Impeach, Ban, Legalize 2017 guy. Stop running my thing into the ground. It eats my life-force.

Frisivisia, justly deleted, 4/14/14.

User avatar
Czervenika
Minister
 
Posts: 2381
Founded: Jul 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Czervenika » Fri May 09, 2014 4:47 pm

I thought it was excellent actually. It serves to show other women that abortion doesn't has to be scary. And before anybody brings it up, screw off men who want to tell me what I can and can't do with my womb.
(Ignore Factbook for now. It is being redone...eventually.)

Gender: Cis female
Nationality: Canadian
Ethnicity: Slavic
Religion: Islam
Politics: Titoism

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2345
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 4:50 pm

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:
Pilotto wrote:Oh yes. How did you know? Protecting the defenseless? That's not what we care about at all! No, we oppose abortion because we hate women!
I can't believe it took you so long to catch on.

I dunno, it has to take some sort of hatred of women to believe that they, unlike men, can and should be told what they can and can't do with their own bodies.

Also, I like "protecting the defenseless". That's a quality bit of bullshit, it makes oppressing women sound so much fairer.

I don't want to tell women what they can and cannot do with their bodies. Just that the cannot murder their unborn children.

User avatar
The Re-Frisivisiaing
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1400
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Re-Frisivisiaing » Fri May 09, 2014 4:55 pm

Pilotto wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:I dunno, it has to take some sort of hatred of women to believe that they, unlike men, can and should be told what they can and can't do with their own bodies.

Also, I like "protecting the defenseless". That's a quality bit of bullshit, it makes oppressing women sound so much fairer.

I don't want to tell women what they can and cannot do with their bodies. Just that the cannot murder their unborn children.

Nope. You want to tell women that they must consent to pregnancy each and every time they have sex. You want to tell women that they ought to have less choice in whether they are forced to bring to term, birth, and take care of a child than a man does. You cannot support abortion without carrying the implications that you think women should have and therefore deserve fewer rights than men.

Fetuses, "unborn children" as you call them so that they sound sweet and defenseless, a tool you use to sneak in the back door of people's minds to make them hate women just as much as you do, are not people, and do not and should not have rights. You do not have the right to use someone else's body, as fetuses do. It is therefore not out of the question to forcibly evict you.
Yes, yes, I'm the Impeach, Ban, Legalize 2017 guy. Stop running my thing into the ground. It eats my life-force.

Frisivisia, justly deleted, 4/14/14.

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Fri May 09, 2014 5:02 pm

Camicon wrote:
The Flood wrote:You're opinion will never be right, no matter how many times you say it, no matter what argument you make. Abortion will be murder until the stars burn out, and the universe grows cold.Well pro-choice offends me. Pro-murder, pro-slaughter, pro-death, are all much more accurate terms. The pro-choice stance fundamentally shows a lack of respect or concern for human life. I hate the term pro-choice, because it's sugarcoated, it by it's very nature tries to hide its true meaning, of killing innocent children for no justifiable reason.

You bet I hold the preservation of human life as the most fundamental value.

And practically nobody thinks abortion should be denied even if the woman and the baby will both die otherwise, only a minority of fanatics thinks that.

Your opinion will never be right, no matter how many times you say it, no matter what argument you make. Abortion is not murder.

Pro-choice Pro-life offends me. Pro-murder, pro-slaughter, pro-death, are all much more accurate terms. The pro-choice pro-life stance fundamentally shows a lack of respect or concern for human life. I hate the term pro-choice pro-life, because it's sugarcoated, it by it's very nature tries to hide its true meaning, of killing innocent children women (and violating their bodily sovereignty) for no justifiable reason.
Congratulations on modifying a post in such a way that literally makes no sense at all!

Here is your gold star.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2345
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 5:03 pm

[redacted]
Last edited by Pilotto on Fri May 09, 2014 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Fri May 09, 2014 5:03 pm

Czervenika wrote:I thought it was excellent actually. It serves to show other women that abortion doesn't has to be scary. And before anybody brings it up, screw off men who want to tell me what I can and can't do with my womb.

I'm sorry, this is not part of the thread.

However, how can you support Russia and LGBTQA rights? They're like antonyms.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2345
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 5:03 pm

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:
Pilotto wrote:I don't want to tell women what they can and cannot do with their bodies. Just that the cannot murder their unborn children.

Nope. You want to tell women that they must consent to pregnancy each and every time they have sex.

I'm sorry, do the words "birth control" mean anything to you?

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:You want to tell women that they ought to have less choice in whether they are forced to bring to term, birth, and take care of a child than a man does. You cannot support abortion without carrying the implications that you think women should have and therefore deserve fewer rights than men.

Wrong. I think that the unborn should be afforded the same basic right to life that everyone else is.

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Fetuses, "unborn children" as you call them so that they sound sweet and defenseless, a tool you use to sneak in the back door of people's minds to make them hate women just as much as you do, are not people, and do not and should not have rights. You do not have the right to use someone else's body, as fetuses do. It is therefore not out of the question to forcibly evict you.

Really? Did the fetus ask to be conceived? Does it remain in it's mother's body by choice? And what evidence do you have to suggest that fetus' do not have any rights? Does a newborn baby not have rights? If it is acceptable to murder a fetus moments before exiting the womb, what precisely is the difference between that and murdering it moments later?
Last edited by Pilotto on Fri May 09, 2014 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Fri May 09, 2014 5:04 pm

Pilotto wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Nope. You want to tell women that they must consent to pregnancy each and every time they have sex.

I'm sorry, do the words "birth control" mean anything to you?

The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:You want to tell women that they ought to have less choice in whether they are forced to bring to term, birth, and take care of a child than a man does. You cannot support abortion without carrying the implications that you think women should have and therefore deserve fewer rights than men.[/quotes]
Wrong. I think that the unborn should be afforded the same basic right to life that everyone else is.


Really? Did the fetus ask to be conceived? Does it remain in it's mother's body by choice? And what evidence do you have to suggest that fetus' do not have any rights? Does a newborn baby not have rights? If it is acceptable to murder a fetus moments before exiting the womb, what precisely is the difference between that and murdering it moments later?

I'm sorry, do the words "birth control is not fucking perfect" mean anything to you?

No, it doesn't remain in the mother's body by choice. However, that does not mean that it can be a parasite in her without her consent.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Fri May 09, 2014 5:07 pm

Kelinfort wrote:Nuclear Fist put it best:
Regarding the banning of abortion. Here's the thing about banning abortion, it rarely stops abortions. In general, women will have abortions regardless of its legality.
Take Ceausescu's Romania, for example. In order to bolster population, Nicolae Ceausescu made abortion illegal under almost all circumstances with Decree 770. Contraceptives disappeared, hospitals were watched closely by the Securitate, and women found to be pregnant were spied on by the Securitate until the birth was confirmed.
The idea of 'pro-choice' and 'pro-life' is hogwash. What it boils down to is whether you want only the rich to be able to have them performed in sterile, clean environments where they are likely to survive or every woman being afford to have them performed in sterile, clean environments where they are likely to survive. The garb of the 'pro-life' moral crusader, when cast aside, leaves only naked hatred of female bodily autonomy and a bizarre, repugnant worship of fetuses.
To say that the pro-life hate women is offensive and factually incorrect.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Fri May 09, 2014 5:09 pm

The Flood wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Nuclear Fist put it best:
To say that the pro-life hate women is offensive and factually incorrect.

Considering that most pro-life politicians are for reducing women rights, I am pretty sure that pro-life people hate women.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Shaggai
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9339
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shaggai » Fri May 09, 2014 5:15 pm

The Flood wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Nuclear Fist put it best:
To say that the pro-life hate women is offensive and factually incorrect.

Do you support mandatory blood, bone marrow, and kidney donations for all adults? Because if you truly value life over bodily sovereignty, it's the only moral choice. If you don't support it, then you only support bodily sovereignty for people without uteruses. I think that "denying women rights that you allow men" does, in fact, fall under the heading of either "hates women" or "doesn't understand the issue".
piss

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60878
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Fri May 09, 2014 5:19 pm

Pilotto wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Nope. You want to tell women that they must consent to pregnancy each and every time they have sex.

I'm sorry, do the words "birth control" mean anything to you?

Birth control fails... and even then, no law says that consent to sex is consent to pregnancy, so you can take that bullshit argument elsewhere.

Pilotto wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:You want to tell women that they ought to have less choice in whether they are forced to bring to term, birth, and take care of a child than a man does. You cannot support abortion without carrying the implications that you think women should have and therefore deserve fewer rights than men.

Wrong. I think that the unborn should be afforded the same basic right to life that everyone else is.

No, you think that fetuses should have the right to live off somebody else's body, endangering their physical and mental health, without the host's consent.

I'm sorry, but being a potentially lethal parasite is not a human right.

Pilotto wrote:
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Fetuses, "unborn children" as you call them so that they sound sweet and defenseless, a tool you use to sneak in the back door of people's minds to make them hate women just as much as you do, are not people, and do not and should not have rights. You do not have the right to use someone else's body, as fetuses do. It is therefore not out of the question to forcibly evict you.

Really? Did the fetus ask to be conceived?

Given that the fetus is not sapient, the only ones who could possibly consent to anything in its place, if it were a person, would be its legal guardians.

Pilotto wrote:Does it remain in it's mother's body by choice?

Doesn't matter if it's not purposefully endangering its host's body. Lack of awareness doesn't entitle you to infringe upon somebody else's human rights, including physical integrity.

Pilotto wrote:And what evidence do you have to suggest that fetus' do not have any rights?

Several nations' laws not recognizing them as people, thus not entitling them to any human rights, for one.

Pilotto wrote:Does a newborn baby not have rights?

Yes, because it has already been born and can be considered a person.

Pilotto wrote:If it is acceptable to murder a fetus moments before exiting the womb, what precisely is the difference between that and murdering it moments later?

Birth.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60878
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Fri May 09, 2014 5:19 pm

The Flood wrote:
Camicon wrote:Your opinion will never be right, no matter how many times you say it, no matter what argument you make. Abortion is not murder.

Pro-choice Pro-life offends me. Pro-murder, pro-slaughter, pro-death, are all much more accurate terms. The pro-choice pro-life stance fundamentally shows a lack of respect or concern for human life. I hate the term pro-choice pro-life, because it's sugarcoated, it by it's very nature tries to hide its true meaning, of killing innocent children women (and violating their bodily sovereignty) for no justifiable reason.
Congratulations on modifying a post in such a way that literally makes no sense at all!

Here is your gold star.

You know, I'm waiting for you to acknowledge my response.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60878
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Fri May 09, 2014 5:21 pm

The Flood wrote:To say that the pro-life hate women is offensive and factually incorrect.

Offensive? Good.
Factually incorrect? I take it you can substantiate that claim. Perhaps by showing that you hold all human beings to the same standards, when it comes to parasitic creatures with human DNA needing a human host to survive, regardless of the host's consent.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16393
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Fri May 09, 2014 5:24 pm

The Flood wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Nuclear Fist put it best:
To say that the pro-life hate women is offensive and factually incorrect.

The second part I don't necessarily agree with, but c'mon, the pro lifers make it seem as though that all and most abortions would disappear if it were illega. That simply isn't the case.

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2345
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 5:28 pm

Liriena wrote:
Pilotto wrote:I'm sorry, do the words "birth control" mean anything to you?

Birth control fails... and even then, no law says that consent to sex is consent to pregnancy, so you can take that bullshit argument elsewhere.

Pilotto wrote:Wrong. I think that the unborn should be afforded the same basic right to life that everyone else is.

No, you think that fetuses should have the right to live off somebody else's body, endangering their physical and mental health, without the host's consent.

I'm sorry, but being a potentially lethal parasite is not a human right.

Pilotto wrote:Really? Did the fetus ask to be conceived?

Given that the fetus is not sapient, the only ones who could possibly consent to anything in its place, if it were a person, would be its legal guardians.

Pilotto wrote:Does it remain in it's mother's body by choice?

Doesn't matter if it's not purposefully endangering its host's body. Lack of awareness doesn't entitle you to infringe upon somebody else's human rights, including physical integrity.

Pilotto wrote:And what evidence do you have to suggest that fetus' do not have any rights?

Several nations' laws not recognizing them as people, thus not entitling them to any human rights, for one.

Pilotto wrote:Does a newborn baby not have rights?

Yes, because it has already been born and can be considered a person.

Pilotto wrote:If it is acceptable to murder a fetus moments before exiting the womb, what precisely is the difference between that and murdering it moments later?

Birth.

Birth. How exactly does the act of birth bestow the right to life? Please, explain.

User avatar
Czervenika
Minister
 
Posts: 2381
Founded: Jul 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Czervenika » Fri May 09, 2014 5:30 pm

Lamaredia wrote:
Czervenika wrote:I thought it was excellent actually. It serves to show other women that abortion doesn't has to be scary. And before anybody brings it up, screw off men who want to tell me what I can and can't do with my womb.

I'm sorry, this is not part of the thread.

However, how can you support Russia and LGBTQA rights? They're like antonyms.


How can you support Ukraine when their factions are burning people alive and such?
(Ignore Factbook for now. It is being redone...eventually.)

Gender: Cis female
Nationality: Canadian
Ethnicity: Slavic
Religion: Islam
Politics: Titoism

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2345
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 5:31 pm

Czervenika wrote:
Lamaredia wrote:I'm sorry, this is not part of the thread.

However, how can you support Russia and LGBTQA rights? They're like antonyms.

How can you support Ukraine when their factions are burning people alive and such?

Burning people alive...
Gotta source for that? One that's not RT?
Last edited by Pilotto on Fri May 09, 2014 5:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Camtropia, Dumb Ideologies, Duvniask, Eahland, Empress Jolthena Pamlia, Greater Guantanamo, Hayfielda, Ineva, Kurgao, Marenmia-Ocasia, Orcuo, Ostroeuropa, Shrillland, Sycozet Productions Incorporated, The Champions League, The Huskar Social Union, Unogonduria, Valrifell, Zamirskoje

Advertisement

Remove ads