Advertisement
by Tribes Republic » Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:06 pm
by The Dark Star Republic » Tue Mar 04, 2014 12:16 pm
by Elke and Elba » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:19 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:OOC: I'm wondering about the category on this one. This was drafted before the Health category existed, but most of the funding demands of this proposal are health-related.
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Ratateague » Thu Mar 06, 2014 3:22 pm
by Elke and Elba » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:11 am
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by The Dark Star Republic » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:11 am
Ratateague wrote:I would think that Health -> International Aid would be a more fitting category, since the aim of this bill is to improve the health of the people. As it is directing funds to developing/unequal nations and providing a framework for their improvement, this falls under what I would commonly consider foreign aid, even if it does not have a specified recipient. Also, international aid is certainly related to social justice.
by Hakio » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:14 am
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Brilliant Equestria » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:19 am
by Elke and Elba » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:21 am
Hakio wrote:Why the hell is everyone voting against this?!
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Hakio » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:27 am
Votes For: 89: Creepoc Infinite (10), Nylonstein (4), Jingdood (3), Reformed Azure (3), and (69) individual WA member nations.
Votes Against: 720: McMasterdonia (488), Moronist Decisions (156), The Star of Jorj (14), Aawia (5), Jnania (4), Akin Trade Federations (2), and (51) individual WA member nations.
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:40 am
Hakio wrote:Votes For: 89: Creepoc Infinite (10), Nylonstein (4), Jingdood (3), Reformed Azure (3), and (69) individual WA member nations.
Votes Against: 720: McMasterdonia (488), Moronist Decisions (156), The Star of Jorj (14), Aawia (5), Jnania (4), Akin Trade Federations (2), and (51) individual WA member nations.
Once again large delegates reign in their power over us measly WA nations.
by Hakio » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:41 am
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Wrapper » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:41 am
Votes For: 89: Creepoc Infinite (10), Nylonstein (4), Jingdood (3), Reformed Azure (3), and (69) individual WA member nations.
Votes Against: 720: McMasterdonia (488), Moronist Decisions (156), The Star of Jorj (14), Aawia (5), Jnania (4), Akin Trade Federations (2), and (51) individual WA member nations.
by Norilova » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:27 am
by Bears Armed » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:47 am
Norilova wrote:The Republic of Norilova gladly votes YES to this proposal. It makes logical sense, and besides, unsanitary water and such makes our people very angry, and we would rather not have to force our riot police not to clean protester chunks off their boots.
by Sciongrad » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:18 pm
Bears Armed wrote:Norilova wrote:The Republic of Norilova gladly votes YES to this proposal. It makes logical sense, and besides, unsanitary water and such makes our people very angry, and we would rather not have to force our riot police not to clean protester chunks off their boots.
"You do realise that you could pass laws on the subject for yourselves, without needing a WA resolution telling you to do so, hrright?"
by Usocc » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:11 pm
by Chester Pearson » Mon Mar 10, 2014 5:23 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by The Eternal Kawaii » Mon Mar 10, 2014 5:28 pm
Bears Armed wrote:Norilova wrote:The Republic of Norilova gladly votes YES to this proposal. It makes logical sense, and besides, unsanitary water and such makes our people very angry, and we would rather not have to force our riot police not to clean protester chunks off their boots.
"You do realise that you could pass laws on the subject for yourselves, without needing a WA resolution telling you to do so, hrright?"
by Sciongrad » Mon Mar 10, 2014 5:37 pm
by Chester Pearson » Mon Mar 10, 2014 5:43 pm
Sciongrad wrote:Chester Pearson wrote:
Far too much WA micromanagement....
Your Excellency, with all due respect, do you even know what that means? Because the only clauses that mandate anything in this resolution are extremely vague and intentionally flexible. I, like many others, am not a fan of micromanaging, that it's not a word you can just throw around to explain resolutions you don't like.
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Tek Republic » Mon Mar 10, 2014 5:43 pm
by Sciongrad » Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:09 pm
Chester Pearson wrote:Sciongrad wrote:
Your Excellency, with all due respect, do you even know what that means? Because the only clauses that mandate anything in this resolution are extremely vague and intentionally flexible. I, like many others, am not a fan of micromanaging, that it's not a word you can just throw around to explain resolutions you don't like.
The WA telling us we have to build toilets is not excessive WA micromanagement? If it's not, please tell me what is then, because I would really like to know?
by Zercera » Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:33 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement