by The Yautja race » Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:51 pm
by Pythagosaurus » Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:53 pm
by Itinerate Tree Dweller » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:26 pm
by Jovian Empire » Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:29 am
by Markus Wolf » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:52 am
by Poree » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:16 pm
by Enn » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:32 pm
by Reploid Productions » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Poree wrote:While I understand the reasoning behind it, I still think it is foolish to maintain a hold on a name that was registered in 2006 (for example) and has not logged on sense. There has to be a point where we can assume a person is never coming back and to restrict a name forever just because we hope someday they may want to revive an old nation is silly IMO.
But I accept that it is what it is.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Sarzonia » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:40 pm
Poree wrote:While I understand the reasoning behind it, I still think it is foolish to maintain a hold on a name that was registered in 2006 (for example) and has not logged on sense.
by E Fluxembourg » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:43 pm
by Parthenon » Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:20 pm
by Poree » Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:18 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australia Post
Advertisement