ALMF wrote:Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:
What is wite? If you mean WHITE then yes even that photo looks white (tho tanned). Not that it means anything, everyone knows most forensic reconstructions are BS anyway. I remember when the CIA tried to 'reconstruct' Bin Laden to account for age and it wound up seriously pissing off some Spanish politician who looked identical. Then when they actually got him, he didn't look anything like that in any case.
And there is no difference. They are both objecting to Santa being a certain color because they are threatened by people who look different. Not exactly a helpful conversation in terms of healthy racial relations.
1) If we ignore FR we are left with regional characteristics (still deasnt in the 3rd century). For a 3rd century myra we lie between modern turkmens and namibians. That is between
and
2) Governor George Wallace didn't like any people who didn't look like him at University of Alabama. Conversely Thurgood Marshall didn't like that nobody like him was at Sumner Elementary. Wallace was a raciest Marshall was not. Similarly, Aisha Harris was concerned by an overwhelmingly white image; whereas, Megyn Kelly objected to a mix of representations.
Can you explain to me why Namibians are somehow native to Anatolia, which is 1000s km away from their traditional homeland?
Also you keep going on about Turkomen but fail to realize that there was no major migration from Central Asia for several more centuries.
Look at Anatolian Turks today. Look at Greeks. Look at Armenians. They are overwhelmingly lightskinned.
I've known many people from all three ethnic groups, even my grandmother is Greek!