There is a difference between using a derogatory word for a group and posting an argument that is offensive to that group. We don't allow people to describe groups as "trannies", "kikes", or most other offensive stereotypical terms, but we most certainly don't censor arguments that certain players find offensive, as long as they are presented politely.
It is the consensus opinion of site staff that offensive arguments should be debated, not suppressed.
And may I ask for a clarification of this ruling? I know that I'm certainly not an involved party, but I'd like to ask for a secondary look, seeing as the sentiment seems to go against the rules. According the OSRS,
Flaming wrote:Erudite slams while maintaining a veneer of politeness can also be considered flaming.
Trolling wrote:Trolling is defined as posts that are made with the aim of angering people.
Neither give free reign to offensive arguments and/or comments because the poster has a silver tongue, and they seem to specifically discourage that idea.
Furthermore, if we are allowed to make offensive statements so long as they're made politely, may I now go around saying that "All those of European descent are inherently tainted with sin and a bloodlust that has led to a detrimental effect on the world as well as the cultural literacy of all societies"?