Advertisement
by South Pacific Belschaft » Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:22 am
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
by McMasterdonia » Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:08 am
by Harmoneia » Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:23 am
McMasterdonia wrote:Frankly, I am sick and tired of hearing about this bloc nonsense. There have been attempts to make it so, including attempts by people to try and force my hand and bring sanctions against Lazarus because of recent events.
I have before said that I will not be supporting a bloc coalition against either body. TNP is not allied to Lazarus, nor are we allied with TNI. It strikes me as a bit strange that TNPs position has been outlined, when I have not outlined it in that way. Issues between TNI and Lazarus are their business, not ours. Likewise any issue between TNI and the NPO is not our business. The only issue I had was the accusations about Balder as a satellite state.
by Frattastan II » Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:42 am
McMasterdonia wrote:I have before said that I will not be supporting a bloc coalition against either body
Harmoneia wrote:To be honest, Lazarus couldn't care less about this so-called "Cold War."
<@Guy> well done, fuckhead.
* @Guy claps for frattastan
by Solorni » Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:47 am
by South Pacific Belschaft » Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:53 am
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
by Milograd » Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:59 am
by Cerian Quilor » Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:14 am
by Glen-Rhodes » Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:25 am
Milograd wrote:There isn't a cold war. TP pissed off some people, but to be honest, people will get over it eventually, since the NPO obviously isn't going anywhere and a long-term grudge would be unproductive for all involved parties.
by Unibot III » Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:50 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Libetarian Republics » Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:57 pm
Moreover, The Rejected Realms almost perfectly lay in sync with The Founderless Regions Alliance.
by Unibot III » Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:09 pm
Libetarian Republics wrote:An interesting perspective nevertheless
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Hobbesistan » Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:24 pm
by Nalt » Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:34 pm
Unibot III wrote:Libetarian Republics wrote:An interesting perspective nevertheless
It basically fits my world-view: A lump of major powers in the centre and the UDL and the NPO outside of the clump. Why such a stark contrast? After the fall of Defenderism in 2006, regions became more realist and less idealist -- regions focused solely on their "regional interests" (what others proscribe as "regional interests" and how to attain them), which produces a clump of regions which are more or less similar than they are different because they have the same goal and are using the same instructional manual.
The New Pacific Order is the remainder of this by-gone era, it possesses its own idealism (Francoism) -- which makes it uniquely different than the centralist powers.
In Paradise Found, I postulated that the realism of the centralist powers robs them of their differences and prevents them from cultivating a distinct external regional identity, which in turn produces a negative effect on their sense of purpose and regional activity.
by Hobbesistan » Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:51 pm
Solorni wrote:Glad we got the Donald Trump of NS back
Not sure how Balder is more raider than Osiris or part of an imperialist sphere of influence....
by A Unibotian Diplomat » Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:52 pm
Solorni wrote:Not sure how Balder is more raider than Osiris or part of an imperialist sphere of influence....
Hobbesistan wrote:This, i'd also consider TEP to be far closer to the middle line -- We raid about the same amount as we defend, then again, we arent true 'imperialist'.
by Solorni » Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:06 pm
Hobbesistan wrote:Solorni wrote:Glad we got the Donald Trump of NS back
Not sure how Balder is more raider than Osiris or part of an imperialist sphere of influence....
This, i'd also consider TEP to be far closer to the middle line -- We raid about the same amount as we defend, then again, we arent true 'imperialist'.
Furthermore, if you're not sure how Balder is a part of an imperialist sphere of influence, you really need to start reading your memos. Balder may or may not be a "satellite region" of imperialists, but imperialists most certainly possess a great deal of influence in Balder.
by A Unibotian Diplomat » Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:13 pm
Solorni wrote:Let's be real -once- Unibot. How?
Is this like how you thought Eluvatar was working with the imperialists to bring down your org from the inside?
by Cerian Quilor » Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:16 pm
by Solorni » Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:19 pm
A Unibotian Diplomat wrote:Solorni wrote:Let's be real -once- Unibot. How?
Membership ties of allegiance (both official and unofficial), a convergence of political culture, in addition to a strong but conventional foreign affairs presence. Whether your army raids or does not raid is a red herring -- imperialists wouldn't care if you raided or not.Is this like how you thought Eluvatar was working with the imperialists to bring down your org from the inside?
That's bonehead stupid. I don't know what you're talking about -- it was well known Eluvatar's relations with imperialists was very poor. This seems to be an obvious side-step to avoid the issue at hand while trying to discredit my theoretical analysis as the word of paranoia, yes? Alright then: you haven't changed a bit.
by NS Confidential » Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:20 pm
by NS Confidential » Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Akithec, Canton Empire
Advertisement