NATION

PASSWORD

Should the government interfere in the economy?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Eternal Yerushalayim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5087
Founded: Mar 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Should the government interfere in the economy?

Postby Eternal Yerushalayim » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:35 pm

Should the government interfere in the economy via regulation, bailouts etc? Why/Why not? Also, is a budget deficit or a budget surplus better for the nation as a whole? Cite some examples eg.lower tax rates, richer nation etc
Last edited by Eternal Yerushalayim on Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:23 am, edited 2 times in total.
"The trouble with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."-Margaret Thatcher
"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe. " -Saint Augustine
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."-Albert Einstein
"The first and simplest emotion which we discover in the human mind, is curiosity." -Edmund Burke

User avatar
Collective Systems (Ancient)
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1503
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Collective Systems (Ancient) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:41 pm

Despite popular belief, we'd be even more fucked if they didn't interfere somewhat.

User avatar
Soratsin
Diplomat
 
Posts: 976
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Soratsin » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:42 pm

Yes to interference, we had a period of zero interference, it resulted in bank runs, financial panic, and the great depression. That being said, if the economy is running smoothly then there is no purpose for government interference.

As for surplus/deficit thing, personally I'd prefer a controlled deficit, if the government is going to take money out of my paychecks they better be spending all of it, preferably on something that benefits me or the nation.
Earth saw clmate chnge4 ions;will cont 2 c chnges.R duty2responsbly devlop resorces4humankind/not pollute&destroy;but cant alter naturl chng
-Sarah Palin

User avatar
Eternal Yerushalayim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5087
Founded: Mar 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eternal Yerushalayim » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:44 pm

Collective Systems wrote:Despite popular belief, we'd be even more fucked if they didn't interfere somewhat.

Also, I have another question: Should companies be forced to pay the state back after they receive a bailout and recover?
Last edited by Eternal Yerushalayim on Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"The trouble with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."-Margaret Thatcher
"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe. " -Saint Augustine
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."-Albert Einstein
"The first and simplest emotion which we discover in the human mind, is curiosity." -Edmund Burke

User avatar
Collective Systems (Ancient)
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1503
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Collective Systems (Ancient) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:45 pm

Banks are just ways to keep the worker class suffering. I will not respond to that question.

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:45 pm

Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:
Collective Systems wrote:Despite popular belief, we'd be even more fucked if they didn't interfere somewhat.

Also, I have another question: Should banks be forced to pay the state back after they receive a bailout and recover?


Yes they should and with interest.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Eternal Yerushalayim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5087
Founded: Mar 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eternal Yerushalayim » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:46 pm

Soratsin wrote:Yes to interference, we had a period of zero interference, it resulted in bank runs, financial panic, and the great depression. That being said, if the economy is running smoothly then there is no purpose for government interference.

As for surplus/deficit thing, personally I'd prefer a controlled deficit, if the government is going to take money out of my paychecks they better be spending all of it, preferably on something that benefits me or the nation.

Well, if there's a surplus, would you prefer if they return it back to you?
"The trouble with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."-Margaret Thatcher
"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe. " -Saint Augustine
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."-Albert Einstein
"The first and simplest emotion which we discover in the human mind, is curiosity." -Edmund Burke

User avatar
Eternal Yerushalayim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5087
Founded: Mar 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eternal Yerushalayim » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:47 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:
Collective Systems wrote:Despite popular belief, we'd be even more fucked if they didn't interfere somewhat.

Also, I have another question: Should banks be forced to pay the state back after they receive a bailout and recover?


Yes they should and with interest.

So the bailout is in effect a loan?
"The trouble with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."-Margaret Thatcher
"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe. " -Saint Augustine
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."-Albert Einstein
"The first and simplest emotion which we discover in the human mind, is curiosity." -Edmund Burke

User avatar
Eternal Yerushalayim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5087
Founded: Mar 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eternal Yerushalayim » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:47 pm

Collective Systems wrote:Banks are just ways to keep the worker class suffering. I will not respond to that question.

What if it's a subsidy to the individual worker?
"The trouble with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."-Margaret Thatcher
"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe. " -Saint Augustine
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."-Albert Einstein
"The first and simplest emotion which we discover in the human mind, is curiosity." -Edmund Burke

User avatar
Parthenon
Senator
 
Posts: 3512
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Parthenon » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:47 pm

No.
The Parthenese Confederation
Parthenon
Intergallactic Hell
The Bleeding Roses
West Parthenon
Former GDODAD/Metus Member

User avatar
Hindopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 591
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hindopia » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:47 pm

Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:Should the government interfere in the economy via regulation, bailouts etc? Why/Why not? Also, is a budget deficit or a budget surplus better for the nation as a whole? Cite some examples eg.lower tax rates, richer nation etc

As long as we keep throwing money at them, they'll do fine.
Playing NationStates since November 27, 2009
Back after a long hiatus

User avatar
Eternal Yerushalayim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5087
Founded: Mar 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eternal Yerushalayim » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:48 pm

Parthenon wrote:No.

The deficit part?
"The trouble with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."-Margaret Thatcher
"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe. " -Saint Augustine
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."-Albert Einstein
"The first and simplest emotion which we discover in the human mind, is curiosity." -Edmund Burke

User avatar
Delator
Minister
 
Posts: 2224
Founded: Nov 29, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Delator » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:50 pm

Parthenon wrote:No.


I love how you can make this statement without a single shred of evidence.
Those that seek to place heel upon the throat of Liberty will fall to the cry of Freedom!

User avatar
Hindopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 591
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hindopia » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:50 pm

Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:
Parthenon wrote:No.

The deficit part?

I think he means that as an answer to "should the govt interfere in the economy".
Playing NationStates since November 27, 2009
Back after a long hiatus

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:50 pm

Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:
Collective Systems wrote:Despite popular belief, we'd be even more fucked if they didn't interfere somewhat.

Also, I have another question: Should banks be forced to pay the state back after they receive a bailout and recover?


Yes they should and with interest.

So the bailout is in effect a loan?


Either that or the American people get ownership shares and vote directly on how to control the banks with profits from dividends going directly to the people. .
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Collective Systems (Ancient)
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1503
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Collective Systems (Ancient) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:51 pm

He doesn't need evidence. That was an opinion.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19482
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:52 pm

business cannot regulate itself.

it's like trying to play football and findingnyourself in a constant rugger.

You need some rules and a referee, or the game breaks down.

Of course, there can also be over-officiating.

But I do like my sports analogy. A few wise rules, well enforced, make the game more enjoyable.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Former Principalities
Diplomat
 
Posts: 881
Founded: Jun 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Former Principalities » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:53 pm

The government should only intervene when a crisis calls for intervention, otherwise they should try to stay out as much as they can. The government should for the most part act as a regulatory body and reprimand those firms who don't play by the rules.

For example, if a company wants to lay down some infrastructure such as electricity cables, they'd get a quote, have their financiers negotiate with the cable suppliers etc, and generally get themselves a fair price. However if the government set up infrastructure like that they don't bother negotiating for fairer prices, and may not even get a quote, thus it could cost the government more money to set up the same infrastructure than would cost a company. Mind you this is small-scale stuff....

As for deficits vs. surpluses, both are good, depending on your viewpoint. A deficit is good because it encourages foreign borrowing and keeps capital flowing through an economy, though excessive borrowing is to be avoided. A surplus represents inflow of money into the economy, so that HAS to be good, as it represents more money received for exports, and can also lead to increased investment overseas.

That's my 2 cents anyway....
Last edited by Former Principalities on Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The UCCS
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Mar 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The UCCS » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:53 pm

If capitalism is to work, we need government interference. The Fed allowed a bubble to be created.
We're about to see a bubble pop with gold, by the way.
Economic Left/Right: -9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.97

User avatar
Parthenon
Senator
 
Posts: 3512
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Parthenon » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:54 pm

The economy has rules...

Supply and Demand
The Parthenese Confederation
Parthenon
Intergallactic Hell
The Bleeding Roses
West Parthenon
Former GDODAD/Metus Member

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:54 pm

The UCCS wrote:If capitalism is to work, we need government interference. The Fed allowed a bubble to be created.
We're about to see a bubble pop with gold, by the way.


You feel gold is going to go down greatly? That would be really funny to watch.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
The Parthians
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1058
Founded: Jan 14, 2004
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby The Parthians » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:54 pm

No. See Road to Serfdom.
"And as you approach Parthia's prisons..."What's that buzzing noise, a factory?"
"No, that's all the carrion flies near the prison."
-New Edom

Because profit is more important than morality, obviously.

User avatar
The UCCS
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Mar 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The UCCS » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:54 pm

Parthenon wrote:The economy has rules...

Supply and Demand


The rules are theoretical, wait what? What does supply and demand have to do with anything?
Economic Left/Right: -9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.97

User avatar
Regillus (Ancient)
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Mar 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Regillus (Ancient) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:55 pm

no, business should be allowed to fail and go bankrupt. The fact that Bush saved those big corporations is a sign that government only cares about the big businesses. Is it fair that the government takes money from taxpayers to save a mismanaged, uncompetitive businesses? This is welfare for the rich, but Bush and other conservatives like him don't want welfare for the poor. When the poor fail, government don't give bail out.

User avatar
The UCCS
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Mar 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The UCCS » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:55 pm

Natapoc wrote:
The UCCS wrote:If capitalism is to work, we need government interference. The Fed allowed a bubble to be created.
We're about to see a bubble pop with gold, by the way.


You feel gold is going to go down greatly? That would be really funny to watch.


Not yet. I want it to get to great depression standards, so I can start quoting Das Kapital again.
Economic Left/Right: -9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.97

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Cabestan, Egunsentia, Likhinia, Majalangka, Shinrogia, The Heavenly Utopia of Eden, Vassenor, Zantalio

Advertisement

Remove ads