They have those? I thought they just did squid
Advertisement
by Saint Kitten » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:23 am
by Sebtopiaris » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:24 am
by Kannap » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:25 am
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by The Treorai » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:26 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's a situation intrinsic to the committed ideologue. Whenever one makes a counter-argument the goalposts seem not only to move in two dimensions but also float several hundred thousand miles above the pitch whilst wearing cast-iron earplugs.
Rainbows and Rivers wrote:Dictators blaming America for all their problems? That's new.
Caninope wrote:If I think in my mind that the book sitting in front of me is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows when it is in fact Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th Edition, then it doesn't make me any more objectively correct.
by AiliailiA » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:28 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Uieurnthlaal » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:29 am
by Saint Kitten » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:29 am
The Treorai wrote:Sebtopiaris wrote:How about salmon?
Am I the only one who pronounces the "L"?
Also, what I want to know, is what the actual fuck they were doing flying a live fucking nuke over a motherfucking populated area?
Like, seriously. What nimrod said "Yeah, this seems like a sound strategy, Cotton."
by AiliailiA » Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:11 am
The Treorai wrote:Sebtopiaris wrote:How about salmon?
Am I the only one who pronounces the "L"?
Also, what I want to know, is what the actual fuck they were doing flying a live fucking nuke over a motherfucking populated area?
Like, seriously. What nimrod said "Yeah, this seems like a sound strategy, Cotton."
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Wind in the Willows » Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:13 am
by AiliailiA » Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:17 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Ayreonia » Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:55 am
The Treorai wrote:Sebtopiaris wrote:How about salmon?
Am I the only one who pronounces the "L"?
Also, what I want to know, is what the actual fuck they were doing flying a live fucking nuke over a motherfucking populated area?
Like, seriously. What nimrod said "Yeah, this seems like a sound strategy, Cotton."
by Eduardastan » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:08 am
Sebtopiaris wrote:Come to Australia, the climate's great!
by European Socialist Republic » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:15 am
Colura wrote:If that scares you, imagine what the Soviets must have been using at the same time
by Yes Im Biop » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:17 am
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by Lophozia » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:25 am
Yes Im Biop wrote:They also LOST a nuke off the coast at one point to...How the fuck do you lose a WMD?!
by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:26 am
Lophozia wrote:Yes Im Biop wrote:They also LOST a nuke off the coast at one point to...How the fuck do you lose a WMD?!
If I remember correctly, the protocol used to be to eject the bombs if the aircraft was going to crash. I believe it was to prevent the bomb from accidentally detonating in the crash/fire/explosion
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Xsyne » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:33 am
Ailiailia wrote:Btw, does the link to "the document" on the Guardian site work for anyone? For me, it just leads to a paragraph describing the document.This document was written on 22 October 1969 by Parker F Jones, the supervisor of the nuclear weapons safety department at Sandia national laboratories. The document has recently been declassified having been acquired under freedom of information provisions by the investigative reporter Eric Schlosser for his new book Command and Control. It is published here for the first time.
In the document, Jones gives his response to a passage in a book by Dr Ralph Lapp, a physicist involved in the Manhattan Project that developed the first nuclear bombs, that describes the accident in 1961 in which two hydrogen bombs were dropped inadvertently over North Carolina. An extract of Lapp's book is reprinted on the left hand column of the first page of this document, and Jones's expert response is printed on the right hand column.
The second page of the document is all in Jones's words, giving his expert opinion on the serious nature of the accident and how close America came to catastrophe
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
by Scapania » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:33 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Lophozia wrote:
If I remember correctly, the protocol used to be to eject the bombs if the aircraft was going to crash. I believe it was to prevent the bomb from accidentally detonating in the crash/fire/explosion
Warheads really don't "accidentally" detonate. They have to be armed because the firing sequence is too complicated to be randomly initiated.
by Xsyne » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:35 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Lophozia wrote:
If I remember correctly, the protocol used to be to eject the bombs if the aircraft was going to crash. I believe it was to prevent the bomb from accidentally detonating in the crash/fire/explosion
Warheads really don't "accidentally" detonate. They have to be armed because the firing sequence is too complicated to be randomly initiated.
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
by Fnordgasm 5 » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:37 am
Yes Im Biop wrote:They also LOST a nuke off the coast at one point to...How the fuck do you lose a WMD?!
by Vicswampia » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:39 am
by Vicswampia » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:40 am
by Xsyne » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:41 am
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
by Xsyne » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:42 am
Yes Im Biop wrote:They also LOST a nuke off the coast at one point to...How the fuck do you lose a WMD?!
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Dimetrodon Empire, Europa Undivided, Godular, Haganham, Homalia, Kenmoria, Kerwa, Likhinia, Neo-Hermitius, Omphalos, Picairn, The Yeetusa, Tiami, Tungstan
Advertisement