Frattastan II wrote:The other things you mentioned (accusations of vote-stacking; but I suppose forum-crashing should be there too) seem to be different outcomes from the same basic values (defending your own freedom, independence, sovereignty; recognising the former should apply to everyone, or at least to 'innocent' regions).
I quite strongly disagree that vote stacking and forum crashing arise from valuing sovereignty explicitly.
However, since you openly welcome raider regions - ie, the most blatant day-to-day offenders of the sovereignty of free regions - in your ranks, I'm not sure about the answer ...
I similarly do not agree with this classification. Raiding is not, in and of itself, necessarily a violation of sovereignty - and when it is, it is not necessarily unjustified.
Unless I'm jumping to conclusions, you believe those who attack the freedom and independence of others lose their own right to be free and sovereign and thus should expect to be raided/subject to other kinds of retaliatory actions.
Approximately, but it is not as black and white as you make it out to be. Not all who are attacked have freedom and independence to lose; not all who attack take away freedom or independence. Not all who do so can or should be struck in retaliation. Specifics require context.



. The latter gets in the way of the former.

