Advertisement

by Jozef van Oostvoorne » Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:59 am

by Kamchastkia » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:01 am
Jozef van Oostvoorne wrote:Yea to all, except for FALLA.

by Beta Test » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:03 am

by Jozef van Oostvoorne » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:08 am

by Phing Phong » Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:59 am

by Fulflood » Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:49 am
Straight male British apatheist pacifist environmentalist social liberal
by Of the Quendi » Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:36 am
Proper Procedure and Unacceptable Behavior Act
First Amendment to the Limiting Legislation Act
Senatorial Supremacy Act
First Amendment to the Republican Executive Act
Second Amendment to the Republican Executive Act
Senatorial Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation Enforcement Act
Second Constitution of the Senate
Prime Minister and President's Questions Act

by Venaleria » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:55 am

by TaQud » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:08 am
by Osea 767 » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:33 am

by Venaleria » Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:50 am

by Free South Califas » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:03 pm

by Venaleria » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:06 pm

by Wolfmanne » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:07 pm

by Rumostan » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:07 pm

by Rumostan » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:07 pm

by Kalmath » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:19 pm
The Blakewell Act
Author: Kalmath
Urgency: Urgent
Sponsors: Potenco, Britanno, Kourilia, Angleter, Wolfmanne, Bleckonia
DECLARING that Organized Crime in Aurentina has reached unprecedented levels.
SHOCKED at the blatant murder of Mr. Blakewell.
RECOMMENDS these measures to curb and control Criminal Enterprises.
§ I - Scope
1. (A) Any person part of a Criminal Enterprise who has committed any two of the crimes in (§ II -2- A) within a eleven year period, from passing of the bill onward, may be charged with racketeering. Any person(s) found guilty of Racketeering may be charged with a felony and will forfeit all ill-gotten gains. (B) Those found guilty of Racketeering may be subject to civil suits by those who have been harmed by the convicted.
2. (A) If the Commonwealth Prosecution Service chooses to indict a person on racketeering charges the defendants assets can be temporarily frozen until the either he is found innocent of racketeering or the racketeering charge is dropped.
3. (A) If one member of a criminal enterprise is indicted on racketeering charges under this act, the Commonwealth Prosecution Service may also indict all members of said criminal enterprise on said charges. (B) If found guilty all indicted shall be convicted of racketeering.
4. (A) The Commonwealth Prosecution Service may indict a person as the head of a Continuing Criminal Enterprise, and therefore, if convicted of racketeering face up to life in prison without the possibility of parole, a fine of at least 2 million of the accepted currency, seizure of ALL assets, and a felony charge.
§ II - Criminal Organizations and Crimes
1. (A) Criminal Enterprise: is a group of individuals with an identified hierarchy, or comparable structure, engaged in criminal activity.
2. (A) Murder, protection, kidnapping, extortion, robbery, arson, bribery, possession of stolen property, fraud, identity theft, theft, counterfeiting, embezzlement, obstruction of justice, slavery, money laundering, blackmail, smuggling, assisting/aiding/embedding illegal aliens, fraud, and acts of terrorism.
3. (A) Head of a Continuing Criminal Enterprise: an organizer, manager, or supervisor of the continuing operation and have obtained substantial income or resources from any of the crimes found it (§ II -2- A).
Hereby passes the Blakewell Act.
CTALNH wrote:Sorry for being me can we still be comrades?

by Finium » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:45 pm
Kalmath wrote:The Blakewell Act
Author: Kalmath
Urgency: Urgent
Sponsors: Potenco, Britanno, Kourilia, Angleter, Wolfmanne, Bleckonia
DECLARING that Organized Crime in Aurentina has reached unprecedented levels.
SHOCKED at the blatant murder of Mr. Blakewell.
RECOMMENDS these measures to curb and control Criminal Enterprises.
§ I - Scope
1. (A) Any person part of a Criminal Enterprise who has committed any two of the crimes in (§ II -2- A) within a eleven year period may be charged with racketeering. Any person(s) found guilty of Racketeering may be charged with a felony and will forfeit all ill-gotten gains. (B) Those found guilty of Racketeering may be subject to civil suits by those who have been harmed by the convicted.
2. (A) If the Commonwealth Prosecution Service chooses to indict a person on racketeering charges the defendants assets can be temporarily frozen until the either he is found innocent of racketeering or the racketeering charge is dropped.
3. (A) If one member of a criminal enterprise is indicted on racketeering charges under this act, the Commonwealth Prosecution Service may also indict all members of said criminal enterprise on said charges. (B) If found guilty all indicted shall be convicted of racketeering.
4. (A) The Commonwealth Prosecution Service may indict a person as the head of a Continuing Criminal Enterprise, and therefore, if convicted of racketeering face up to life in prison without the possibility of parole, a fine of at least 2 million NSD, seizure of ALL assets, and a felony charge.
§ II - Criminal Organizations and Crimes
1. (A) Criminal Enterprise: is a group of individuals with an identified hierarchy, or comparable structure, engaged in criminal activity.
2. (A) Murder, protection, kidnapping, extortion, robbery (of any means), arson, bribery, possession of stolen property, fraud, identity theft, theft, counterfeiting, embezzlement, obstruction of justice, slavery, money laundering, blackmail, smuggling, assisting/aiding/embedding illegal aliens, securities fraud, insurance fraud, and acts of terrorism.
3. (A) Head of a Continuing Criminal Enterprise: an organizer, manager, or supervisor of the continuing operation and have obtained substantial income or resources from any of the crimes found it (§ II -2- A).
Hereby passes the Blakewell Act.
Changes made and added Sponsors
Please add to Queue as it now has enough sponsors.

by Free South Califas » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:50 pm

by Byzantium Imperial » Tue Jul 09, 2013 2:21 pm

by Maklohi Vai » Tue Jul 09, 2013 2:34 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:Someone will have to tell me what the problem with ssa is.
Maklohi Vai wrote:Both as an admin and as a senator, I would urge senators to further look into the Senatorial Supremacy Act when compared to the First Amendment to the REA. As the latter grants the president a veto, this means there is a check on the senate. However, the SSA proclaims in section b), "no national or international person or body has nor shall have right to override or set aside the legislation passed by the senate with sole exception of senate itself." A veto is an override.
These bills therefore contradict each other and never should have been placed in the same omnibus in the first place, although those who supported the combining can only be faulted for not thoroughly reading the bills. If both of these bills pass, then the admins will have to examine the situation, which may lead to both bills being taken out of queue, their voting nullified, and essentially starting the chamber process over. Nobody want thats to happen. Therefore, I urge you to ABSTAIN on either the SSA or the REA amendment, but please do not vote in favor of both.

by Byzantium Imperial » Tue Jul 09, 2013 2:51 pm
Maklohi Vai wrote:Byzantium Imperial wrote:Someone will have to tell me what the problem with ssa is.
Ok:Maklohi Vai wrote:Both as an admin and as a senator, I would urge senators to further look into the Senatorial Supremacy Act when compared to the First Amendment to the REA. As the latter grants the president a veto, this means there is a check on the senate. However, the SSA proclaims in section b), "no national or international person or body has nor shall have right to override or set aside the legislation passed by the senate with sole exception of senate itself." A veto is an override.
These bills therefore contradict each other and never should have been placed in the same omnibus in the first place, although those who supported the combining can only be faulted for not thoroughly reading the bills. If both of these bills pass, then the admins will have to examine the situation, which may lead to both bills being taken out of queue, their voting nullified, and essentially starting the chamber process over. Nobody want thats to happen. Therefore, I urge you to ABSTAIN on either the SSA or the REA amendment, but please do not vote in favor of both.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement