There are two basic positions that have been staked out since the creation of this subforum.
Position 1: The World Assembly is still a single organization. Therefore, every piece of legislation it passes should be held up to a single standard, based as it always has been around the concept of a RP'd nation.
Position 2: The World Assembly is a single coded construct used in very different ways by different player groups. Therefore, now that a new subforum has been created to ease this transition, different types of resolutions can be created to deal with a wider range of concerns than WA legislation has historically addressed.
If these two positions are irreducible, then there can be no arrangement.
[movie reference]
Position 2 player: "Well, if there can be no arrangement, then it seems we are at an impasse."
Position 1 player: "I'm afraid so. I can't compete with you physically, and you're no match for my brains."
[/movie reference]
If we're going to resolve this without anyone dying, we either need to find a third position, or find some way to clearly discuss the merits of the first two, including whether or not they really represent absolute, non-negotiable approaches.
Perhaps to get people thinking: In addition to the initial creation reference in this thread, we have this description of the subforum, in classic NS style:
A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
So, what is the mandate of the Security Council?