Grays Harbor wrote:At the risk of ruining my reputation as a grumpy curmudgeon...
We believe this may be ready and are willing to support it.
I need a drink.
Advertisement
by United Federation of Canada » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:51 am
Grays Harbor wrote:At the risk of ruining my reputation as a grumpy curmudgeon...
We believe this may be ready and are willing to support it.
I need a drink.
by Ceni » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:47 am
by Icamera » Wed Jun 12, 2013 7:13 pm
Rynatia wrote:If I asked you to sleep with me would you answer with the same answer to this question?
by Icamera » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:07 am
Rynatia wrote:If I asked you to sleep with me would you answer with the same answer to this question?
by The Eternal Kawaii » Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:52 pm
by The Akashic Records » Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:15 pm
The Eternal Kawaii wrote:In the Name of the Eternal Kawaii, may the Cute One be praised
There are currently submitted two proposals addressing the same issue:
- "Invasive Species Response Act", proposed by Icamera and co-authored by Ceni.
- "Against Invasive Species", proposed by Ceni and co-authored by Icamera.
Would it be too much for the two delegations to kindly get their act together and submit a single proposal that they can both agree upon?
by Bergnovinaia » Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:18 pm
The Akashic Records wrote:The Eternal Kawaii wrote:In the Name of the Eternal Kawaii, may the Cute One be praised
There are currently submitted two proposals addressing the same issue:
- "Invasive Species Response Act", proposed by Icamera and co-authored by Ceni.
- "Against Invasive Species", proposed by Ceni and co-authored by Icamera.
Would it be too much for the two delegations to kindly get their act together and submit a single proposal that they can both agree upon?
They did try, ambassador, however, in the final stages there were some disagreements, and they decided to post their proposals separately.
by Ceni » Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:33 pm
by Christian Democrats » Tue Jul 02, 2013 11:44 pm
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by United Federation of Canada » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:04 am
Christian Democrats wrote:I do not believe that management of "invasive species" is an international issue. Individual member states are perfectly capable of enacting and enforcing environmental regulations of their own that meet the particular needs of their populations and ecosystems. Furthermore, I believe the definition of "invasive species" is flawed. It covers plants and animals but excludes fungi. For these reasons, I plan to vote against this proposal.
by The Akashic Records » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:33 am
Christian Democrats wrote:I do not believe that management of "invasive species" is an international issue. Individual member states are perfectly capable of enacting and enforcing environmental regulations of their own that meet the particular needs of their populations and ecosystems. Furthermore, I believe the definition of "invasive species" is flawed. It covers plants and animals but excludes fungi. For these reasons, I plan to vote against this proposal.
by Ceni » Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:45 am
The Akashic Records wrote:
In the interest of economic and citizen benefits, as well as the betterment of international relation from cooperation in avoiding preventable losses, both economic and environmental, we look forward to the compromise between the delegates from Ceni and Icamera.
by The Akashic Records » Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:29 am
Ceni wrote:Unfortunately, the proposal is in queue and now will be up to the whole WA to decide of they like the proposal, or if its time to go back to the drawing board.
by Calva » Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:12 am
by Riasy » Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:28 am
Christian Democrats wrote:Furthermore, I believe the definition of "invasive species" is flawed. It covers plants and animals but excludes fungi.
by Ceni » Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:50 am
Riasy wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:Furthermore, I believe the definition of "invasive species" is flawed. It covers plants and animals but excludes fungi.
This argument has convinced my government to vote against this draft of the "Invasive Species Response Act". Exclusion of fungi from the definition of “invasive species” is a grave flaw. We believe that this resolution should be voted down in its present form. Then the authors would have the chance to improve and resubmit it.
Iljas Saparitti, Ambassador.
by Bergnovinaia » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:07 pm
by Riasy » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:17 pm
Ceni wrote:Dictionary. com says : any member of the kingdom Plantae, comprising multicellular organisms that typically produce their own food from inorganic matter by the process of photosynthesis and that have more or less rigid cell walls containing cellulose, including vascular plants, mosses, liverworts, and hornworts: some classification schemes may include fungi, algae, bacteria, blue-green algae, and certain single-celled eukaryotes that have plantlike qualities, as rigid cell walls or photosynthesis.
by Potted Plants United » Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:23 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:"NOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPE!"
- Mr. Bell, when introduced to PPU's newest moving plant
by Ranseur » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:41 pm
by The Akashic Records » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:08 pm
by Rambo and elmo » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:15 pm
by Frozen » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:15 pm
by Rhino Utopia » Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:24 pm
by The Eternal Kawaii » Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:55 pm
Ceni wrote:The Akashic Records wrote:
In the interest of economic and citizen benefits, as well as the betterment of international relation from cooperation in avoiding preventable losses, both economic and environmental, we look forward to the compromise between the delegates from Ceni and Icamera.
Unfortunately, the proposal is in queue and now will be up to the whole WA to decide of they like the proposal, or if its time to go back to the drawing board.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement