Aaland wrote:Napkiraly wrote:So if a person is second generation born in England, drinks tea, has an English accent, goes to the local pub after work, worships the Queen, etc, etc. And they are not English because their grandparents came from India or Nigeria or where ever else? Wow.
They still aren't an indigenous person, is this difficult to understand? In this theoretical little situation where an immigrant completely assimilates (which does not happen the majority of the time due to the government supported legacy of New Labour's multiculturalism), it still does not make the racial replacement of an indigenous people okay at all, and if you think it does then frankly you're a horrible person.
Racial replacement? If they move here, settle down, integrate and whatnot, who gives a flying fuck if the most common surname becomes Kowalski?


The interviewer seemed to want to know why this is, as do I.

. I even have a union flag hanging in my room, better take it down and book a flight back to argentina where i belong so I don't "racially replace" the "indigenous" (Norman-Viking-Anglo-Saxon-Jutish-Celtic-Roman-French Hybrids).
