Advertisement

by Tribes Republic » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:02 pm

by NERVUN » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:06 pm
Regnum Dominae wrote:The bombings at the Boston Marathon today have got me thinking about this.
After a major tragedy or disaster, you will inevitably hear people saying things like "my prayers are with the victims and their families". But does this really achieve anything?
Obviously, as an atheist, I think that prayer in response to tragic events is silly and accomplishes nothing. However, I think that this goes beyond the usual debate over religion vs. atheism.
There are two (sometimes three) ways that I see people react to a tragic event.
1) Help provide actual, tangible, aid to the people who have been affected. This also includes making donations to aid groups.
2) Pray for the victims and their families.
3) (only applies if the disaster hits in a country that is or has historically been an enemy of your country) Loudly proclaim that the victims deserved it. This was especially prevalent in the aftermath of Japan's 2011 earthquake.
Ignoring the ridiculousness of option 3, there is a clear distinction between 1 and 2: one provides tangible help to the victims, while 2 does not. Even if someone is religious, I do not see the point in ignoring 1 in favor of 2. Because, if you truly want to help those who need it (I am ignoring the people who "pray for those affected" as an ego-boosting feel-good kind of thing), why wouldn't you do something that you KNOW will help, instead of something that your FAITH makes you HOPE will help?
What do you think? Discuss.

by Tlaceceyaya » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:07 pm
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by Regnum Dominae » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:08 pm
NERVUN wrote:Regnum Dominae wrote:The bombings at the Boston Marathon today have got me thinking about this.
After a major tragedy or disaster, you will inevitably hear people saying things like "my prayers are with the victims and their families". But does this really achieve anything?
Obviously, as an atheist, I think that prayer in response to tragic events is silly and accomplishes nothing. However, I think that this goes beyond the usual debate over religion vs. atheism.
There are two (sometimes three) ways that I see people react to a tragic event.
1) Help provide actual, tangible, aid to the people who have been affected. This also includes making donations to aid groups.
2) Pray for the victims and their families.
3) (only applies if the disaster hits in a country that is or has historically been an enemy of your country) Loudly proclaim that the victims deserved it. This was especially prevalent in the aftermath of Japan's 2011 earthquake.
Ignoring the ridiculousness of option 3, there is a clear distinction between 1 and 2: one provides tangible help to the victims, while 2 does not. Even if someone is religious, I do not see the point in ignoring 1 in favor of 2. Because, if you truly want to help those who need it (I am ignoring the people who "pray for those affected" as an ego-boosting feel-good kind of thing), why wouldn't you do something that you KNOW will help, instead of something that your FAITH makes you HOPE will help?
What do you think? Discuss.
It's called empathy... It's generally a nice thing to have.
![]()
Seriously, you think making a statement of empathy of "I'm thinking of you/praying for you" equates to "Doesn't do anything else"? Screw that. Not only that, being remembered does have an effect on those in the disaster zone. To bring up Japan (My home), yes, the aid helped, it was thankfully acknowledged (and still is), but the expressions of sympathy, even Lady Gaga's "Pray for Japan" also helped to remind those in the zone that they aren't alone, they are remembered, their suffering understood.
Two years on, many of them wonder if people still do.

by NERVUN » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:08 pm
Regnum Dominae wrote:NERVUN wrote:It's called empathy... It's generally a nice thing to have.
![]()
Seriously, you think making a statement of empathy of "I'm thinking of you/praying for you" equates to "Doesn't do anything else"? Screw that. Not only that, being remembered does have an effect on those in the disaster zone. To bring up Japan (My home), yes, the aid helped, it was thankfully acknowledged (and still is), but the expressions of sympathy, even Lady Gaga's "Pray for Japan" also helped to remind those in the zone that they aren't alone, they are remembered, their suffering understood.
Two years on, many of them wonder if people still do.
I'm talking about people who say things like "I am praying for the victims, I am perfectly capable of assisting with aid but I am choosing not to because God will sort it out anyway".

by America Resurgent » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:09 pm
Tlaceceyaya wrote:It is actually counterproductive.
Doing something with no real effect like wearing a ribbon, or in this case praying, makes you feel like you don't need to do as much actual stuff.

Galloism wrote:What an awful and sick disregard for human life.
Why can't they play call of duty or grand theft auto like normal people?

by Regnum Dominae » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:09 pm

by Tlaceceyaya » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:11 pm
America Resurgent wrote:Tlaceceyaya wrote:It is actually counterproductive.
Doing something with no real effect like wearing a ribbon, or in this case praying, makes you feel like you don't need to do as much actual stuff.
Your article doesn't actually say that, only that the increased awareness hasn't actually led to an increase in actual stuff.
Further proving that media effects on society are pretty minimal, I might add.
And there’s also behavioral economics research indicating that people who buy a “good” product feel licensed to cut back on doing good in other ways. These effects can include anything from giving less to charity or mentally justifying doing things that one shouldn’t. That would mean cause marketing isn’t actually positive at all.
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by The Truth and Light » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:13 pm

by YellowApple » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:13 pm

by The Truth and Light » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:13 pm

by NERVUN » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:14 pm

by NERVUN » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:14 pm

by Chinese Regions » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:16 pm

by The Truth and Light » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:16 pm

by America Resurgent » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:16 pm
Tlaceceyaya wrote:And there’s also behavioral economics research indicating that people who buy a “good” product feel licensed to cut back on doing good in other ways. These effects can include anything from giving less to charity or mentally justifying doing things that one shouldn’t. That would mean cause marketing isn’t actually positive at all.
Galloism wrote:What an awful and sick disregard for human life.
Why can't they play call of duty or grand theft auto like normal people?

by The Broken Imperial Sector » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:17 pm
Tribes Republic wrote:I live in Massachusetts about a mile from Boston and I don't pray because it does nothing for the victims or their families

by Regnum Dominae » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:17 pm

by Curiosityness » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:18 pm

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:18 pm

by The Truth and Light » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:18 pm
Regnum Dominae wrote:NERVUN wrote:Do they say "I am praying for the victims, I am perfectly capable of assisting with aid but I am choosing not to because God will sort it out anyway"?
Not in the exact words you used, but I fairly commonly hear people say "There's no need for aid donations. God is on the side of the victims, and He will sort things out".

by NERVUN » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:19 pm
The Truth and Light wrote:NERVUN wrote:Do they say "I am praying for the victims, I am perfectly capable of assisting with aid but I am choosing not to because God will sort it out anyway"?
No, it's perfectly harmless, polite social scripts like, "My thoughts and prayers go out to the victims."
It's part of our culture, why is it such a big deal to some people?

by Regnum Dominae » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:20 pm
Esselman wrote:I think saying they are in your prayers sends a message emotionally over physically which can be just as great for a victim to know someone out there cares and is paying attention

by Chinese Regions » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:21 pm
Regnum Dominae wrote:NERVUN wrote:Do they say "I am praying for the victims, I am perfectly capable of assisting with aid but I am choosing not to because God will sort it out anyway"?
Not in the exact words you used, but I fairly commonly hear people say "There's no need for aid donations. God is on the side of the victims, and He will sort things out".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Greater Agnolia, Herargon, Kewelsburg, Oceasia, The Archregimancy, Vrindi
Advertisement