NATION

PASSWORD

Which God?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Straughn
Senator
 
Posts: 3530
Founded: Apr 11, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Straughn » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:19 pm

Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?
No, it's grapes. The tapestries and the accenting marks of the language make a persuasive argument about grapes, not so much "virgins".
That's not to say i wouldn't penetrate 72 grapes if someone were kind enough to hold them for me.

User avatar
Straughn
Senator
 
Posts: 3530
Founded: Apr 11, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Straughn » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:20 pm

Muravyets wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?

That's actually true of all women, you know -- that we become virgins again after penetration. As long as we don't get too stretched out from passing babies and whatnot, we do eventually get our virginity back. Of course, we have to go a long time without sex for that to happen, but it does. So all anyone has to do is go find 70+ women who are either virgins or nuns or have just been really damned fed up with dudes for 7+ years.

What if it's halting your virginity WITH a grape?
And i don't infer Barney or Grape Ape.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:27 pm

Straughn wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?
No, it's grapes. The tapestries and the accenting marks of the language make a persuasive argument about grapes, not so much "virgins".
That's not to say i wouldn't penetrate 72 grapes if someone were kind enough to hold them for me.

I don't know if being able to penetrate a grape is really something you should be bragging about.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Milks Empire
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21069
Founded: Aug 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Milks Empire » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:28 pm

Muravyets wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)

Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?
No, it's grapes. The tapestries and the accenting marks of the language make a persuasive argument about grapes, not so much "virgins".
That's not to say i wouldn't penetrate 72 grapes if someone were kind enough to hold them for me.

I don't know if being able to penetrate a grape is really something you should be bragging about.

I'd penetrate grapes... with my teeth. :p

User avatar
Imsogone
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7280
Founded: Dec 18, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Imsogone » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:30 pm

Straughn wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?
No, it's grapes. The tapestries and the accenting marks of the language make a persuasive argument about grapes, not so much "virgins".
That's not to say i wouldn't penetrate 72 grapes if someone were kind enough to hold them for me.


gRapist.
"Normal is an illusion. What is normal for the spider is chaos for the fly" - Morticia Adams.

User avatar
Straughn
Senator
 
Posts: 3530
Founded: Apr 11, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Straughn » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:33 pm

Muravyets wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?
No, it's grapes. The tapestries and the accenting marks of the language make a persuasive argument about grapes, not so much "virgins".
That's not to say i wouldn't penetrate 72 grapes if someone were kind enough to hold them for me.

I don't know if being able to penetrate a grape is really something you should be bragging about.

Gotta have goals. *shrug*
I don't even know if could make the whole 72, or if i'd fall asleep somewhere along the line.

User avatar
Straughn
Senator
 
Posts: 3530
Founded: Apr 11, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Straughn » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:35 pm

Imsogone wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?
No, it's grapes. The tapestries and the accenting marks of the language make a persuasive argument about grapes, not so much "virgins".
That's not to say i wouldn't penetrate 72 grapes if someone were kind enough to hold them for me.


gRapist.
Win?

User avatar
Sidh Ohn
Diplomat
 
Posts: 696
Founded: Mar 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Sidh Ohn » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:37 pm

Cynrhea wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)



LOL! I'm glad someone agrees with me! Sexually inexperienced girls remind me of being a teenager, and awkward confrontations in the backseat of a car. I really don’t want to relive that when I die. :p


Seconded 8) I suppose they could always go with Halla instead, who promises them a seedy dive filled with sluts... :lol: :twisted:

All praise Halla! :bow: :bow: :bow:

Just watch out though ; Hastur hangs out in that neighborhood... :unsure: ;)
Last edited by Sidh Ohn on Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sidh Ohn
Diplomat
 
Posts: 696
Founded: Mar 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Sidh Ohn » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:42 pm

Straughn wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?
No, it's grapes. The tapestries and the accenting marks of the language make a persuasive argument about grapes, not so much "virgins".
That's not to say i wouldn't penetrate 72 grapes if someone were kind enough to hold them for me.


It's my extremely biassed opinion that grapes were just a metaphor for the nubile nipples and clitori of multiple young ladies. :shock: :twisted:

Those sick perves...oh how I envy their afterlife of depravity... :p :lol:

User avatar
Callisdrun
Senator
 
Posts: 4107
Founded: Feb 20, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Callisdrun » Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:45 pm

Sidh Ohn wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.
As it turns out, it's grapes, not virgins.
:palm:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/e ... 6/Overview

It´s virgins, dear, the Huris to be exact, and they become virgin again after penetrating - who do you think would be interested in grapes ?
No, it's grapes. The tapestries and the accenting marks of the language make a persuasive argument about grapes, not so much "virgins".
That's not to say i wouldn't penetrate 72 grapes if someone were kind enough to hold them for me.


It's my extremely biassed opinion that grapes were just a metaphor for the nubile nipples and clitori of multiple young ladies. :shock: :twisted:

Those sick perves...oh how I envy their afterlife of depravity... :p :lol:

It wouldn't be. They cut off the clitoris over there.


Yes, I know, unfair. It's a really tasteless joke.

Still, who the fuck would want 72 virgins?
Pro: feminism, socialism, environmentalism, LGBT+, sex workers' rights, bdsm, chocolate, communism

Anti: patriarchy, fascism, homophobia, prudes, cilantro, capitalism

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:47 pm

Callisdrun wrote:It wouldn't be. They cut off the clitoris over there.


Yes, I know, unfair. It's a really tasteless joke.

Still, who the fuck would want 72 virgins?

Someone who doesn't know any better?
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:48 pm

Callisdrun wrote:1. Because you said it.


That's impressive reasoning there.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Callisdrun
Senator
 
Posts: 4107
Founded: Feb 20, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Callisdrun » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:32 pm

Muravyets wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:It wouldn't be. They cut off the clitoris over there.


Yes, I know, unfair. It's a really tasteless joke.

Still, who the fuck would want 72 virgins?

Someone who doesn't know any better?

I can only assume so. Poor fuckers.
Pro: feminism, socialism, environmentalism, LGBT+, sex workers' rights, bdsm, chocolate, communism

Anti: patriarchy, fascism, homophobia, prudes, cilantro, capitalism

User avatar
Callisdrun
Senator
 
Posts: 4107
Founded: Feb 20, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Callisdrun » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:33 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:1. Because you said it.


That's impressive reasoning there.

I'm rather fond of it, yes.
Pro: feminism, socialism, environmentalism, LGBT+, sex workers' rights, bdsm, chocolate, communism

Anti: patriarchy, fascism, homophobia, prudes, cilantro, capitalism

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:52 pm

Callisdrun wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:It wouldn't be. They cut off the clitoris over there.


Yes, I know, unfair. It's a really tasteless joke.

Still, who the fuck would want 72 virgins?

Someone who doesn't know any better?

I can only assume so. Poor fuckers.

In more ways than one. ;)
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Nordicus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 590
Founded: Nov 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Nordicus » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:46 am

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Another thing, they may be statistics, but what were the chances that he was going to be related to someone that goes to my church? Those are some pretty impossible statistics.

The chances of that happening to a person who was related to someone from your church? Approximately: [(Number of people related to members of your church) * (average number of cases of that condition causing hospitalization and recovery globally within an average human lifespan)] / (Total global population); probably pretty low, though if it's a common condition and you go to a mega-church of a religion which strongly encourages large families...

The chances of that happening to someone who was related to a church-going person who would spread the story around? Quite a lot more likely, given the sheer number of church-going (or equivalent) people on the planet.

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Lastly, you are being hypocritical. You say that I need proof and resources for my claims, and yet you didn't have one for yours?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If I claim that I had a turkey sandwich for lunch, that isn't going to require any proof... it's a very ordinary claim. Saying that God personally intervened to keep a relative alive for a few minutes so you could say goodbye, on the other hand, is a lot harder to believe than that family member hanging on through force of will, particularly given that similar things happen for non-Christians.

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:It was like watching Donnie Darko (which I never saw) it makes you feel weird

:palm:

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:To say every prayer answered is a coincidence is stupid. If they were really coincidences, the majority of them wouldn't have happened.

That's the thing, though... most prayers do go unanswered.

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:lets think for a minute that there is beyond all doubt a God, scientifically proven and all

Or let's not, since, you know, there isn't even a shred of scientific evidence for God that I've ever heard of. ("I don't know how else it could have happened, so it must be God," doesn't count. That's not scientific.)

UAWC wrote:
Abdju wrote:1. Lâ ilâha illallâh, Muḥammadun rasûlullâh. I don't believe it, and I don't accept it as doctrine. I believe there are many gods. Whilst Muhammed may indeed have been a prophet of the Abrahamic god, I do not hold that god to be the only one. Thus, I cannot accept the first pillar.

Do you have some sort of logical basis for this...? :eyebrow:

Do you have some sort of logical basis for monotheism? Sorry, but you left yourself open for that one.

Cross-Rhodes wrote:Perhaps it's not that He is silent, but that we are too noisy. The bigger you are, the smaller God gets - metaphorically speaking.

And yet, it would be easily rectified if he would speak directly to humans like he is claimed to have done in the olden days. Unless, of course, he didn't really speak to anyone, which would mean that the Bible was most likely lying (or, at the very least, is so extremely metaphorical that none of it can be trusted as being literal).

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote: :palm: That's more than ridiculous.

Coming from the guy who has a patched-together political idea made from mutually-incompatible pieces of three different political and economic systems which you apparently only skimmed over when researching?

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:The Christian life is one of the hardest lives (if not the hardest) to live because we suffer for our faith.

Yes, such suffering you guys must feel. After all, Christianity is the dominant religion in the United States, where you have no significant discrimination against your religion, and can safely assume that most people you meet will be of the same core religious beliefs as you, and where nearly every federal Congressman (not to mention so many of the Presidents) share your religious views. Oh, woe is you!

And everyone mocks your faith and is suspicious of you!--oh, wait, no, that's the Mormons and Muslims (among others). Oh, well, a few states still have sections of their constitutions that (though unenforceable) claim to prevent you from holding office due to your religious views!--oh, wait, nope again, that's atheists. Oh, oh, but your people have been brutally butchered in the past!--er, wait, no, your people often did the butchering in the past...

Give it a rest. It's not the hard life. You guys don't have it any significantly worse than anybody else; hell, there's no shortage of people who would gladly trade their lots in life for what you are complaining about.

Callisdrun wrote:1066 CE

I've never liked the BCE/CE dating. In my opinion, if they were looking for something to use as an alternative to the Christian dating system, then they should have, you know, picked something else to use as the basis for the dates rather than slapping a new name on the same system. I know a lot of things in history don't have well-defined dates on which they began or ended, but you can't tell me that in all of known human history, there isn't even a single event that is both significant and reasonably well-defined enough to have been used as an alternative.

Turanbirligi wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
Turanbirligi wrote:a gay cant be moral

Do you have a list of random remarks that you pull these things from?

from my brain

Ah, I guess that explains a lot about your contributions to this thread. Or, rather, your lack thereof.
Seriously, I think it's safe to say you aren't impressing anyone with the small-minded bigotry you've been posting in here.

Cross-Rhodes wrote:The fact that the pilgrims left the "hedonistic" society of Europe to found their own "Christian" nation (which by the way - is in no way similar to the Christianity seen today), is not really debatable. Even secular historians support this, and therefore the dominance of organized Christianity in the Western hemisphere is slightly obvious.

However, the Pilgrims weren't even the first English colonists of the Americas, let alone the first European colonists. Heck, Georgia was originally founded from men released from debtor's prisons to work at the colony; I highly doubt that anyone would be able to make a strong case of it being significantly religious, but it is also one of the the original colonies, just like Massachusetts.

Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.

I believe the common joke is "Wouldn't you rather have a bunch of girls who know what they're doing?" :D
Last edited by Nordicus on Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Note: I am an atheist. If I say something supportive of a religion, it's because I try to be fair and even-handed, not because I am a follower of that religion.
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:Engineers hate biology, because it has very few right angles. Everything is all curves and bumps and the only penis-shaped items are actual penises.

Dregruk wrote:
Kma2 wrote:How else could it be that they are so uneducated regarding what is going on in America.

Same as anyone else; I slaughter gibbons and frolic in their blood. Or just, y'know, disagree with you.

Tsaraine wrote:Somewhere in Philadelphia, one school administrator has just smacked another school administrator upside the head. "Damnit, Jenkins! I told you we should just have gone with chastity belts!"

Biblical Creation

User avatar
Coffin-Breathe
Minister
 
Posts: 2398
Founded: Nov 22, 2009
Democratic Socialists

Postby Coffin-Breathe » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:08 am

Nordicus wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.

I believe the common joke is "Wouldn't you rather have a bunch of girls who know what they're doing?" :D


I wouldn´t care to much, as long as they´re nice ones...and quick learners. :)

User avatar
Karsol
Senator
 
Posts: 4431
Founded: Jan 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Karsol » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:56 am

My penis shall be your god, for it heralds a new age of eternal bliss and enlightenment.
01010000 01100101 01101110 01101001 01110011 00100001 00100001 00100001
Ronald Reagan: "Well, what do you believe in? Do you want to abolish the rich?"
Olof Palme, the Prime Minister of Sweden: "No, I want to abolish the poor."

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54

User avatar
Helgrin
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1059
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Helgrin » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:31 am

Karsol wrote:My penis shall be your god, for it heralds a new age of eternal bliss and enlightenment.

:shock:
Um...no thanks.
Mahna Mahna!

Light a man a fire and he'll be warm for a night. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:31 am

Karsol wrote:My penis shall be your god, for it heralds a new age of eternal bliss and enlightenment.


*covers it with gold*
*then seperates it from you body to put it on an altar to worship*
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Callisdrun
Senator
 
Posts: 4107
Founded: Feb 20, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Callisdrun » Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:46 am

Nordicus wrote:I've never liked the BCE/CE dating. In my opinion, if they were looking for something to use as an alternative to the Christian dating system, then they should have, you know, picked something else to use as the basis for the dates rather than slapping a new name on the same system. I know a lot of things in history don't have well-defined dates on which they began or ended, but you can't tell me that in all of known human history, there isn't even a single event that is both significant and reasonably well-defined enough to have been used as an alternative.

Read the fucking thread. I explained my position on this already. It's not the date I object to but the terminology.
Pro: feminism, socialism, environmentalism, LGBT+, sex workers' rights, bdsm, chocolate, communism

Anti: patriarchy, fascism, homophobia, prudes, cilantro, capitalism

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:06 am

Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Nordicus wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.

I believe the common joke is "Wouldn't you rather have a bunch of girls who know what they're doing?" :D


I wouldn´t care to much, as long as they´re nice ones...and quick learners. :)

Boy, you all make it sound like so much fun to be a girl.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Callisdrun
Senator
 
Posts: 4107
Founded: Feb 20, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Callisdrun » Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:10 am

Bottle wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Nordicus wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.

I believe the common joke is "Wouldn't you rather have a bunch of girls who know what they're doing?" :D


I wouldn´t care to much, as long as they´re nice ones...and quick learners. :)

Boy, you all make it sound like so much fun to be a girl.

I just think the emphasis placed on virginity in the minds of some is a bit silly. All else being equal, I think I'd rather be with a person who's had some experience.
Pro: feminism, socialism, environmentalism, LGBT+, sex workers' rights, bdsm, chocolate, communism

Anti: patriarchy, fascism, homophobia, prudes, cilantro, capitalism

User avatar
Abdju
Minister
 
Posts: 2153
Founded: Jul 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Abdju » Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:24 am

Callisdrun wrote:
Nordicus wrote:I've never liked the BCE/CE dating. In my opinion, if they were looking for something to use as an alternative to the Christian dating system, then they should have, you know, picked something else to use as the basis for the dates rather than slapping a new name on the same system. I know a lot of things in history don't have well-defined dates on which they began or ended, but you can't tell me that in all of known human history, there isn't even a single event that is both significant and reasonably well-defined enough to have been used as an alternative.

Read the fucking thread. I explained my position on this already. It's not the date I object to but the terminology.


Agreed. The date itself lost religious connotations a long time ago, especially when non-Christian countries adopted it for administrative efficiency. It is literally a common system, so CE (Common Era) is simply an accurate and natural term that everyone can agree on. 2010 isn't "Anno Domini", it's just a common, shared numerical reference to this year that most people adopt to discuss times and dates.

Left/Right -5.25 | Auth/Lib: +2.57 |
"Objectivism really is a Fountainhead of philosophical diarrhea" - derscon
"God Hates Fags But Says It's Okay to Double Dip" - Gauthier

Great Nepal - Tax supporting environment are useless, we can live without it.
Great Nepal - Lions can't fly. Therefore, eagles are superior.
Turan Cumhuriyeti - no you presented lower quality of brain
Greed and Death - Spanish was an Amerindian language.
Sungai Pusat - No, I know exactly what happened. The Titanic had left USA's shores and somewhere near the Arctic Circle
Derscon - I let Jews handle my money, not my penis.
Fevolo - i'm not talking about catholics. i'm talking about christians.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:12 am

Callisdrun wrote:
Bottle wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:
Nordicus wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Depending on what you prefer for afterlife (severe lifelong worshipping required), Allah seems to offer some pretty good things (paradise filled with virgins, aso)


Nobody's ever been able to adequately explain why I should want that.

I believe the common joke is "Wouldn't you rather have a bunch of girls who know what they're doing?" :D


I wouldn´t care to much, as long as they´re nice ones...and quick learners. :)

Boy, you all make it sound like so much fun to be a girl.

I just think the emphasis placed on virginity in the minds of some is a bit silly. All else being equal, I think I'd rather be with a person who's had some experience.

I'd rather not go to a "Heaven" where they hand out sex partners as if they were bunches of grapes.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Great United States, Greater Europia, Idzequitch, Ifreann, Lagene, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Omphalos, Raskana, So uh lab here, Statesburg, The Matthew Islands

Advertisement

Remove ads