Should we occupy Pakistan??

by **Godwinsplot** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:18 pm

Ah therefore I am not one of 'we' I am one of 'them'.

Perhaps a more relevant question is 'Should the world's largest terrorist state occupy Pakistan? Or nuke them like it did to Japan?'

by **The Emerald Dawn** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:18 pm

Godwinsplot wrote:Ah therefore I am not one of 'we' I am one of 'them'.

Perhaps a more relevant question is 'Should the world's largest terrorist state occupy Pakistan? Or nuke them like it did to Japan?'

Iran? When did they nuke Japan?

by **The Joseon Dynasty** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:19 pm

Indie Seattle wrote:
The Joseon Dynasty wrote:Why stop there? Let's just invade everywhere pre-emptively. Then we're guaranteed to never have any problems.

I hope youre being sarcastic.

It's sad but understandable that you need to ask that question.

by **Vorshka** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:20 pm

Divair wrote:No.

/Thread

by **Oswald Land** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:21 pm

We should envade them and take control of there country. it will be perfect who likes them?

by **Shirah Mataniya** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:21 pm

No, I believe you 'Yanks' have done quite enough interference in the middle-east for a life time.

by **Democratic Koyro** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:22 pm

Oswald Land wrote:We should envade them and take control of there country. it will be perfect who likes them?

I imagine the Pakistani's quite like having an independent country....

by **Koevoet** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:23 pm

#OccupyIslamabad

by **Episarta** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:23 pm

Shirah Mataniya wrote:No, I believe you 'Yanks' have done quite enough interference in the middle-east for a life time.

Oh, really? Please??? I mean, we could do so much more! Come on, it would be fun! Dead people everywhere! Increase tension between India and Pakistan, turn more people against us, what's not to love? I bet the fireworks would look pretty from space.

ISideWith UK · by **Eastfield Lodge** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:25 pm

Democratic Koyro wrote:
Oswald Land wrote:We should envade them and take control of there country. it will be perfect who likes them?

I imagine the Pakistani's quite like having an independent country....

Furthermore, what is envading?

by **Genovany** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:25 pm

All I know is they've got nukes, if TERRORISTS got hold of these nukes... Yeah we're f'd if that happens, so yes I think we should, but I also think we shouldn't, concerning the current state of the economy.

by **Petrovsegratsk** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:25 pm

Remember America: The Paks gave the Chins your crashed Stealth Chopper so they could... *Dramatic And Masculine Voice* REVERSE ENGINEER... it.

Plus, they hate India!

Oh, and Terrorists.

That'd be plenty reason for invasion.

I'd support it.

"Skallvia" · by **Maurepas** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:26 pm

Eh, I'm good. If the Pakis have any intentions of doing anything with their nukes, India will have some things to say about it.

It's not our region, and has nothing to do with us. The sooner we're out of it, the better.

by **Tagete** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:27 pm

No, war is pure himsa. I hope in a reunificated india (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldive and Pashtun Afghanistan, without the Belucistan) through peaceful and rightful referendums. Before free trade area, liberist trade is a strong base for the peace.

by **Shirah Mataniya** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:29 pm

Episarta wrote:
Shirah Mataniya wrote:No, I believe you 'Yanks' have done quite enough interference in the middle-east for a life time.

Oh, really? Please??? I mean, we could do so much more! Come on, it would be fun! Dead people everywhere! Increase tension between India and Pakistan, turn more people against us, what's not to love? I bet the fireworks would look pretty from space.

You Americans truly are a dangerous folk, I think the world should be concerned about you lot, not the Pakistani's. :blink:

by **Saruhan** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:29 pm

Maurepas wrote:Eh, I'm good. If the Pakis have any intentions of doing anything with their nukes, India will have some things to say about it.

It's not our region, and has nothing to do with us. The sooner we're out of it, the better.

Er, mate, "Paki" is an ethnic slur. I would suggest not using it

by **Cameroi** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:30 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Cameroi wrote:you know, i forgot to ask, not that it would change my other responses, but who precisely, is this "we"?

us

who us? the players of nation states? that might be interesting.

by **The Emerald Dawn** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:31 pm

Saruhan wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Eh, I'm good. If the Pakis have any intentions of doing anything with their nukes, India will have some things to say about it.

It's not our region, and has nothing to do with us. The sooner we're out of it, the better.

Er, mate, "Paki" is an ethnic slur. I would suggest not using it

Paki is an ethnic slur when used in and around areas that commonly used that abbreviation as a slur. It is quite common in American parlance, and is considered informal shorthand. I found that out the interesting way a couple of years ago.

ISideWith UK · by **Eastfield Lodge** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:31 pm

Tagete wrote:No, war is pure himsa. I hope in a reunificated india (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldive and Pashtun Afghanistan, without the Belucistan) through peaceful and rightful referendums. Before free trade area, liberist trade is a strong base for the peace.

Sorry, let me try and contemplate that with a straight face...

No. Not gonna' happen.

by **EnragedMaldivians** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:31 pm

Tagete wrote:No, war is pure himsa. I hope in a reunificated india (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldive and Pashtun Afghanistan, without the Belucistan) through peaceful and rightful referendums. Before free trade area, liberist trade is a strong base for the peace.

We were never a part of India. What on earth are you talking about?

by **The Emerald Dawn** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:31 pm

Cameroi wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:us

who us? the players of nation states? that might be interesting.

I think we got it. They might just agree to stop being bad simply to remove us from Pakistan.

by **Saruhan** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:32 pm

EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Tagete wrote:No, war is pure himsa. I hope in a reunificated india (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldive and Pashtun Afghanistan, without the Belucistan) through peaceful and rightful referendums. Before free trade area, liberist trade is a strong base for the peace.

We were never a part of India. What on earth are you talking about?

Neither was Afghanistan, I don't think history is going to stop him

by **Democratic Koyro** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:32 pm

EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Tagete wrote:No, war is pure himsa. I hope in a reunificated india (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldive and Pashtun Afghanistan, without the Belucistan) through peaceful and rightful referendums. Before free trade area, liberist trade is a strong base for the peace.

We were never a part of India. What on earth are you talking about?

Indian Neo-Imperialism reigns supreme!

by **Democratic Republic of the Triumvirate** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:32 pm

No. Just... no.

by **Saruhan** » Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:33 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Saruhan wrote:Er, mate, "Paki" is an ethnic slur. I would suggest not using it

Paki is an ethnic slur when used in and around areas that commonly used that abbreviation as a slur. It is quite common in American parlance, and is considered informal shorthand. I found that out the interesting way a couple of years ago.

Really? I've never heard it used as a short for before. I mean is "Pakistani" really that big of a mouthful that we need a shortform?

Should we occupy Pakistan??

Who is online