NATION

PASSWORD

All this sex scandal needs is a strawberry on top....oh wait

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What would you put on top?

A Strawberry.
4
5%
A Cherry.
14
16%
A Banana.
11
13%
Nothing at all.
11
13%
David Hasselhoff.
48
55%
 
Total votes : 88

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:26 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Yes I did. *nod*


So you're the one making it a "liberal matter", when really it has nothing to do with liberals.


Rather, it absolutely has to do with liberals and their attitude towards the conduct of elected officials.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:27 am

Ovisterra wrote:I really don't see how what happens between consenting adults should have to do with their job, unless they're porn stars/prostitutes.

Apparently the lady didn't consent to being sent nude photos. So…
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16012
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
So you're the one making it a "liberal matter", when really it has nothing to do with liberals.


Rather, it absolutely has to do with liberals and their attitude towards the conduct of elected officials.


By that logic it's about every ideology, because everyone has opinions on the conduct of officials. You're just making it a "liberal matter" because you seem to have lost the ability to have a discussion without making a knee-jerk post about how it's all the fault of the goddamned liberals.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177082
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I don't know where you got the idea that public officials are supposed to be the best, the brightest, the most virtuous and most ethical. They're supposed to be the people who win the election.


You wouldn't want a person possessing the attributes above to win elections?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm getting at. Top job on deciphering my encoded message.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

The conduct of "liberals" has nothing to do with the thread topic, which was the conduct of an elected official in South Africa. To engage in that line is thread jacking at best. How about we remain on topic and not let ourselves get dragged down with him, hmm?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

Risottia wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:He can stay erect with ice cream on his penis? And we're not giving out awards?


We don't give awards for photoshopping.

Yeah, what do you think this is? Cracked.com?
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16012
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:I really don't see how what happens between consenting adults should have to do with their job, unless they're porn stars/prostitutes.

Apparently the lady didn't consent to being sent nude photos. So…


Ah, then it's another matter.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:What are you talking about? And why are you sighing? Are you sleepy? Do you want to take a nap?


You don't understand that simple question?

I do understand that simple question.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177082
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:29 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:
You wouldn't want a person possessing the attributes above to win elections?


He never said that, he just said that it's extremely unlikely.

I didn't say that either.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16012
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:29 am

Neo Art wrote:The conduct of "liberals" has nothing to do with the thread topic, which was the conduct of an elected official in South Africa. To engage in that line is thread jacking at best. How about we remain on topic and not let ourselves get dragged down with him, hmm?


Good point.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:29 am

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
So you're the one making it a "liberal matter", when really it has nothing to do with liberals.


Rather, it absolutely has to do with liberals and their attitude towards the conduct of elected officials.


Given that this is in South Africa and thus the usual American partisanships are pretty fucking meaningless, this is way more than a simple strawman. This is Strawzilla.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16012
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:29 am

Ifreann wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
He never said that, he just said that it's extremely unlikely.

I didn't say that either.


True. It was implied, though.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Eaglleia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17377
Founded: Feb 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Eaglleia » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:31 am

Olthar wrote:I can understand why people are so absurdly interested in the sex lives of famous people, but there's really no excuse why that should create "scandals" and cost those people their positions.
"Oh my god! That man engaged in normal adult sexual behavior! He must be shunned and removed from office!"
It's stupid.

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:31 am

Neo Art wrote:The conduct of "liberals" has nothing to do with the thread topic, which was the conduct of an elected official in South Africa. To engage in that line is thread jacking at best. How about we remain on topic and not let ourselves get dragged down with him, hmm?


Depends, I call most all leftist liberals. In any case, I'm attacking the attitude of not caring and it's source.

If you have a counter-argument, present it. Otherwise, stop bothering me.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:32 am

Gauthier wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Rather, it absolutely has to do with liberals and their attitude towards the conduct of elected officials.


Given that this is in South Africa and thus the usual American partisanships are pretty fucking meaningless, this is way more than a simple strawman. This is Strawzilla.


Oh, I'm sorry I don't use the exact same terms for everything you do. Truly, I apologize.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:32 am

Eaglleia wrote:
Olthar wrote:I can understand why people are so absurdly interested in the sex lives of famous people, but there's really no excuse why that should create "scandals" and cost those people their positions.
"Oh my god! That man engaged in normal adult sexual behavior! He must be shunned and removed from office!"
It's stupid.


Well as far as we can tell, his "normal sexual behavior" consisted of doing so with a subordinate, who didn't really want to see his penis.

So...yeah. I'm cool with him getting fired.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:32 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Neo Art wrote:The conduct of "liberals" has nothing to do with the thread topic, which was the conduct of an elected official in South Africa. To engage in that line is thread jacking at best. How about we remain on topic and not let ourselves get dragged down with him, hmm?


Good point.


Not really.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:33 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:
You don't understand that simple question?

I do understand that simple question.


Then why did you ask what I'm talking about? If you understand the question, what are you referring to when you ask that?
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177082
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:34 am

Neo Art wrote:
Eaglleia wrote:


Well as far as we can tell, his "normal sexual behavior" consisted of doing so with a subordinate, who didn't really want to see his penis.

So...yeah. I'm cool with him getting fired.

And maybe a stern talking to on the proper way to serve strawberries.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:34 am

Ifreann wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:
You wouldn't want a person possessing the attributes above to win elections?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm getting at. Top job on deciphering my encoded message.

I'm asking you a question, not insinuating anything.

God, why is everyone on this site so defensive? Just answer the question.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:34 am

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
So you're the one making it a "liberal matter", when really it has nothing to do with liberals.


Rather, it absolutely has to do with liberals and their attitude towards the conduct of elected officials.


Yes. You rightists think its perfectly ok to sexually harass people and of course are willing to defraud the public purse.

:roll:
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16012
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:34 am

Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:I do understand that simple question.


Then why did you ask what I'm talking about? If you understand the question, what are you referring to when you ask that?


I think (and I'm not 100% sure here) that he's wondering why on earth you're asking such a question when it's only slightly relevant and the answer is obvious.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:35 am

Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Rather, it absolutely has to do with liberals and their attitude towards the conduct of elected officials.


Yes. You rightists think its perfectly ok to sexually harass people and of course are willing to defraud the public purse.

:roll:


Not really, no. But if you ask the majority of leftist on this site (such as the Op), they're perfectly fine with this sort of hanky-panky from elected officials even when it's consensual.

This is what I have a problem with.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:35 am

Ifreann wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
Well as far as we can tell, his "normal sexual behavior" consisted of doing so with a subordinate, who didn't really want to see his penis.

So...yeah. I'm cool with him getting fired.

And maybe a stern talking to on the proper way to serve strawberries.


seems a fucking waste of good strawberries. I doubt HE ate them.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Howdoyoudoland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:36 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Then why did you ask what I'm talking about? If you understand the question, what are you referring to when you ask that?


I think (and I'm not 100% sure here) that he's wondering why on earth you're asking such a question when it's only slightly relevant and the answer is obvious.


Responding to the point about our politicians being the person who gets elected.

I mean, that's obvious. What I'm asking is what sort of people should get elected.
You know what? I quit, this place blows.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvosa, Democratic Kingdom of South India, Hassingdor, Hirota, Kuromistan, Luziyca, Satreburg 2, The Republic of Holland, Tillania

Advertisement

Remove ads