Rather, it absolutely has to do with liberals and their attitude towards the conduct of elected officials.
Advertisement

by Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:26 am

by Wikkiwallana » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:27 am
Ovisterra wrote:I really don't see how what happens between consenting adults should have to do with their job, unless they're porn stars/prostitutes.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Ovisterra » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

by Ifreann » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am
Howdoyoudoland wrote:Ifreann wrote:I don't know where you got the idea that public officials are supposed to be the best, the brightest, the most virtuous and most ethical. They're supposed to be the people who win the election.
You wouldn't want a person possessing the attributes above to win elections?

by Neo Art » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

by Wikkiwallana » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:28 am

by Ifreann » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:29 am

by Ovisterra » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:29 am
Neo Art wrote:The conduct of "liberals" has nothing to do with the thread topic, which was the conduct of an elected official in South Africa. To engage in that line is thread jacking at best. How about we remain on topic and not let ourselves get dragged down with him, hmm?

by Gauthier » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:29 am

by Eaglleia » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:31 am
Olthar wrote:I can understand why people are so absurdly interested in the sex lives of famous people, but there's really no excuse why that should create "scandals" and cost those people their positions.
"Oh my god! That man engaged in normal adult sexual behavior! He must be shunned and removed from office!"
It's stupid.

by Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:31 am
Neo Art wrote:The conduct of "liberals" has nothing to do with the thread topic, which was the conduct of an elected official in South Africa. To engage in that line is thread jacking at best. How about we remain on topic and not let ourselves get dragged down with him, hmm?

by Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:32 am
Gauthier wrote:Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Rather, it absolutely has to do with liberals and their attitude towards the conduct of elected officials.
Given that this is in South Africa and thus the usual American partisanships are pretty fucking meaningless, this is way more than a simple strawman. This is Strawzilla.

by Neo Art » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:32 am
Eaglleia wrote:Olthar wrote:I can understand why people are so absurdly interested in the sex lives of famous people, but there's really no excuse why that should create "scandals" and cost those people their positions.
"Oh my god! That man engaged in normal adult sexual behavior! He must be shunned and removed from office!"
It's stupid.

by Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:32 am
Ovisterra wrote:Neo Art wrote:The conduct of "liberals" has nothing to do with the thread topic, which was the conduct of an elected official in South Africa. To engage in that line is thread jacking at best. How about we remain on topic and not let ourselves get dragged down with him, hmm?
Good point.

by Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:33 am

by Ifreann » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:34 am

by Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:34 am

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:34 am


by Ovisterra » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:34 am

by Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:35 am

by Neo Art » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:35 am

by Howdoyoudoland » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:36 am
Ovisterra wrote:Howdoyoudoland wrote:
Then why did you ask what I'm talking about? If you understand the question, what are you referring to when you ask that?
I think (and I'm not 100% sure here) that he's wondering why on earth you're asking such a question when it's only slightly relevant and the answer is obvious.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvosa, Democratic Kingdom of South India, Hassingdor, Hirota, Kuromistan, Luziyca, Satreburg 2, The Republic of Holland, Tillania
Advertisement