by Newsaintsland » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:13 am
by Call to power » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:16 am
by Kamsaki » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:38 am
by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:43 am
by Newsaintsland » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:51 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Wait, there was a treaty?
by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:59 am
Newsaintsland wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Wait, there was a treaty?
It hasn't been signed yet, but basically it would cede the U.S. sovereignty(Our constitution) to make a world government. Which I love my country and constitution, and if this gets signed by the United States, I would be obligated as a U.S. citizen(As every citizen would be) to fight against the federal government and install a new one.
by Newsaintsland » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:06 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Newsaintsland wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Wait, there was a treaty?
It hasn't been signed yet, but basically it would cede the U.S. sovereignty(Our constitution) to make a world government. Which I love my country and constitution, and if this gets signed by the United States, I would be obligated as a U.S. citizen(As every citizen would be) to fight against the federal government and install a new one.
The reason why it hasn't been signed yet is because it hasn't been presented yet. It doesn't even exist except as a draft.
by HC Eredivisie » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:07 am
Newsaintsland wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Newsaintsland wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Wait, there was a treaty?
It hasn't been signed yet, but basically it would cede the U.S. sovereignty(Our constitution) to make a world government. Which I love my country and constitution, and if this gets signed by the United States, I would be obligated as a U.S. citizen(As every citizen would be) to fight against the federal government and install a new one.
The reason why it hasn't been signed yet is because it hasn't been presented yet. It doesn't even exist except as a draft.
lol, That's right, but if this thing does become a full on treaty, and it gets signed, the work of not only our founding fathers but the work of so many people to bring freedom to the world, and help bring down the U.S.S.R. would be for nothing. And I don't know about y'all, but I like have a constitution that says the government can not take my freedoms away.
by The Final Rome » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:09 am
by The Final Rome » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:11 am
by Farnhamia » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:22 am
The Final Rome wrote:Its not really going to kill our Constitution. Besides, NO treaty eventually reached would do that, all it would do is require our government to try and reduce our dependence on foreign oil and other fossil fuels, reduce fuel costs in the long run, and preserve the ecosystem in which we live. Is that too much to ask?
by Newsaintsland » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:31 am
The Final Rome wrote:Its not really going to kill our Constitution. Besides, NO treaty eventually reached would do that, all it would do is require our government to try and reduce our dependence on foreign oil and other fossil fuels, reduce fuel costs in the long run, and preserve the ecosystem in which we live. Is that too much to ask?
by Call to power » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:14 am
Newsaintsland wrote:Well, I have indeed read the draft for myself, and if a world government(those words are in the draft by the way) is formed, it will indeed makethe constitution null and void if the draft isn't changed.
by Farnhamia » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:23 am
Newsaintsland wrote:The Final Rome wrote:Its not really going to kill our Constitution. Besides, NO treaty eventually reached would do that, all it would do is require our government to try and reduce our dependence on foreign oil and other fossil fuels, reduce fuel costs in the long run, and preserve the ecosystem in which we live. Is that too much to ask?
Well, I have indeed read the draft for myself, and if a world government(those words are in the draft by the way) is formed, it will indeed makethe constitution null and void if the draft isn't changed. Also, it would require bigger nations such as the U.S. and the U.K. to give money to 3rd world nations to help them with climate control. This is wrong because I work hard for my money, and I don't want some government in B.F.E. getting a hold of it. If they want my they cn set up a charity and ask. Also, this whole climate change crap is just that, crap. This has been proven time and time again that the Earth fluctuates in temperature and there is nothing we can do about it. CO2 levels rise because temperature rises, and temperature fluctuates. Also, it's snowing where I live, which is in South Texas, so I don't think the Earth is going to melt anytime soon.
by Greed and Death » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:24 am
by Angleter » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:39 pm
by Lackadaisical2 » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:43 pm
Angleter wrote:There's no such thing, there never shall be any such thing, the poor countries and China will demand money and only Britain'll be thick enough to give any, and as for 'world government' please see the UN.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Buffett and Colbert » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:44 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Farnhamia » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:58 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:This is absolute bullshit since the only text from this "treaty" that's been released is one written by NGOs that they would like to see passed.
by The Alma Mater » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:15 pm
Newsaintsland wrote:What is everybody's opinion on this?
by Pope Joan » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:16 pm
Ashmoria wrote:i think that if you are too lazy to type out your opinion you shouldnt make a thread on it.
by You-Gi-Owe » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:43 pm
Newsaintsland wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Wait, there was a treaty?
It hasn't been signed yet, but basically it would cede the U.S. sovereignty(Our constitution) to make a world government. Which I love my country and constitution, and if this gets signed by the United States, I would be obligated as a U.S. citizen(As every citizen would be) to fight against the federal government and install a new one.
by Buffett and Colbert » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:47 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:This is absolute bullshit since the only text from this "treaty" that's been released is one written by NGOs that they would like to see passed.
Great, thanks, Buffy. Now I have this song going around and around in my head:
There was a farmer who had a dog,
And Bingo was his name-o.
B-I-NGO
B-I-NGO
B-I-NGO
And Bingo was his name-o.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Likhinia, Saint Neots, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, Sutalia, Tungstan, Vanuzgard
Advertisement