by Suceavija » Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:26 pm
by SkyDip » Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:29 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Potlimitomaha » Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:32 pm
Suceavija wrote:Description: WA Security Council Resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
OBSERVING that CMK is the founder of the region, Democratic Socialist Alliance (DSA), whose residents have chosen to be governed based on the provisions of its ruling Charter. This Charter binds all residents of the DSA to its laws while not permitting any particular resident to have special privileges within or immunity from its jurisdiction regardless of any inherent powers or special status that may otherwise be asserted by any resident therein. CMK had signed this Charter, willfully accepting and binding CMK to all of its provisions.
by Three Lands » Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:41 pm
by Suceavija » Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:05 pm
SkyDip wrote:Right off the bat, I would check to make sure you are within the character limit, cause this looks long-winded. Other than that, this sounds like a regional spat that has been hopped-up to get through the SC. This boils down to some Founder power abuses if I'm not mistaken, and despite the impressive amount of content, I don't think that alone is enough to pass this proposal.
by Suceavija » Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:23 pm
Three Lands wrote:Our government respectfully disagrees with the need for a World Assembly Security Council condemnation in this case. Upon perusing regional communications of the DSA, it would appear that this is an ideological purification by the regional founder. We see no need for a condemnation at this point in time, especially considering the deplorable language and abuse flung at CMK which leads us to question whether the right and wrong of the issue is as clear cut as the authors claim it to be.
by Herrebrugh » Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:40 pm
by SkyDip » Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:48 pm
Herrebrugh wrote:I would just like to say that the entire function of the Security Council condemnation is to condemn nations that have committed deplorable acts.
Now, I don't know for you, but banjecting nations from a region merely for expressing their opinion, an act violating the charter signed by the founder, is fairly deplorable.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Three Lands » Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:49 pm
by Herrebrugh » Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:55 pm
SkyDip wrote:Herrebrugh wrote:I would just like to say that the entire function of the Security Council condemnation is to condemn nations that have committed deplorable acts.
Now, I don't know for you, but banjecting nations from a region merely for expressing their opinion, an act violating the charter signed by the founder, is fairly deplorable.
If we condemned every Founder who abused their powers, there would be a lot more badges out there in the world. Simply ejecting nations is nowhere near enough to Condemn a nation.
by Suceavija » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:03 pm
Millyland wrote:As anyone who actually knows the situation would say, CMK's paranoid ejections well warrant a SC condemnation.
by SkyDip » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:08 pm
Herrebrugh wrote:Good. Since this isn't about a founder simply ejecting nations; it's about a founder of a medium-sized region, ejecting nations contrary to the constitution she signed.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Herrebrugh » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:13 pm
by SkyDip » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:16 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Grolsch » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:18 pm
by SkyDip » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:24 pm
Grolsch wrote:Let's put it in this way: Cynthia McKinney doesn't just eject members of the region she founded, but she also:
1. Uses Founder powers
2. Uses Founder powers
3. Uses Founder powers
4. Uses Founder powers
There are probably a dozen things I don't know, but this is what I know.
Edit for spelling
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Comanici » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:49 pm
by Grolsch » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:55 pm
SkyDip wrote:Grolsch wrote:Let's put it in this way: Cynthia McKinney doesn't just eject members of the region she founded, but she also:
1. Uses Founder powers
2. Uses Founder powers
3. Uses Founder powers
4. Uses Founder powers
There are probably a dozen things I don't know, but this is what I know.
Fixed that for you. If you really want to move forward simply on these grounds, do so, but I would strongly advise getting more material or dropping this matter.Edit for spelling
by Suceavija » Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:01 pm
SkyDip wrote:Grolsch wrote:Let's put it in this way: Cynthia McKinney doesn't just eject members of the region she founded, but she also:
1. Uses Founder powers
2. Uses Founder powers
3. Uses Founder powers
4. Uses Founder powers
There are probably a dozen things I don't know, but this is what I know.
Fixed that for you. If you really want to move forward simply on these grounds, do so, but I would strongly advise getting more material or dropping this matter.Edit for spelling
by Arcomo » Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:05 pm
by Cerian Quilor » Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:06 pm
by Ratateague » Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:20 pm
by Der Nordland » Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:21 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement